Peer assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States.


Journal

Journal of educational evaluation for health professions
ISSN: 1975-5937
Titre abrégé: J Educ Eval Health Prof
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101490061

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 18 08 2019
accepted: 08 10 2019
entrez: 16 10 2019
pubmed: 17 10 2019
medline: 9 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Peer assisted learning (PAL) promotes the development of communication, facilitates improvement of clinical skills, and provides feedback to learners. We utilized PAL as a conceptual framework to explore the feasibility of peer-assisted feedback (PAF) to improve note writing skills without requiring faculty time. The aim was to assess if peer assisted learning was a successful method to provide feedback on USMLE-style clinical skills exam notes by using student feedback on a survey in the United States. The University of Florida College of Medicine administers clinical skills examinations (CSEs) includes USMLE-like note-writing. PAL, where students support the learning of peers, was utilized as an alternative to faculty feedback. Second (MS2) and third (MS3) year medical students taking CSEs participated in faculty-run note-grading sessions immediately after testing, which included explanations of grading rubrics and the feedback process. Students graded an anonymized peer's notes. The graded material was then forwarded anonymously to its student author to review. Students were surveyed on perceived ability to provide feedback and benefits derived from PAF using a Likert scale (1-6) and open-ended comments during the 2017-2018 academic year. Students felt generally positively about the activity with mean score for items related to educational value of 4.49 for MS2 and 5.11 for MS3 out of 6. MS3s perceived peer feedback as constructive, felt benefit from evaluating other's notes, and felt the exercise would improve their future notes. While still positive, MS2 students gave comparatively lower scores than the MS2 students. PAF was a successful method to provide feedback on student CSE notes, especially for MS3s. MS2s commented that although they learned during the process, they might be more invested in improving their note writing as they approach their own USMLE exam.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31614406
pii: jeehp.2019.16.29
doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29
pmc: PMC6817788
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

29

Références

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Jun 23;2:157-72
pubmed: 23745087
Clin Teach. 2016 Apr;13(2):134-7
pubmed: 26119778
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Apr 01;5(1):11
pubmed: 15804360
BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1035
pubmed: 18687726
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):e57-64
pubmed: 20163217
Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):469-84
pubmed: 26995485
Med Teach. 2001 Jan;23(1):86-87
pubmed: 11260748
Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):527-45
pubmed: 17978966

Auteurs

Kira Nagoshi (K)

Buchholz High School, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Zareen Zaidi (Z)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Ashleigh Wright (A)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Carolyn Stalvey (C)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH