Validation of a competence-based assessment of medical students' performance in the physician's role.
Argument-based validation
Competence-based assessment
Competences
Performance-based assessment
Psychological assessment
Simulation
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2020
07 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2019
accepted:
22
12
2019
entrez:
9
1
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Assessing competence of advanced undergraduate medical students based on performance in the clinical context is the ultimate, yet challenging goal for medical educators to provide constructive alignment between undergraduate medical training and professional work of physicians. Therefore, we designed and validated a performance-based 360-degree assessment for competences of advanced undergraduate medical students. This study was conducted in three steps: 1) Ten facets of competence considered to be most important for beginning residents were determined by a ranking study with 102 internists and 100 surgeons. 2) Based on these facets of competence we developed a 360-degree assessment simulating a first day of residency. Advanced undergraduate medical students (year 5 and 6) participated in the physician's role. Additionally knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice test. The assessment was performed twice (t Our assessment proved to be well operationalised to enable undergraduate medical students to show their competences in performance on the higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Its generalisability was underscored by its authenticity in respect of workplace reality and its underlying facets of competence relevant for beginning residents. The moderate concordance with facets of competence of the validated GAP-test provides arguments of convergent validity for our assessment. Since five aspects of Messick's validation approach could be defended, our competence-based 360-degree assessment format shows good arguments for its validity. According to these validation arguments, our assessment instrument seems to be a good option to assess competence in advanced undergraduate medical students in a summative or formative way. Developments towards assessment of postgraduate medical trainees should be explored.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Assessing competence of advanced undergraduate medical students based on performance in the clinical context is the ultimate, yet challenging goal for medical educators to provide constructive alignment between undergraduate medical training and professional work of physicians. Therefore, we designed and validated a performance-based 360-degree assessment for competences of advanced undergraduate medical students.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was conducted in three steps: 1) Ten facets of competence considered to be most important for beginning residents were determined by a ranking study with 102 internists and 100 surgeons. 2) Based on these facets of competence we developed a 360-degree assessment simulating a first day of residency. Advanced undergraduate medical students (year 5 and 6) participated in the physician's role. Additionally knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice test. The assessment was performed twice (t
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our assessment proved to be well operationalised to enable undergraduate medical students to show their competences in performance on the higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Its generalisability was underscored by its authenticity in respect of workplace reality and its underlying facets of competence relevant for beginning residents. The moderate concordance with facets of competence of the validated GAP-test provides arguments of convergent validity for our assessment. Since five aspects of Messick's validation approach could be defended, our competence-based 360-degree assessment format shows good arguments for its validity.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
According to these validation arguments, our assessment instrument seems to be a good option to assess competence in advanced undergraduate medical students in a summative or formative way. Developments towards assessment of postgraduate medical trainees should be explored.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31910843
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1919-x
pii: 10.1186/s12909-019-1919-x
pmc: PMC6947905
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01PK1501A/B/C
Références
Ann Anat. 2017 Jul;212:55-60
pubmed: 28434911
Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983-1002
pubmed: 26172347
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):9
pubmed: 30616684
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 15;36(6):Doc83
pubmed: 31844655
J Surg Educ. 2017 May - Jun;74(3):513-518
pubmed: 28017288
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1772-6
pubmed: 20881825
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):275-287
pubmed: 29032415
Med Teach. 2012;34(1):30-7
pubmed: 22250673
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 May;18(2):291-303
pubmed: 22484964
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr 19;:null
pubmed: 29672907
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):154
pubmed: 28882189
Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):e1447-63
pubmed: 23968324
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Mar 18;138(6):476-81
pubmed: 12639081
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 09;145:w14080
pubmed: 25664721
Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):266-72
pubmed: 20107354
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7
pubmed: 2400509
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e013656
pubmed: 28087554
Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):98-106
pubmed: 15612906
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 Aug;19(3):409-27
pubmed: 23529821
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676-82
pubmed: 20662580
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 09;14:115
pubmed: 24912500
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):631-7
pubmed: 20662573
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Dec;18(5):1009-27
pubmed: 23400369
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705
pubmed: 15528286
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013 Nov 15;30(4):Doc47
pubmed: 24282450
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):46
pubmed: 30728006
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):346-54
pubmed: 23916674
Perspect Med Educ. 2013 Nov;2(5-6):290-7
pubmed: 24142879
Clin Teach. 2012 Aug;9(4):228-32
pubmed: 22783854
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):513-22
pubmed: 22361800
Med Educ. 2013 Aug;47(8):832-41
pubmed: 23837430