Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
ACMG
BRCA1
VUS
coldspot
variant classification
Journal
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
ISSN: 1530-0366
Titre abrégé: Genet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815831
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
17
07
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
pubmed:
9
1
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
9
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Guidelines for variant interpretation incorporate variant hotspots in critical functional domains as evidence for pathogenicity (e.g., PM1 and PP2), but do not use "coldspots," that is, regions without essential functions that tolerate variation, as evidence a variant is benign. To improve variant classification we evaluated BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants reported in ClinVar to identify regions where pathogenic missenses are extremely infrequent, defined as coldspots. We used Bayesian approaches to model variant classification in these regions. BRCA1 exon 11 (~60% of the coding sequence), and BRCA2 exons 10 and 11 (~65% of the coding sequence), are coldspots. Of 89 pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) missense variants in BRCA1, none are in exon 11 (odds <0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-0.01). Of 34 P or LP missense variants in BRCA2, none are in exons 10-11 (odds <0.01, 95% CI 0.0-0.01). More than half of reported missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are in coldspots (3115/5301 = 58.8%). Reclassifying these 3115 VUS as likely benign would substantially improve variant classification. In BRCA1 and BRCA2 coldspots, missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic. Classification schemes that incorporate coldspots can reduce the number of VUS and mitigate risks from reporting benign variation as VUS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31911673
doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0740-6
pii: S1098-3600(21)00854-6
pmc: PMC7200594
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
825-830Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197458
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA234394
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007454
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA097186
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Henrie A, Hemphill SE, Ruiz-Schultz N, et al. ClinVar Miner: demonstrating utility of a Web-based tool for viewing and filtering ClinVar data. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1051–1060.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23555
Macklin SK, Jackson JL, Atwal PS, et al. Physician interpretation of variants of uncertain significance. Fam Cancer. 2019;18:121–126.
doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0086-2
Robson M, Goessl C, Domchek S. Olaparib for metastatic germline BRCA-mutated breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1792–1793.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706450
Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055–1062.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.188
Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM. Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:80–87.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn442
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian (version 2.2019). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf . Accessed 12 October 2018.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30
Macklin S, Durand N, Atwal P, et al. Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic. Genet Med. 2018;20:346–350.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.207
Eccles BK, Copson E, Maishman T, et al. Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:936.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1934-1
Kurian AW, Li Y, Hamilton AS, et al. Gaps in incorporating germline genetic testing into treatment decision-making for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2232–2239.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6480
Hart SN, Hoskin T, Shimelis H, et al. Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models. Genet Med. 2019;21:71–80.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0018-4
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D862–868.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1222
Mesman RLS, Calléja FMGR, Hendriks G, et al. The functional impact of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Genet Med. 2019;21:293–302.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0052-2
Toland AE, Andreassen PR. DNA repair-related functional assays for the classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: a critical review and needs assessment. J Med Genet. 2017;54:721–731.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104707
Jerde TJ. Phosphatase and tensin homologue: novel regulation by developmental signaling. J Signal Transduct. 2015;2015:282567.
doi: 10.1155/2015/282567
Bouwman P, Gulden H, van der Heijden I, et al. A high-throughput functional complementation assay for classification of BRCA1 missense variants. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1142–1155.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0094
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.
Tavtigian SV, Greenblatt MS, Harrison SM. et al. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Genet Med. 2018;20:1054–1060.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.210
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1062–D1067.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1153
Santos C, Peixoto A, Rocha P, et al. Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:324–334.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.005
Whiley PJ, Parsons MT, Leary J, et al. Multifactorial likelihood assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants confirms that BRCA1:c.122A>G(p.His41Arg) is a pathogenic mutation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86836.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086836
Wappenschmidt B, Becker AA, Hauke J, et al. Analysis of 30 putative BRCA1 splicing mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families identifies exonic splice site mutations that escape in silico prediction. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50800.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050800
Brandão RD, van Roozendaal K, Tserpelis D, et al. Characterisation of unclassified variants in the BRCA1/2 genes with a putative effect on splicing. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;129:971–982.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1599-7
Machackova E, Foretova L, Lukesova M, et al. Spectrum and characterisation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations in high-risk Czech patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:140.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-140
Vos J, Otten W, van Asperen C, et al. The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psychooncology. 2008;17:822–830.
doi: 10.1002/pon.1311
Kelly MA, Caleshu C, Morales A, et al. Adaptation and validation of the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework for MYH7-associated inherited cardiomyopathies: recommendations by ClinGen’s Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel. Genet Med. 2018;20:351–359.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.218
Gelb BD, Cavé H, Dillon MW. et al. ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel consensus methods for variant interpretation. Genet Med. 2018;20:1334–1345.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.3
Mester JL, Ghosh R, Pesaran T, et al. Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1581–1592.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23636
Starita LM, Young DL, Islam M, et al. Massively parallel functional analysis of BRCA1 RING domain variants. Genetics. 2015;200:413–422.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.175802
Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, et al. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 2018;562:217–222.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z
Lee MS, Green R, Marsillac SM, et al. Comprehensive analysis of missense variations in the BRCT domain of BRCA1 by structural and functional assays. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4880–4890.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4563
Woods NT, Baskin R, Golubeva V, et al. Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance. npj Genom Med. 2016;1:16001.
doi: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.1
Guidugli L, Carreira A, Caputo SM, et al. Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:151–164.
doi: 10.1002/humu.22478
Guidugli L, Shimelis H, Masica DL, et al. Assessment of the clinical relevance of BRCA2 missense variants by functional and computational approaches. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:233–248.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.013
Guidugli L, Pankratz VS, Singh N, et al. A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity. Cancer Res. 2013;73:265–275.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2081
Conley JM, Cook-Deegan R, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Myriad after myriad: the proprietary data dilemma. N C J Law Technol. 2014;15:597–637.
pubmed: 25544836
pmcid: 4275833
Cook-Deegan R, Conley JM, Evans JP, et al. The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:585–588.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.217
Lawler M, Maughan T. From Rosalind Franklin to Barack Obama: data sharing challenges and solutions in genomics and personalised medicine. New Bioeth. 2017;23:64–73.
doi: 10.1080/20502877.2017.1314883
Sivley RM, Dou X, Meiler J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of constraint on the spatial distribution of missense variants in human protein structures. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102:415–426.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.01.017