Negative supercoil at gene boundaries modulates gene topology.


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 30 04 2019
accepted: 25 11 2019
pubmed: 24 1 2020
medline: 6 5 2020
entrez: 24 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Transcription challenges the integrity of replicating chromosomes by generating topological stress and conflicts with forks

Identifiants

pubmed: 31969709
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1934-4
pii: 10.1038/s41586-020-1934-4
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Cruciform 0
DNA, Fungal 0
DNA, Superhelical 0
HMO1 protein, S cerevisiae 0
High Mobility Group Proteins 0
Nucleosomes 0
RNA, Fungal 0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins 0
TOP2 protein, S cerevisiae 0
RNA Polymerase II EC 2.7.7.-
TOP1 protein, S cerevisiae EC 5.99.1.1
DNA Topoisomerases, Type I EC 5.99.1.2
DNA Topoisomerases, Type II EC 5.99.1.3

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

701-705

Références

Bermejo, R., Lai, M. S. & Foiani, M. Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription. Mol. Cell 45, 710–718 (2012).
pubmed: 22464441 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.001
García-Muse, T. & Aguilera, A. Transcription-replication conflicts: how they occur and how they are resolved. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 553–563 (2016).
pubmed: 27435505 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.88
Bermejo, R. et al. Genome-organizing factors Top2 and Hmo1 prevent chromosome fragility at sites of S phase transcription. Cell 138, 870–884 (2009).
pubmed: 19737516 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.022
Sperling, A. S., Jeong, K. S., Kitada, T. & Grunstein, M. Topoisomerase II binds nucleosome-free DNA and acts redundantly with topoisomerase I to enhance recruitment of RNA Pol II in budding yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12693–12698 (2011).
pubmed: 21771901 pmcid: 3150916 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106834108
Wang, J. C. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 430–440 (2002).
pubmed: 12042765 doi: 10.1038/nrm831
Pedersen, J. M. et al. DNA topoisomerases maintain promoters in a state competent for transcriptional activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genetics 8, e1003128 (2012).
pubmed: 23284296 pmcid: 3527272 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003128
Liu, L. F. & Wang, J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7024–7027 (1987).
pubmed: 2823250 pmcid: 299221 doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024
Postow, L., Crisona, N. J., Peter, B. J., Hardy, C. D. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8219–8226 (2001).
pubmed: 11459956 pmcid: 37424 doi: 10.1073/pnas.111006998
Schvartzman, J. B. & Stasiak, A. A topological view of the replicon. EMBO Rep. 5, 256–261 (2004).
pubmed: 14993926 pmcid: 1299012 doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400101
Lal, A. et al. Genome scale patterns of supercoiling in a bacterial chromosome. Nat. Commun. 7, 11055 (2016).
pubmed: 27025941 pmcid: 4820846 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11055
Bermúdez, I., García-Martínez, J., Pérez-Ortín, J. E. & Roca, J. A method for genome-wide analysis of DNA helical tension by means of psoralen-DNA photobinding. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e182 (2010).
pubmed: 20685815 pmcid: 2965259 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq687
Naughton, C. et al. Transcription forms and remodels supercoiling domains unfolding large-scale chromatin structures. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 387–395 (2013).
pubmed: 23416946 pmcid: 3689368 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2509
Kouzine, F. et al. Transcription-dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 396–403 (2013).
pubmed: 23416947 pmcid: 3594045 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2517
Sinden, R. R., Carlson, J. O. & Pettijohn, D. E. Torsional tension in the DNA double helix measured with trimethylpsoralen in living E. coli cells: analogous measurements in insect and human cells. Cell 21, 773–783 (1980).
pubmed: 6254668 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90440-7
Perales, R. & Bentley, D. “Cotranscriptionality”: the transcription elongation complex as a nexus for nuclear transactions. Mol. Cell 36, 178–191 (2009).
pubmed: 19854129 pmcid: 2770090 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.018
Bermejo, R. et al. Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 21, 1921–1936 (2007).
pubmed: 17671091 pmcid: 1935030 doi: 10.1101/gad.432107
Boguslawski, S. J. et al. Characterization of monoclonal antibody to DNA. RNA and its application to immunodetection of hybrids. J. Immunol. Methods 89, 123–130 (1986).
