Exit strategies for "needle fatigue" in multiple sclerosis: a propensity score-matched comparison study.
Administration, Oral
Adult
Crotonates
/ administration & dosage
Dimethyl Fumarate
/ administration & dosage
Drug Substitution
Female
Humans
Hydroxybutyrates
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Injections, Subcutaneous
Interferon alpha-2
/ administration & dosage
Interferon-alpha
/ administration & dosage
Male
Medication Adherence
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
/ drug therapy
Nitriles
Polyethylene Glycols
/ administration & dosage
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Propensity Score
Recombinant Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Toluidines
/ administration & dosage
Young Adult
Multiple sclerosis
Needle fatigue
Oral drugs
Treatment persistence
Journal
Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
revised:
04
11
2019
pubmed:
14
11
2019
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
14
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with multiple sclerosis on long-term injectable therapies may suffer from the so-called "needle fatigue", i.e., a waning commitment to continue with the prescribed injectable treatment. Therefore, alternative treatment strategies to enhance patients' adherence are warranted. In this independent, multicentre post-marketing study, we sought to directly compare switching to either teriflunomide (TFN), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or pegylated interferon (PEG) on treatment persistence and time to first relapse over a 12-month follow-up. We analyzed a total of 621 patients who were free of relapses and gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the year prior to switching to DMF (n = 265), TFN (n = 160), or PEG (n = 196). Time to discontinuation and time to first relapse were explored in the whole population by Cox regression models adjusted for baseline variables and after a 1:1:1 ratio propensity score (PS)-based matching procedure. Treatment discontinuation was more frequent after switching to PEG (28.6%) than DMF (14.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25, p < 0.001) and TFN (16.9%; HR = 0.27, p < 0.001). We found similar results even in the re-sampled cohort of 222 patients (74 per group) derived by the PS-based matching procedure. The highest discontinuation rate observed in PEG recipient was mainly due to poor tolerability (p = 0.005) and pregnancy planning (p = 0.04). The low number of patients who relapsed over the 12-month follow-up (25 out of 621, approximately 4%) prevented any analysis on the short-term risk of relapse. This real-world study suggests that oral drugs are a better switching option than low-frequency interferon for promoting the short-term treatment persistence in stable patients who do not tolerate injectable drugs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31720848
doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09625-1
pii: 10.1007/s00415-019-09625-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Crotonates
0
Hydroxybutyrates
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Interferon alpha-2
0
Interferon-alpha
0
Nitriles
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
Toluidines
0
teriflunomide
1C058IKG3B
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Dimethyl Fumarate
FO2303MNI2
peginterferon alfa-2b
G8RGG88B68
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
694-702Références
J Neurol Sci. 2007 Aug 15;259(1-2):104-8
pubmed: 17376486
Eur J Neurol. 2011 Jan;18(1):69-77
pubmed: 20561039
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:364-369
pubmed: 30476872
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Feb 27;5:101-8
pubmed: 21448467
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 14;14(1):e0210417
pubmed: 30640935
Int MS J. 2009 Sep;16(3):90-7
pubmed: 19878631
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018 May 23;4(2):2055217318777894
pubmed: 29854415
RMD Open. 2019 May 1;5(1):e000953
pubmed: 31168417
Mult Scler. 2017 Jan;23(1):21-22
pubmed: 26883944
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35600
pubmed: 22615737
Neurology. 2019 Aug 13;93(7):e635-e646
pubmed: 31300547
J Neurol. 2008 Dec;255 Suppl 6:87-92
pubmed: 19300966
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
J Neurol Sci. 2004 Jul 15;222(1-2):13-9
pubmed: 15240190
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Feb 13;13:261-272
pubmed: 30863016
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1622-1636
pubmed: 29576504
J Neurol. 2009 Apr;256(4):568-76
pubmed: 19444532
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Sep 10;11:1756286418796404
pubmed: 30210582
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(4):588-596
pubmed: 27357507
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Aug 21;8:1123-34
pubmed: 25170258
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53
pubmed: 16708349
J Neurol. 2019 Feb;266(2):411-416
pubmed: 30515629
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123824
pubmed: 25867095
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):675-83
pubmed: 21626604
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1 Suppl A):S24-40
pubmed: 23383731
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 May;4(3):202-18
pubmed: 26008937
Eur Neurol. 2014;71(5-6):233-41
pubmed: 24480868
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468
pubmed: 30636699
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1107-16
pubmed: 9027513
J Neurol. 2018 May;265(5):1174-1183
pubmed: 29549468
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):89-100
pubmed: 20067327
Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25:43-50
pubmed: 12923989
Adv Ther. 2011 Jan;28(1):51-61
pubmed: 21153000
Mult Scler. 2019 Aug;25(9):1263-1272
pubmed: 30044207
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;26:33-36
pubmed: 30216756