Development and mixed-methods evaluation of an online animation for young people about genome sequencing.
Journal
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
ISSN: 1476-5438
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9302235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
accepted:
05
12
2019
revised:
03
12
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2020
medline:
28
5
2021
entrez:
4
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Children and young people with rare and inherited diseases will be significant beneficiaries of genome sequencing. However, most educational resources are developed for adults. To address this gap in informational resources, we have co-designed, developed and evaluated an educational resource about genome sequencing for young people. The first animation explains what a genome is, genomic variation and genome sequencing ("My Genome Sequence": http://bit.ly/mygenomesequence), the second focuses on the limitations and uncertainties of genome sequencing ("My Genome Sequence part 2": http://bit.ly/mygenomesequence2). In total, 554 school pupils (11-15 years) took part in the quantitative evaluation. Mean objective knowledge increased from before to after watching one or both animations (4.24 vs 7.60 respectively; t = 32.16, p < 0.001). Self-rated awareness and understanding of the words 'genome' and 'genome sequencing' increased significantly after watching the animation. Most pupils felt they understood the benefits of sequencing after watching one (75.4%) or both animations (76.6%). Only 17.3% felt they understood the limitations and uncertainties after watching the first, however this was higher among those watching both (58.5%, p < 0.001). Twelve young people, 14 parents and 3 health professionals consenting in the 100,000 Genomes Project reported that the animation was clear and engaging, eased concerns about the process and empowered young people to take an active role in decision-making. To increase accessibility, subtitles in other languages could be added, and the script could be made available in a leaflet format for those that do not have internet access. Future research could focus on formally evaluating the animations in a clinical setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31896776
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0564-5
pii: 10.1038/s41431-019-0564-5
pmc: PMC7316978
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
896-906Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-1014-35016
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
European Organisation for Rare Diseases: Rare diseases: understanding this public health priority. Institution, 2005, https://www.eurordis.org/IMG/pdf/princeps_document-EN.pdf .
Bush LW, Bartoshesky LE, David KL, Wilfond B, Williams JL, Holm IA. Pediatric clinical exome/genome sequencing and the engagement process: encouraging active conversation with the older child and adolescent: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics Med: Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2018;20:692–4.
Sanderson SC, Suckiel SA, Zweig M, Bottinger EP, Jabs EW, Richardson LD. Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public. Genet Med: Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2015;18:501–12.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.118
Genomics England: The 100,000 genomes project—how we get results. Institution, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1k91ynqFIU .
Genomics Education Programme: Introducing genomics in healthcare. Institution, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiQgrK3tge8 .
Anna Middleton: Socialising the genome. Institution, 2016, https://genetube.org/6fd741?fv=#/start-video .
Frederick C. Psychosocial challenges/transition to adulthood. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63:735–49.
doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.04.011
Chen CW, Su WJ, Chiang YT, Shu YM, Moons P: Healthcare needs of adolescents with congenital heart disease transitioning into adulthood: a Delphi survey of patients, parents, and healthcare providers. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;16:125–35.
The Patient Experience Network: Improving Patient Experience for Children and Young People. East Sussex: NHS England, 2013.
Broome ME. Consent (assent) for research with pediatric patients. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1999;15:96–103.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-2081(99)80067-9
McGlashan HL, Dineen RA, Szeszak S, Whitehouse WP, Chow G, Love A, et al. Evaluation of an internet-based animated preparatory video for children undergoing non-sedated MRI. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170719.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170719
McElhaney KW, Chang H, Chiu JL, Linn MC. Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualisations in science curriculum materials. Stud Sci Educ. 2014;51:49–85.
Sabatello M, Chen Y, Sanderson SC, Chung WK, Appelbaum PS. Increasing genomic literacy among adolescents. Genet Med: Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2018;21:994–1000.
Stith BJ. Use of animation in teaching cell biology. Cell Biol Educ. 2004;3:181–8.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0018
Pollock E, Chandler P, Sweller J. Assimilating complex information. Learn Instr. 2002;12:61–86.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
Hwang I, Tam M, Lam SL, Lam P. Review of use of animation as a supplementary learning material of physiology content in four academic years. Electron J e-Learn. 2012;10:368.
Birch P, Adam S, Bansback N, Coe RR, Hicklin J, Lehman A, et al. DECIDE: a decision support tool to facilitate parents' choices regarding genome-wide sequencing. J Genet Couns. 2016;25:1298–308.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9971-8
Ofcom. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report. 2016.
Genomics England. The 100,000 Genomes Project Protocol. Institution, 2015, https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GenomicEnglandProtocol_030315_v8.pdf , Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
Mayer RE, Moreno R. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2002; 14.
Sanderson SC, Loe BS, Freeman M, Gabriel C, Stevenson DC, Gibbons C, et al. Development of the Knowledge of Genome Sequencing (KOGS) questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:1966–72.
Lewis C, Loe BS, Sidey-Gibbons C, Patch C, Chitty LS, Sanderson SC. Development of a measure of genome sequencing knowledge for young people: the kids-KOGS. Clin Genet. 2019;96:411–7.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Wou K, Weitz T, McCormack C, Wynn J, Spiegel E, Giordano J, et al. Parental perceptions of prenatal whole exome sequencing (PPPWES) study. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:801–11.
Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C, Griffin G, Christman MF, Pyeritz RE, et al. Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genom. 2012;15:22–30.
doi: 10.1159/000327296
Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Suckiel SA, Zinberg R, Wasserstein M, Kasarskis A, et al. Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25:280–92.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178
Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV:. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:253–68.
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.116
Skinner D, Raspberry KA, King M. The nuanced negative: Meanings of a negative diagnostic result in clinical exome sequencing. Sociol Health Illn. 2016;38:1303–17.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12460
Wynn J, Ottman R, Duong J, Wilson AL, Ahimaz P, Martinez J, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: a survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact. Clin Genet. 2017;93:1039–48.
Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, Purushotham A, Sturmey G, Gager M. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. 2015;350:g7714.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714
Ruland CM, Starren J, Vatne TM. Participatory design with children in the development of a support system for patient-centered care in pediatric oncology. J Biomed Inform. 2008;41:624–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.10.004
O'Brien N, Heaven B, Teal G, Evans EH, Cleland C, Moffatt S, et al. Integrating evidence from systematic reviews, qualitative research, and expert knowledge using co-design techniques to develop a web-based intervention for people in the retirement transition. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e210.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.5790
Ferguson M, Leighton P, Brandreth M, Wharrad H. Development of a multimedia educational programme for first-time hearing aid users: a participatory design. Int J Audiol. 2018;57:600–9.
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1457803
Latif A, Carter T, Rychwalska-Brown L, Wharrad H, Manning J. Co-producing a digital educational programme for registered children's nurses to improve care of children and young people admitted with self-harm. J Child Health Care. 2017;21:191–200.
doi: 10.1177/1367493517697853
Coyne I, Prizeman G, Sheehan A, Malone H, While AE. An e-health intervention to support the transition of young people with long-term illnesses to adult healthcare services: design and early use. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1496–504.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.005