pubmed: 2422282 doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90040-2
Chan, Y. A. et al. Genome-wide profiling of yeast DNA:RNA hybrid prone sites with DRIP-chip. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004288 (2014).
pubmed: 24743342 pmcid: 3990523 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004288
Hamperl, S. & Cimprich, K. A. The contribution of co-transcriptional RNA:DNA hybrid structures to DNA damage and genome instability. DNA Repair 19, 84–94 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.023
Rossi, S. E., Ajazi, A., Carotenuto, W., Foiani, M. & Giannattasio, M. Rad53-mediated regulation of Rrm3 and Pif1 DNA helicases contributes to prevention of aberrant fork transitions under replication stress. Cell Rep. 13, 80–92 (2015).
pubmed: 26411679 pmcid: 4597105 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.073
Hazelbaker, D. Z., Marquardt, S., Wlotzka, W. & Buratowski, S. Kinetic competition between RNA Polymerase II and Sen1-dependent transcription termination. Mol. Cell 49, 55–66 (2013).
pubmed: 23177741 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.014
Skourti-Stathaki, K., Kamieniarz-Gdula, K. & Proudfoot, N. J. R-loops induce repressive chromatin marks over mammalian gene terminators. Nature 516, 436–439 (2014).
pubmed: 25296254 pmcid: 4272244 doi: 10.1038/nature13787
Tuduri, S. et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1315–1324 (2009).
pubmed: 19838172 pmcid: 2912930 doi: 10.1038/ncb1984
Fachinetti, D. et al. Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements. Mol. Cell 39, 595–605 (2010).
pubmed: 20797631 pmcid: 3041477 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.024
Chen, S., Reger, R., Miller, C. & Hyman, L. E. Transcriptional terminators of RNA polymerase II are associated with yeast replication origins. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2885–2893 (1996).
pubmed: 8760869 pmcid: 146059 doi: 10.1093/nar/24.15.2885
Gartenberg, M. R. & Wang, J. C. Positive supercoiling of DNA greatly diminishes mRNA synthesis in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11461–11465 (1992).
pubmed: 1333610 pmcid: 50571 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11461
Li, X. et al. Long-read ChIA-PET for base-pair-resolution mapping of haplotype-specific chromatin interactions. Nat. Protocols 12, 899–915 (2017).
pubmed: 28358394 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.012
O’Sullivan, J. M. et al. Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat. Genet. 36, 1014–1018 (2004).
pubmed: 15314641 doi: 10.1038/ng1411
Levens, D., Baranello, L. & Kouzine, F. Controlling gene expression by DNA mechanics: emerging insights and challenges. Biophys. Rev. 8, 259–268 (2016).
pubmed: 28510225 pmcid: 5425794 doi: 10.1007/s12551-016-0216-8
Rovinskiy, N., Agbleke, A. A., Chesnokova, O., Pang, Z. & Higgins, N. P. Rates of gyrase supercoiling and transcription elongation control supercoil density in a bacterial chromosome. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002845 (2012).
pubmed: 22916023 pmcid: 3420936 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002845
Patterton, H. G. & von Holt, C. Negative supercoiling and nucleosome cores. I. The effect of negative supercoiling on the efficiency of nucleosome core formation in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 229, 623–636 (1993).
pubmed: 8433363 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1068
Ma, J., Bai, L. & Wang, M. D. Transcription under torsion. Science 340, 1580–1583 (2013).
pubmed: 23812716 pmcid: 5657242 doi: 10.1126/science.1235441
Kouzine, F. et al. Permanganate/S1 nuclease footprinting reveals non-B DNA structures with regulatory potential across a mammalian genome. Cell Syst. 4, 344–356 (2017).
pubmed: 28237796 pmcid: 7432990 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.013
Lilley, D. M. DNA opens up—supercoiling and heavy breathing. Trends Genet. 4, 111–114 (1988).
pubmed: 3070859 doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90099-6
Murchie, A. I. & Lilley, D. M. Supercoiled DNA and cruciform structures. Methods Enzymol. 211, 158–180 (1992).
pubmed: 1406306 doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)11010-G
Pöhler, J. R. G., Norman, D. G., Bramham, J., Bianchi, M. E. & Lilley, D. M. HMG box proteins bind to four-way DNA junctions in their open conformation. EMBO J. 17, 817–826 (1998).
doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.3.817
Murugesapillai, D. et al. DNA bridging and looping by HMO1 provides a mechanism for stabilizing nucleosome-free chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8996–9004 (2014).
pubmed: 25063301 pmcid: 4132745 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku635
