Targeted nanopore sequencing with Cas9-guided adapter ligation.
Journal
Nature biotechnology
ISSN: 1546-1696
Titre abrégé: Nat Biotechnol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9604648
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2019
accepted:
06
01
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
entrez:
12
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite recent improvements in sequencing methods, there remains a need for assays that provide high sequencing depth and comprehensive variant detection. Current methods
Identifiants
pubmed: 32042167
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0407-5
pii: 10.1038/s41587-020-0407-5
pmc: PMC7145730
mid: NIHMS1548342
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Guide
0
CRISPR-Associated Protein 9
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
433-438Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA130840
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA153952
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG009190
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007057
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM136577
Pays : United States
Références
Karamitros, T. & Magiorkinis, G. Multiplexed targeted sequencing for Oxford Nanopore MinION: a detailed library preparation procedure. Methods Mol. Biol. 1712, 43–51 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7514-3_4
Leija-Salazar, M. et al. Evaluation of the detection of GBA missense mutations and other variants using the Oxford Nanopore MinION. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 7, e564 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.564
Gabrieli, T. et al. Selective nanopore sequencing of human BRCA1 by Cas9-assisted targeting of chromosome segments (CATCH). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e87 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky411
Giesselmann, P. et al. Analysis of short tandem repeat expansions and their methylation state with nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1478–1481 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0293-x
Kozarewa, I., Armisen, J., Gardner, A. F., Slatko, B. E. & Hendrickson, C. L. Overview of target enrichment strategies. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 112, 7.21.1–7.21.23 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0721s112
Eberle, M. A. et al. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree. Genome Res. 27, 157–164 (2017).
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C. & Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62–67 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nature13011
Forbes, S. A. et al. COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D777–D783 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1121
Lee, I. et al. Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/504993 (2018).
Messier, T. L. et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 acetylation and methylation dynamics define breast cancer subtypes. Oncotarget 7, 5094–5109 (2016).
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6922
Welcsh, P. L. & King, M. C. BRCA1 and BRCA2 and the genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 705–713 (2001).
doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.705
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509
Luo, R. et al. Clair: Exploring the limit of using a deep neural network on pileup data for germline variant calling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/865782 (2019).
Simpson, J. T. et al. Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods 14, 407–410 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4184
Martin, M. et al. WhatsHap: fast and accurate read-based phasing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/085050 (2016).
Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1015
Martignano, F. et al. GSTP1 methylation and protein expression in prostate cancer: diagnostic implications. Dis. Markers 2016, 4358292 (2016).
doi: 10.1155/2016/4358292
Kabir, N. N., Rönnstrand, L. & Kazi, J. U. Keratin 19 expression correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 7729–7735 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3684-6
Wang, X.-M., Zhang, Z., Pan, L.-H., Cao, X.-C. & Xiao, C. KRT19 and CEACAM5 mRNA-marked circulated tumor cells indicate unfavorable prognosis of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 174, 375–385 (2019).
Noguchi, S. et al. Detection of breast cancer micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes by means of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Comparison between MUC1 mRNA and keratin 19 mRNA amplification. Am. J. Pathol. 148, 649–656 (1996).
pubmed: 8579127
pmcid: 1861681
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0001-7
Zook, J. M. et al. Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials. Sci. Data 3, 160025 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.25
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
Vaser, R., Sović, I., Nagarajan, N. & Šikić, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746 (2017).
doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Chaisson, M. J. P. et al. Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/193144 (2018).
Audano, P. A. et al. Characterizing the major structural variant alleles of the human genome. Cell 176, 663–675.e19 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.019
Dixon, J. R. et al. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1388–1398 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0195-8
Timp, W. & Feinberg, A. P. Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 497–510 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/nrc3486
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14061
Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167
Hansen, K. D., Langmead, B. & Irizarry, R. A. BSmooth: from whole genome bisulfite sequencing reads to differentially methylated regions. Genome Biol. 13, R83 (2012).
doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r83