Great Expectations? Future Competency Requirements Among Candidates Entering Surgery Training.

Interpersonal and Communication Skills Professionalism Systems-Based Practice competency job analysis non-technical skills screening selection

Journal

Journal of surgical education
ISSN: 1878-7452
Titre abrégé: J Surg Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101303204

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 28 05 2019
revised: 29 07 2019
accepted: 02 09 2019
pubmed: 14 10 2019
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 14 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We describe a multimethod, multi-institutional approach documenting future competencies required for entry into surgery training. Five residency programs involved in a statewide collaborative each provided 12 to 15 subject matter experts (SMEs) to participate. These SMEs participated in a 1-hour semistructured interview with organizational psychologists to discuss program culture and expectations, and rated the importance of 20 core competencies derived from the literature for candidates entering general surgery training within the next 3 to 5 years (1 = importance decreases significantly; 3 = importance stays the same; 5 = importance increases significantly). Seventy-three SMEs across 5 programs were interviewed (77% faculty; 23% resident). All competencies were rated to be more important in the next 3 to 5 years, with team orientation (3.87 ± 0.81), communication (3.82 ± 0.79), team leadership (3.81 ± 0.82), feedback receptivity (3.79 ± 0.76), and professionalism (3.76 ± 0.89) rated most highly. These findings suggest that the competencies desired and required among future surgery residents are likely to change in the near future.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31606376
pii: S1931-7204(19)30482-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

267-272

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Aimee K Gardner (AK)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; SurgWise Consulting, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: aimee.gardner@bcm.edu.

Katelyn J Cavanaugh (KJ)

SurgWise Consulting, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Ross E Willis (RE)

SurgWise Consulting, Houston, Texas; University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas.

Daniel Dent (D)

University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas.

Henry Reinhart (H)

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas.

Mark Williams (M)

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.

Michael S Truitt (MS)

Dallas Methodist Hospital, Dallas, Texas.

Bradford G Scott (BG)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Brian J Dunkin (BJ)

SurgWise Consulting, Houston, Texas.

Articles similaires

How Certification Exams Reflect Current Practice.

Tara L Myers, Sean DeGarmo, Marianne Horahan
1.00
Humans Certification Clinical Competence Education, Nursing, Continuing Adult
Humans Female Pregnancy Adult Cesarean Section
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Clinical Competence Male Female
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Prostatectomy Learning Curve Male

Classifications MeSH