Whole-genome sequencing of triple-negative breast cancers in a population-based clinical study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
DNA Methylation
/ genetics
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Genetics, Population
Germ-Line Mutation
/ genetics
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Prognosis
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ epidemiology
Whole Genome Sequencing
Journal
Nature medicine
ISSN: 1546-170X
Titre abrégé: Nat Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502015
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
accepted:
15
08
2019
pubmed:
2
10
2019
medline:
22
1
2020
entrez:
2
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) brings comprehensive insights to cancer genome interpretation. To explore the clinical value of WGS, we sequenced 254 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) for which associated treatment and outcome data were collected between 2010 and 2015 via the population-based Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) project (ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02306096). Applying the HRDetect mutational-signature-based algorithm to classify tumors, 59% were predicted to have homologous-recombination-repair deficiency (HRDetect-high): 67% explained by germline/somatic mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, RAD51C hypermethylation or biallelic loss of PALB2. A novel mechanism of BRCA1 abrogation was discovered via germline SINE-VNTR-Alu retrotransposition. HRDetect provided independent prognostic information, with HRDetect-high patients having better outcome on adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.2-0.87) and distant relapse-free interval (HR = 0.31, CI = 0.13-0.76) compared to HRDetect-low, regardless of whether a genetic/epigenetic cause was identified. HRDetect-intermediate, some possessing potentially targetable biological abnormalities, had the poorest outcomes. HRDetect-low cancers also had inadequate outcomes: ~4.7% were mismatch-repair-deficient (another targetable defect, not typically sought) and they were enriched for (but not restricted to) PIK3CA/AKT1 pathway abnormalities. New treatment options need to be considered for now-discernible HRDetect-intermediate and HRDetect-low categories. This population-based study advocates for WGS of TNBC to better inform trial stratification and improve clinical decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31570822
doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0582-4
pii: 10.1038/s41591-019-0582-4
pmc: PMC6859071
mid: EMS84088
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02306096']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1526-1533Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : A22932
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : A23916
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 100183
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : A23433
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Cancer Inform. 2012;11:147-56
pubmed: 22872785
Nat Genet. 2017 Mar;49(3):341-348
pubmed: 28112740
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Mar 1;110(3):
pubmed: 29584920
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Mar 09;2:
pubmed: 32913985
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Aug;1846(1):263-75
pubmed: 24998779
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 20;24(36):5652-7
pubmed: 17116942
Cancer Genet. 2017 Oct;216-217:159-169
pubmed: 29025590
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):53-9
pubmed: 18987734
Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1352-5
pubmed: 18323444
Genome Biol. 2014 Aug 28;15(8):431
pubmed: 25164602
Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;188:155-167
pubmed: 29580942
Cell. 2012 May 25;149(5):994-1007
pubmed: 22608083
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1275-81
pubmed: 18250347
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2127-32
pubmed: 17513820
Nature. 2006 Nov 30;444(7119):638-42
pubmed: 17136094
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(6):2013-25
pubmed: 17341461
Genomics. 2007 May;89(5):647-53
pubmed: 17276656
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug 2;103(2):213-220
pubmed: 30075112
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1050-62
pubmed: 27401886
Cell. 2012 May 25;149(5):979-93
pubmed: 22608084
Exp Cell Res. 2014 Nov 15;329(1):85-93
pubmed: 25281304
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3764-73
pubmed: 26957554
Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;77(18):4755-4762
pubmed: 28904067
Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(2):e158-e168
pubmed: 29341157
Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;76(7):1882-91
pubmed: 26787835
Genome Med. 2015 Feb 02;7(1):20
pubmed: 25722745
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 1;31(9):1196-206
pubmed: 21785460
Nature. 2016 May 02;534(7605):47-54
pubmed: 27135926
J Community Genet. 2018 Jul;9(3):201-208
pubmed: 29082482
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 04;107(1):357
pubmed: 25479802
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 15;24(24):6594-6610
pubmed: 30181387
Nature. 2006 Nov 30;444(7119):633-7
pubmed: 17136093
Nat Genet. 2017 Oct;49(10):1476-1486
pubmed: 28825726
J Clin Invest. 2011 Jul;121(7):2750-67
pubmed: 21633166
Nature. 2012 Apr 18;486(7403):346-52
pubmed: 22522925
Oncogene. 2014 Oct 2;33(40):4803-12
pubmed: 24141787
Nat Med. 2017 Apr;23(4):517-525
pubmed: 28288110