Tan-Wong, S. M., Wijayatilake, H. D. & Proudfoot, N. J. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev. 23, 2610–2624 (2009).
pubmed: 19933151 pmcid: 2779764 doi: 10.1101/gad.1823209
Saponaro, M. et al. RECQL5 controls transcript elongation and suppresses genome instability associated with transcription stress. Cell 157, 1037–1049 (2014).
pubmed: 24836610 pmcid: 4032574 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.048
Cheung, A. C. & Cramer, P. Structural basis of RNA polymerase II backtracking, arrest and reactivation. Nature 471, 249–253 (2011).
pubmed: 21346759 doi: 10.1038/nature09785
Drolet, M. et al. Overexpression of RNase H partially complements the growth defect of an Escherichia coli delta topA mutant: R-loop formation is a major problem in the absence of DNA topoisomerase I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3526–3530 (1995).
pubmed: 7536935 pmcid: 42200 doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3526
Meng, F. L. et al. Convergent transcription at intragenic super-enhancers targets AID-initiated genomic instability. Cell 159, 1538–1548 (2014).
pubmed: 25483776 pmcid: 4322776 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.014
Husain, A. et al. Chromatin remodeller SMARCA4 recruits topoisomerase 1 and suppresses transcription-associated genomic instability. Nat. Commun. 7, 10549 (2016).
pubmed: 26842758 pmcid: 4742980 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10549
Fernández, X., Díaz-Ingelmo, O., Martínez-García, B. & Roca, J. Chromatin regulates DNA torsional energy via topoisomerase II-mediated relaxation of positive supercoils. EMBO J. 33, 1492–1501 (2014).
pubmed: 24859967 pmcid: 4194091 doi: 10.15252/embj.201488091
Brown, P. O. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Catenation and knotting of duplex DNA by type 1 topoisomerases: a mechanistic parallel with type 2 topoisomerases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 843–847 (1981).
pubmed: 6262776 pmcid: 319899 doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.843
Thomas, B. J. & Rothstein, R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56, 619–630 (1989).
pubmed: 2645056 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9
Bermejo, R., Katou, Y. M., Shirahige, K. & Foiani, M. ChIP-on-chip analysis of DNA topoisomerases. Methods Mol. Biol. 582, 103–118 (2009).
pubmed: 19763945 doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-340-4_9
Rodriguez, J., McKnight, J. N. & Tsukiyama, T. Genome-wide analysis of nucleosome positions, occupancy, and accessibility in yeast: nucleosome mapping, high-resolution histone ChIP, and NCAM. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 108, 21.28.1–21.28.16 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2128s108
Droit, A., Cheung, C. & Gottardo, R. rMAT–an R/Bioconductor package for analyzing ChIP-chip experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 678–679 (2010).
pubmed: 20089513 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq023
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278 pmcid: 2832824 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
pubmed: 21816040 pmcid: 3163565 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323
Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014).
pubmed: 24799436 pmcid: 4086134 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku365
Chen, K. et al. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res. 23, 341–351 (2013).
pubmed: 23193179 pmcid: 3561875 doi: 10.1101/gr.142067.112
Zhou, X. et al. The human epigenome browser at Washington University. Nat. Methods 8, 989–990 (2011).
pubmed: 22127213 pmcid: 3552640 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1772

Auteurs

Yathish Jagadheesh Achar (YJ)

IFOM (Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare), Milan, Italy. yathish.achar@ifom.eu.

Mohamood Adhil (M)

IFOM (Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare), Milan, Italy.

Ramveer Choudhary (R)

IFOM (Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare), Milan, Italy.

Nick Gilbert (N)

Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Marco Foiani (M)

IFOM (Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare), Milan, Italy. marco.foiani@ifom.eu.
Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. marco.foiani@ifom.eu.

Articles similaires

T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory Lung Neoplasms Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Animals Humans

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis

Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.

Areerat Hnoonual, Sunita Kaewfai, Chanin Limwongse et al.
1.00
Humans Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Thailand Male Female
Humans Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Pancreatic Neoplasms T-Lymphocytes

Classifications MeSH