Histone chaperones and the Rrm3p helicase regulate flocculation in S. cerevisiae.
Acetylation
Chromatin
/ metabolism
DNA Helicases
/ metabolism
Flocculation
/ drug effects
Gene Silencing
Histone Chaperones
/ genetics
Histone Deacetylases
/ metabolism
Mannose-Binding Lectins
/ genetics
Membrane Glycoproteins
/ metabolism
Mutation
Niacinamide
/ pharmacology
Nitrogen
/ deficiency
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen
/ metabolism
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Protein Binding
Ribonucleases
/ metabolism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
/ metabolism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
/ genetics
FLO genes
Flocculation
Gene repression
Gene silencing
Histone chaperones
Laboratory evolution
RRM3
Journal
Epigenetics & chromatin
ISSN: 1756-8935
Titre abrégé: Epigenetics Chromatin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471619
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2019
23 09 2019
Historique:
received:
08
06
2019
accepted:
03
09
2019
entrez:
25
9
2019
pubmed:
25
9
2019
medline:
27
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Biofilm formation or flocculation is a major phenotype in wild type budding yeasts but rarely seen in laboratory yeast strains. Here, we analysed flocculation phenotypes and the expression of FLO genes in laboratory strains with various genetic backgrounds. We show that mutations in histone chaperones, the helicase RRM3 and the Histone Deacetylase HDA1 de-repress the FLO genes and partially reconstitute flocculation. We demonstrate that the loss of repression correlates to elevated expression of several FLO genes, to increased acetylation of histones at the promoter of FLO1 and to variegated expression of FLO11. We show that these effects are related to the activity of CAF-1 at the replication forks. We also demonstrate that nitrogen starvation or inhibition of histone deacetylases do not produce flocculation in W303 and BY4742 strains but do so in strains compromised for chromatin maintenance. Finally, we correlate the de-repression of FLO genes to the loss of silencing at the subtelomeric and mating type gene loci. We conclude that the deregulation of chromatin maintenance and transmission is sufficient to reconstitute flocculation in laboratory yeast strains. Consequently, we propose that a gain in epigenetic silencing is a major contributing factor for the loss of flocculation phenotypes in these strains. We suggest that flocculation in yeasts provides an excellent model for addressing the challenging issue of how epigenetic mechanisms contribute to evolution.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Biofilm formation or flocculation is a major phenotype in wild type budding yeasts but rarely seen in laboratory yeast strains. Here, we analysed flocculation phenotypes and the expression of FLO genes in laboratory strains with various genetic backgrounds.
RESULTS
We show that mutations in histone chaperones, the helicase RRM3 and the Histone Deacetylase HDA1 de-repress the FLO genes and partially reconstitute flocculation. We demonstrate that the loss of repression correlates to elevated expression of several FLO genes, to increased acetylation of histones at the promoter of FLO1 and to variegated expression of FLO11. We show that these effects are related to the activity of CAF-1 at the replication forks. We also demonstrate that nitrogen starvation or inhibition of histone deacetylases do not produce flocculation in W303 and BY4742 strains but do so in strains compromised for chromatin maintenance. Finally, we correlate the de-repression of FLO genes to the loss of silencing at the subtelomeric and mating type gene loci.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that the deregulation of chromatin maintenance and transmission is sufficient to reconstitute flocculation in laboratory yeast strains. Consequently, we propose that a gain in epigenetic silencing is a major contributing factor for the loss of flocculation phenotypes in these strains. We suggest that flocculation in yeasts provides an excellent model for addressing the challenging issue of how epigenetic mechanisms contribute to evolution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31547833
doi: 10.1186/s13072-019-0303-8
pii: 10.1186/s13072-019-0303-8
pmc: PMC6757361
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
FLO1 protein, S cerevisiae
0
FLO11 protein, S cerevisiae
0
Histone Chaperones
0
Mannose-Binding Lectins
0
Membrane Glycoproteins
0
POL30 protein, S cerevisiae
0
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen
0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
0
Niacinamide
25X51I8RD4
Ribonucleases
EC 3.1.-
POP2 protein, S cerevisiae
EC 3.1.13.4
HDA1 protein, S cerevisiae
EC 3.5.1.-
Histone Deacetylases
EC 3.5.1.98
Rrm3 protein, S cerevisiae
EC 3.6.1.-
DNA Helicases
EC 3.6.4.-
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
56Subventions
Organisme : Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : RGPIN-2015-06727
Pays : International
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7766-71
pubmed: 10884407
Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):221-5
pubmed: 11089978
Science. 2001 Feb 2;291(5505):878-81
pubmed: 11157168
Mol Cell. 2001 Jan;7(1):117-26
pubmed: 11172717
EMBO J. 2001 Sep 17;20(18):5219-31
pubmed: 11566885
Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jan;22(2):614-25
pubmed: 11756556
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Apr 1;30(7):1465-82
pubmed: 11917007
Genes Dev. 2002 Jun 1;16(11):1383-96
pubmed: 12050116
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 22;277(47):45099-107
pubmed: 12297502
Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:481-516
pubmed: 12676793
Mol Cell. 2003 Dec;12(6):1525-36
pubmed: 14690605
Cell. 2004 Feb 6;116(3):405-15
pubmed: 15016375
Mol Cell. 2004 Mar 12;13(5):639-48
pubmed: 15023335
J Biol Chem. 2004 Dec 10;279(50):52069-74
pubmed: 15452122
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;60(1):5-15
pubmed: 16556216
EMBO J. 2007 May 2;26(9):2274-83
pubmed: 17410207
Cell. 2008 Nov 14;135(4):726-37
pubmed: 19013280
FEMS Yeast Res. 2009 Mar;9(2):178-90
pubmed: 19087208
Yeast. 2008 Dec;25(12):879-89
pubmed: 19160455
Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Dec;29(24):6353-65
pubmed: 19822659
Curr Genet. 2010 Feb;56(1):75-85
pubmed: 20012864
Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:445-77
pubmed: 20809801
Cell. 1990 Nov 16;63(4):751-62
pubmed: 2225075
Mol Microbiol. 2012 Oct;86(1):225-39
pubmed: 22882838
Science. 2012 Sep 14;337(6100):1353-6
pubmed: 22984072
Biochem Cell Biol. 2013 Feb;91(1):6-13
pubmed: 23442136
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Oct;41(18):8475-88
pubmed: 23863839
BMC Genomics. 2014 Feb 17;15:136
pubmed: 24533484
FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 Sep;14(6):845-57
pubmed: 24920206
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Nov;1839(11):1242-55
pubmed: 25106892
Nanoscale. 2015 Feb 7;7(5):1760-7
pubmed: 25515338
Cell Cycle. 2015;14(1):74-85
pubmed: 25602519
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016 May 02;8(5):
pubmed: 27141050
mSphere. 2016 Aug 17;1(4):null
pubmed: 27547826
Nucleus. 2016 Jul 3;7(4):405-14
pubmed: 27645054
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 May 5;45(8):4413-4430
pubmed: 28115623
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Jul 5;7(7):2219-2226
pubmed: 28584079
Front Genet. 2017 Jun 22;8:86
pubmed: 28690636
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 27;115(9):E2030-E2039
pubmed: 29440488
PLoS Genet. 2018 Jul 2;14(7):e1007495
pubmed: 29965985
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 12;9:2137
pubmed: 30258422
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 May 7;9(5):1533-1544
pubmed: 30862622
Genetics. 1986 May;113(1):35-43
pubmed: 3519363
Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 15;9(8):911-24
pubmed: 7774809
Genes Dev. 1997 Feb 1;11(3):345-57
pubmed: 9030687
Science. 1997 Jul 4;277(5322):105-9
pubmed: 9204892