Differential significance of molecular subtypes which were classified into EGFR exon 19 deletion on the first line afatinib monotherapy.
Adult
Afatinib
/ administration & dosage
Aged
Alleles
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ diagnosis
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Exons
Female
Genetic Association Studies
Genotype
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Recurrence
Sequence Deletion
Afatinib
EGFR mutation
Exon 19 deletion
Molecular subtypes
NSCLC
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2020
06 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2019
accepted:
31
01
2020
entrez:
8
2
2020
pubmed:
8
2
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing mutation, exon 19 deletion consists of several molecular variants. Influences of these variants on clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain elusive. West Japan Oncology Group 8114LTR is a prospective, multi-institutional biomarker study. Treatment naïve, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation received afatinib monotherapy. We conducted a preplanned subset analysis of patients harboring exon 19 deletion. Tumor tissue exon 19 deletion molecular variants were identified by blocking-oligo-dependent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by Luminex Technology. Plasma cfDNA was also obtained before and after the treatment and EGFR mutations were detected with multiplexed, pico-droplet digital PCR assay. Among 57 registered patients, twenty-nine patients were exon 19 deletion. Tissue DNA and cfDNA were available in 26 patients. Among the detected seven molecular variants, the most frequent was p.E746_A750delELREA (65.4%). According to the various classifications of molecular variants, twenty one (80.8%) were classified into 15-nucleotide deletion, one (3.8%) into 18-nucleotide deletion, and four patients (15.4%) into other insertion/substitution variant subgroups. The patient subgroup with 15-nucleotide deletion showed significantly longer progression-free survival than patients in other mixed insertion/substitution variant subgroup (p = 0.0244). The clinical significance of molecular variants of exon 19 deletion on the first line afatinib monotherapy is reported here for the first time. Further investigation is needed for development of better therapeutic strategies. This trial was registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry at 2014/12/4 (UMIN000015847).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing mutation, exon 19 deletion consists of several molecular variants. Influences of these variants on clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain elusive.
METHODS
METHODS
West Japan Oncology Group 8114LTR is a prospective, multi-institutional biomarker study. Treatment naïve, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation received afatinib monotherapy. We conducted a preplanned subset analysis of patients harboring exon 19 deletion. Tumor tissue exon 19 deletion molecular variants were identified by blocking-oligo-dependent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by Luminex Technology. Plasma cfDNA was also obtained before and after the treatment and EGFR mutations were detected with multiplexed, pico-droplet digital PCR assay.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 57 registered patients, twenty-nine patients were exon 19 deletion. Tissue DNA and cfDNA were available in 26 patients. Among the detected seven molecular variants, the most frequent was p.E746_A750delELREA (65.4%). According to the various classifications of molecular variants, twenty one (80.8%) were classified into 15-nucleotide deletion, one (3.8%) into 18-nucleotide deletion, and four patients (15.4%) into other insertion/substitution variant subgroups. The patient subgroup with 15-nucleotide deletion showed significantly longer progression-free survival than patients in other mixed insertion/substitution variant subgroup (p = 0.0244).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical significance of molecular variants of exon 19 deletion on the first line afatinib monotherapy is reported here for the first time. Further investigation is needed for development of better therapeutic strategies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This trial was registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry at 2014/12/4 (UMIN000015847).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32028909
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6593-1
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-6593-1
pmc: PMC7006223
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Afatinib
41UD74L59M
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103Références
Cancer Sci. 2007 Dec;98(12):1817-24
pubmed: 17888036
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 1;12(13):3908-14
pubmed: 16818686
Transl Oncol. 2014 Jun 17;7(3):341-8
pubmed: 25180058
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 14;13(12):e0209384
pubmed: 30550608
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42164
pubmed: 22848739
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):529-538
pubmed: 27908825
Med Oncol. 2018 Jan 31;35(3):28
pubmed: 29387949
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 May;77(5):1019-29
pubmed: 27042857
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1742-51
pubmed: 18375904
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 17;116(2):175-185
pubmed: 28006816
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3470-7
pubmed: 22510346
EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:86-93
pubmed: 28625519
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;18(6):1490-2
pubmed: 22317760
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 1;21(15):3552-60
pubmed: 25882755
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;12(3 Pt 1):839-44
pubmed: 16467097
Lung Cancer. 2014 Nov;86(2):213-8
pubmed: 25304185
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):577-89
pubmed: 27083334
Trends Mol Med. 2004 Oct;10(10):481-6
pubmed: 15464447
Oncogene. 2009 Aug;28 Suppl 1:S24-31
pubmed: 19680293
Lung Cancer. 2019 May;131:128-133
pubmed: 31027689
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34
pubmed: 23816960
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):830-8
pubmed: 26051236
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22
pubmed: 24439929
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Jan;363(1-2):71-82
pubmed: 16102740
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 30;8(67):111246-111257
pubmed: 29340050
Science. 2004 Jun 4;304(5676):1497-500
pubmed: 15118125
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Sep;8(9):1148-55
pubmed: 23945384
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51
pubmed: 25589191