Comparing the two-finger versus two-thumb technique for single person infant CPR: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Cerebral vascular circulation Compression depth Infant Pulmonary ventilation Systematic review

Journal

Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2020
Historique:
received: 08 09 2019
revised: 22 12 2019
accepted: 31 12 2019
pubmed: 24 1 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 24 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current guidelines recommend that single person cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on an infant should be performed with two-fingers just below the inter-mammillary line with the hand clenched, while two-person CPR should be performed with two-thumbs with the hands encircling the chest. Those recommendations are based on literature that demonstrates higher quality chest compressions with the two-thumb technique, with concerns that this technique may compromise ventilation parameters when performed by the single rescuer. The purpose of this study is to compare the two compression techniques' performance during CPR using both compression and ventilation parameters. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature identified through a search of PubMed and One-Search comparing the quality of chest compressions and ventilation parameters between the two-thumb and two-finger techniques (Prospero registration # CRD42018087672). We identified 20 manuscripts examining single person infant CPR that met study criteria, with 16 that included data suitable for meta-analysis. All of the studies included in the analysis were performed on a standardized manikin. Overall, the two-thumb technique resulted in a mean difference of 5.61 mm greater compression depth compared to the two-finger technique, with 36.91% more compressions of adequate depth per national guidelines. Interestingly, ventilation parameters did not differ between the two techniques. While recognizing that the results of this review may differ from actual clinical experience due to the lack of fidelity between manikins and actual human infants, this systematic review with meta-analysis demonstrates that when CPR is performed on a simulated infant manikin by a single rescuer, the two-thumb technique with hands encircling the chest improves chest compression quality and does not appear to compromise ventilation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31972228
pii: S0300-9572(20)30023-X
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.039
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

161-172

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Michael G Millin (MG)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: mmillin2@jhmi.edu.

David Bogumil (D)

Research Assistant and PhD Candidate, Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, United States.

Jennifer N Fishe (JN)

Department of Emergency Medicine - Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, United States.

Rita V Burke (RV)

Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH