Effect of surface conduction-induced electromigration on current monitoring method for electroosmotic flow measurement.


Journal

Electrophoresis
ISSN: 1522-2683
Titre abrégé: Electrophoresis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8204476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 21 08 2019
revised: 14 10 2019
accepted: 23 10 2019
pubmed: 30 10 2019
medline: 16 3 2021
entrez: 30 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current monitoring method for measurement of EOF in microchannels involves measurement of time-varying current while an electrolyte displaces another electrolyte having different conductivity due to EOF. The basic premise of the current monitoring method is that an axial gradient in conductivity of a binary electrolyte in a microchannel advects only due to EOF. In the current work, using theory and experiments, we show that this assumption is not valid for low concentration electrolytes and narrow microchannels wherein surface conduction is comparable with bulk conduction. We show that in presence of surface conduction, a gradient in conductivity of binary electrolyte not only advects with EOF but also undergoes electromigration. This electromigration phenomenon is nonlinear and is characterized by propagation of shock and rarefaction waves in ion concentrations. Consequently, in presence of surface conduction, the current-time relationships for forward and reverse displacement in the current monitoring method are asymmetric and the displacement time is also direction dependent. To quantify the effect of surface conduction, we present analytical expressions for current-time relationship in the regime when surface conduction is comparable to bulk conduction. We validate these relations with experimental data by performing a series of current monitoring experiments in a glass microfluidic chip at low electrolyte concentrations. The experimentally validated analytical expressions for current-time relationships presented in this work can be used to correctly estimate EOF using the current monitoring method when surface conduction is not negligible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31661562
doi: 10.1002/elps.201900308
doi:

Substances chimiques

Electrolytes 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

570-577

Subventions

Organisme : Science and Engineering Research Board
ID : IMP/2018/000422
Pays : International
Organisme : IRD, IIT Delhi
ID : FIRP-2
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Références

Kirby, B. J., Hasselbrink Jr., E. F., Electrophoresis 2004, 25, 187-202.
Bruus, H., Theoretical Microfluidics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
Milanova, D., Chambers, R. D., Bahga, S. S., Santiago, J. G., Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 3259-3262.
Dubey, K., Gupta, A., Bahga, S. S., Electrophoresis 2019, 40, 730-739.
Milanova, D., Chambers, R. D., Bahga, S. S., Santiago J. G., Electrophoresis 2011, 32, 3286-3294.
Laser, D. J., Santiago, J. G., J. Micromech. Microeng. 2004, 14, R35.
Dubey, K., Gupta, A., Bahga, S. S., Phys. Fluids 2017, 29, 092007.
Fu, A. Y., Spence, C., Scherer, A., Arnold, F. H., Quake, S. R., Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 1109-1111.
Zhang, W., He, M., Yuan, T., Xu, W., Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 3130-3135.
Arulanandam, S., Li, D., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 225, 421-428.
Ren, L., Escobedo-Canseco, C., Li, D., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 250, 238-242.
Sinton, D., Escobedo-Canseco, C., Ren, L., Li, D., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 254, 184-189.
Sze, A., Erickson, D., Ren, L., Li, D., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 261, 402-410.
Saucedo-Espinosa, M. A., Lapizco-Encinas, B. H., Biomicrofluidics 2016, 10, 033104.
Lim, C. Y., Lam, Y. C., Biomicrofluidics 2012, 6, 012816.
Li, J., Li, D., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 553, 31-39.
Lim, A. E., Lim, C. Y., Lam, Y. C., Taboryski, R., Wang, S. R., Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 255303.
Bahga, S. S., Moza, R., Khichar, M., Proc. R. Soc. A 2016, 472, 20150661.
Sohn, S., Cho, I., Kwon, S., Lee, H., Kim, S. J., Langmuir 2018, 34, 7916-7921.
Mani, A., Bazant, M. Z., Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2011, 84, 061504.
Bahga, S. S., Santiago, J. G., Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 1048-1059.
Bahga, S. S., Santiago, J. G., Analyst 2013, 138, 735-754.
Ghosal, S., Chen, Z., Bull. Math. Biol. 2010, 72, 2047-2066.
Christov, I. C., Wave Motion 2017, 71, 42-52.
Iler, R. K., Aler, R. K., The Chemistry of Silica, Wiley, New York 1978.
Stein, D., Kruithof, M., Dekker, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 035901.

Auteurs

Mohammad Babar (M)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India.

Kaushlendra Dubey (K)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India.

Supreet Singh Bahga (SS)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India.

Articles similaires

Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations.

Lucas Eigi Borges Tanaka, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tércio Vieira Grangeiro et al.
1.00
Composite Resins Materials Testing Printing, Three-Dimensional Surface Properties Flexural Strength
Ultraviolet Rays Disinfection Ultrasonography Surface Properties Humans

Low-cost portable sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of Pb

Niloufar Amin, Jiangang Chen, Qing Cao et al.
1.00
Lead Electric Capacitance Limit of Detection Electrodes Electrochemical Techniques
Sodium Fluoride Gallic Acid Humans Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Dentin Sensitivity

Classifications MeSH