Blood transcriptome analysis in a buck-ewe hybrid and its parents.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 11 2019
25 11 2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2019
accepted:
07
11
2019
entrez:
27
11
2019
pubmed:
27
11
2019
medline:
4
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Examples of living sheep-goat hybrids are rare, mainly due to incorrect chromosome pairing, which is thought to be the main cause for species incompatibility. This case represents the first report of a buck-ewe hybrid and the first mammalian hybrid to be analyzed with next generation sequencing. The buck-ewe hybrid had an intermediate karyotype to the parental species, with 57 chromosomes. Analysis of the blood transcriptomes of the hybrid and both parents revealed that gene expression levels differed between the hybrid and its parents. This could be explained in part by age-dependent differences in gene expression. Contribution to the geep transcriptome was larger from the paternal, compared to the maternal, genome. Furthermore, imprinting patterns deviated considerably from what is known from other mammals. Potentially deleterious variants appeared to be compensated for by monoallelic expression of transcripts. Hence, the data imply that the buck-ewe hybrid compensated for the phylogenetic distance between the parental species by several mechanisms: adjustment of gene expression levels, adaptation to imprinting incompatibilities, and selective monoallelic expression of advantageous transcripts. This study offers a unique opportunity to gain insights into the transcriptome biology and regulation of a hybrid mammal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31767945
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53901-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-53901-z
pmc: PMC6877586
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17492Références
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 04;6:34781
pubmed: 27698378
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3572
pubmed: 18958286
Anim Genet. 2010 Oct;41(5):449-53
pubmed: 20809919
Nat Genet. 2011 May;43(5):491-8
pubmed: 21478889
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7721):113-116
pubmed: 30135579
Genome Biol. 2013 May 29;14(5):R51
pubmed: 23718773
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D419-D426
pubmed: 30407594
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):120-4
pubmed: 10802670
Nat Genet. 1995 Sep;11(1):52-9
pubmed: 7550314
Bioinformatics. 2016 Aug 1;32(15):2366-8
pubmed: 27153580
Science. 1907 May 17;25(646):791-2
pubmed: 17810904
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Aug;113(2):167-75
pubmed: 24619185
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):511-5
pubmed: 20436464
Mamm Genome. 1998 Oct;9(10):831-4
pubmed: 9745039
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Aug;44:9-21
pubmed: 27318130
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Anim Genet. 1989;20(2):179-86
pubmed: 2757269
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Feb 15;27(4):732-741
pubmed: 29228364
Reproduction. 2008 Jan;135(1):29-40
pubmed: 18159081
J Endocrinol. 1996 Apr;149(1):117-24
pubmed: 8676043
Nat Genet. 1993 May;4(1):94-7
pubmed: 8513333
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;31(2):135-41
pubmed: 23263233
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):114-22
pubmed: 14735122
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
pubmed: 19289445
Mamm Genome. 2007 Jan;18(1):75-85
pubmed: 17242862
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
Nat Genet. 1998 Dec;20(4):362-5
pubmed: 9843208
N Z Vet J. 1990 Apr;38(1):7-9
pubmed: 16031565