Model-based Comparisons of the Abundance Dynamics of Bacterial Communities in Two Lakes.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 02 2020
12 02 2020
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
accepted:
15
01
2020
entrez:
14
2
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lake Lanier (Georgia, USA) is home to more than 11,000 microbial Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), many of which exhibit clear annual abundance patterns. To assess the dynamics of this microbial community, we collected time series data of 16S and 18S rRNA gene sequences, recovered from 29 planktonic shotgun metagenomic datasets. Based on these data, we constructed a dynamic mathematical model of bacterial interactions in the lake and used it to analyze changes in the abundances of OTUs. The model accounts for interactions among 14 sub-communities (SCs), which are composed of OTUs blooming at the same time of the year, and three environmental factors. It captures the seasonal variations in abundances of the SCs quite well. Simulation results suggest that changes in water temperature affect the various SCs differentially and that the timing of perturbations is critical. We compared the model results with published results from Lake Mendota (Wisconsin, USA). These comparative analyses between lakes in two very different geographical locations revealed substantially more cooperation and less competition among species in the warmer Lake Lanier than in Lake Mendota.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32051429
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58769-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-58769-y
pmc: PMC7016141
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 18S
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2423Références
Shade, A. et al. Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front. Microbiol. 3, 417, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00417 (2012).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00417
pubmed: 23267351
pmcid: 3525951
Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W. & Schleifer, K. H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59, 143–169 (1995).
pubmed: 7535888
pmcid: 7535888
Voit, E. O. The best models of metabolism. WIREs Syst. Biol. Med. 9, e1391 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1391
Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853–856 (2010).
doi: 10.1126/science.1188321
Landi, P., Minoarivelo, H. O., Brännström, Å., Hui, C. & Dieckmann, U. Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory. Population Ecology 60, 319–345 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10144-018-0628-3
Delmas, E. et al. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biological Reviews 94 (2018).
Ives, A. R. Predicting the response of populations to environmental change. Ecology 76, 926–941 (1995).
doi: 10.2307/1939357
Hampton, S. E. et al. Quantifying effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on community dynamics with multivariate autoregressive (MAR) models. Ecology 94, 2663–2669 (2013).
doi: 10.1890/13-0996.1
Certain, G., Barraquand, F., Gårdmark, A., How & do, M. A. R. (1) models cope with hidden nonlinearities in ecological dynamics? Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1975–1995 (2018).
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. (Princeton University Press, 1973).
Mougi, A. & Kondoh, M. Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science 337, 349–351 (2012).
doi: 10.1126/science.1220529
Stein, R. R. et al. Ecological modeling from time-series inference: insight into dynamics and stability of intestinal microbiota. PLoS Comput Biol 9, e1003388, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003388 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003388
pubmed: 24348232
pmcid: 3861043
Dam, P., Fonseca, L. L., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Voit, E. O. Dynamic models of the complex microbial metapopulation of Lake Mendota. Nature pj Systems Biology And Applications 2, 16007 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/npjsba.2016.7
Oh, S. et al. Metagenomic insights into the evolution, function, and complexity of the planktonic microbial community of Lake Lanier, a temperate freshwater ecosystem. Applied and environmental microbiology 77, 6000–6011, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00107-11 (2011).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00107-11
pubmed: 21764968
pmcid: 3165412
Poretsky, R., Rodriguez, R. L., Luo, C., Tsementzi, D. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. PLoS One 9, e93827, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093827 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093827
pubmed: 24714158
pmcid: 3979728
NTL-LTER. 11 year time series, http://lter.limnology.wisc.edu (2011).
NTL-LTER. Chemical Limnology of North Temperate Lakes LTER Primary Study Lakes: Nutrients, pH and Carbon, http://lter.limnology.wisc.edu (2013).
Voit, E. O. & Chou, I.-C. Parameter estimation in canonical biological systems models. Int. J. Syst. Synth. Biol. 1, 1–19 (2010).
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. & Kutner, M. H. Applied Linear Statistical Models Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. Third edn, 443-452 (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1990).
Tamura, T. In The Prokaryotes: Actinobacteria (eds Eugene Rosenberg et al.) 883-888 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).
Stackebrandt, E. In The Prokaryotes: Actinobacteria (eds Eugene Rosenberg et al.) 5–12 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).
Fisher, C. K. & Mehta, P. Identifying keystone species in the human gut microbiome from metagenomic timeseries using sparse linear regression. PLoS One 9, e102451, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102451 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102451
pubmed: 25054627
pmcid: 4108331
Liu, F., Guo, Y. Z. & Li, Y. F. Interactions of microorganisms during natural spoilage of pork at 5 degrees C. J. Food Eng. 72, 24–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.015 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.015
Fuhrman, J. A. & Steele, J. A. Community structure of marine bacterioplankton: patterns, networks, and relationships to function. Aquat Microb Ecol 53, 69–81 (2008).
doi: 10.3354/ame01222
Fuhrman, J. A. et al. A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7774–7778 (2008).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803070105
Kara, E. L., Hanson, P. C., Hu, Y. H., Winslow, L. & McMahon, K. D. A decade of seasonal dynamics and co-occurrences within freshwater bacterioplankton communities from eutrophic Lake Mendota, WI, USA. The ISME journal 7, 680–684 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.118
Shade, A. et al. Interannual dynamics and phenology of bacterial communities in a eutrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr. 52, 487–494 (2007).
doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0487
Barberan, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O. & Fierer, N. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. The ISME journal 6, 343–351, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.119 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.119
pubmed: 21900968
Faust, K. et al. Microbial Co-occurrence Relationships in the Human Microbiome. Plos Comput Biol 8, e1002606 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606
Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring Correlation Networks from Genomic Survey Data. Plos Comput Biol 8, e1002687 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687
Gilbert, J. A. et al. Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. The ISME journal 6, 298–308, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.107 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.107
pubmed: 21850055
Ruan, Q. S. et al. Local similarity analysis reveals unique associations among marine bacterioplankton species and environmental factors. Bioinformatics 22, 2532–2538, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl417 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl417
pubmed: 16882654
Chaffron, S., Rehrauer, H., Pernthaler, J. & von Mering, C. A global network of coexisting microbes from environmental and whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res 20, 947–959, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.104521.109 (2010).
doi: 10.1101/gr.104521.109
pubmed: 20458099
pmcid: 2892096
Faust, K. & Raes, J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 538–550, https://doi.org/10.1038/Nrmicro2832 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/Nrmicro2832
pubmed: 22796884
Chou, I. C. & Voit, E. O. Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. Mathematical biosciences 219, 57–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.002 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.002
pubmed: 19327372
pmcid: 2693292
Bengtsson-Palme, J. et al. METAXA2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Molecular ecology resources 15, 1403–1414, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12399 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12399
pubmed: 25732605
Cox, M. P., Peterson, D. A. & Biggs, P. J. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 485, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485 (2010).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-485
pubmed: 20875133
pmcid: 20875133
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic acids research 41, D590–596, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219
pubmed: 23193283
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7, 335–336, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
pubmed: 3156573
pmcid: 3156573
Environmental Protection Division (Georgia Department of Natural Resources). Water Quality Data (2016).