The productivity-biodiversity relationship varies across diversity dimensions.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 12 2019
12 12 2019
Historique:
received:
25
01
2019
accepted:
21
11
2019
entrez:
14
12
2019
pubmed:
14
12
2019
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding the processes that drive the dramatic changes in biodiversity along the productivity gradient remains a major challenge. Insight from simple, bivariate relationships so far has been limited. We combined >11,000 community plots in the French Alps with a molecular phylogeny and trait information for >1200 plant species to simultaneously investigate the relationships between all major biodiversity dimensions and satellite-sensed productivity. Using an approach that tests for differential effects of species dominance, species similarity and the interplay between phylogeny and traits, we demonstrate that unimodal productivity-biodiversity relationships only dominate for taxonomic diversity. In forests, trait and phylogenetic diversity typically increase with productivity, while in grasslands, relationships shift from unimodal to declining with greater land-use intensity. High productivity may increase trait/phylogenetic diversity in ecosystems with few external constraints (forests) by promoting complementary strategies, but under external constraints (managed grasslands) successful strategies are similar and thus the best competitors may be selected.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31831803
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13678-1
pii: 10.1038/s41467-019-13678-1
pmc: PMC6908676
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5691Références
Ecol Lett. 2010 Sep;13(9):1085-93
pubmed: 20576030
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014 Jun 1;23(6):620-632
pubmed: 24791149
Ecology. 2013 Feb;94(2):465-77
pubmed: 23691665
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):524-31
pubmed: 21352456
Nature. 2012 Jun 06;486(7401):59-67
pubmed: 22678280
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):302-5
pubmed: 26185249
Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):390-3
pubmed: 26760203
Science. 2011 Sep 23;333(6050):1750-3
pubmed: 21940895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 24;114(4):705-710
pubmed: 28074042
Ecography. 2014 Dec 1;37(12):1254-1266
pubmed: 25722539
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):363-4
pubmed: 16322049
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):176-83
pubmed: 26236902
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15405
pubmed: 29133911
Ecology. 2012 Mar;93(3):477-89
pubmed: 22624203
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17012-7
pubmed: 18971334
Ecol Lett. 2013 Oct;16(10):1234-44
pubmed: 23910526
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140005
pubmed: 25561666
Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):281-291
pubmed: 28547607
Sci Data. 2017 Sep 05;4:170122
pubmed: 28872642
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10394-7
pubmed: 22689971
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):129-31
pubmed: 18006550
Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):14-27
pubmed: 16874612
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10160-10165
pubmed: 28874547
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):8996-9000
pubmed: 23674676
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):143-53
pubmed: 26236899