Cardiac valvular abnormalities associated with use and cumulative exposure of cabergoline for hyperprolactinemia: the CATCH study.
Cabergoline
bromocriptine
dopamine agonist
heart valve diseases
hyperprolactinemia
risk factor
Journal
BMC endocrine disorders
ISSN: 1472-6823
Titre abrégé: BMC Endocr Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Feb 2020
19 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
03
04
2019
accepted:
13
02
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whether lower dose cabergoline therapy for hyperprolactinemia increases risk of valvular dysfunction remains controversial. We examined valvular abnormalities among asymptomatic adults with hyperprolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists. This cross-sectional study was conducted among adults receiving cabergoline or bromocriptine for > 12 months for hyperprolactinemia and had no cardiac-related symptoms. Cardiac valve morphology and function were assessed from transthoracic echocardiograms at the study visit (except for two participants) with evaluation performed blinded to type and duration of dopamine agonist received. Among 174 participants (mean age 49 ± 13 years, 63% women) without known structural heart disease before starting therapy, 62 received only cabergoline, 63 received only bromocriptine, and 49 received both. Median cabergoline use was 2.8 years in cabergoline only users and 3.2 years for those exposed to both cabergoline and bromocriptine; median bromocriptine use was 5.5 years in bromocriptine only users and 1.1 years for those exposed to both cabergoline and bromocriptine. Compared with bromocriptine only users (17.5%), regurgitation of ≥1 valve was more common for cabergoline only (37.1%, P = 0.02) but not for combined exposure (26.5%, P = 0.26). Compared with bromocriptine only exposure (1.6%), regurgitation of ≥2 valves was more common for cabergoline only (11.3%, P = 0.03) and combined exposure (12.2%, P = 0.04). Cabergoline only users had higher age-sex-adjusted odds for ≥1 valve with grade 2+ regurgitation compared to bromocriptine only users (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.3-7.5, P = 0.008), but the association for combined exposure to cabergoline and bromocriptine was not significant (aOR 1.7, 95%CI:0.7-4.3, P = 0.26). Compared to bromocriptine only, age-sex-adjusted odds of ≥2 valves with grade 2+ regurgitation were higher for both cabergoline only (aOR 8.4, 95% CI:1.0-72.2, P = 0.05) and combined exposure (aOR 8.8, 95% CI:1.0-75.8, P = 0.05). Cumulative cabergoline exposure > 115 mg was associated with a higher age-sex adjusted odds of ≥2 valves with grade 2+ regurgitation (aOR 9.6, 95%CI:1.1-81.3, P = 0.04) compared to bromocriptine only. Among community-based adults treated for hyperprolactinemia, cabergoline use and greater cumulative cabergoline exposure were associated with a higher prevalence of primarily mild valvular regurgitation compared with bromocriptine. Research is needed to clarify which patients treated with dopamine agonists may benefit from echocardiographic screening and surveillance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Whether lower dose cabergoline therapy for hyperprolactinemia increases risk of valvular dysfunction remains controversial. We examined valvular abnormalities among asymptomatic adults with hyperprolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists.
METHODS
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted among adults receiving cabergoline or bromocriptine for > 12 months for hyperprolactinemia and had no cardiac-related symptoms. Cardiac valve morphology and function were assessed from transthoracic echocardiograms at the study visit (except for two participants) with evaluation performed blinded to type and duration of dopamine agonist received.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 174 participants (mean age 49 ± 13 years, 63% women) without known structural heart disease before starting therapy, 62 received only cabergoline, 63 received only bromocriptine, and 49 received both. Median cabergoline use was 2.8 years in cabergoline only users and 3.2 years for those exposed to both cabergoline and bromocriptine; median bromocriptine use was 5.5 years in bromocriptine only users and 1.1 years for those exposed to both cabergoline and bromocriptine. Compared with bromocriptine only users (17.5%), regurgitation of ≥1 valve was more common for cabergoline only (37.1%, P = 0.02) but not for combined exposure (26.5%, P = 0.26). Compared with bromocriptine only exposure (1.6%), regurgitation of ≥2 valves was more common for cabergoline only (11.3%, P = 0.03) and combined exposure (12.2%, P = 0.04). Cabergoline only users had higher age-sex-adjusted odds for ≥1 valve with grade 2+ regurgitation compared to bromocriptine only users (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.3-7.5, P = 0.008), but the association for combined exposure to cabergoline and bromocriptine was not significant (aOR 1.7, 95%CI:0.7-4.3, P = 0.26). Compared to bromocriptine only, age-sex-adjusted odds of ≥2 valves with grade 2+ regurgitation were higher for both cabergoline only (aOR 8.4, 95% CI:1.0-72.2, P = 0.05) and combined exposure (aOR 8.8, 95% CI:1.0-75.8, P = 0.05). Cumulative cabergoline exposure > 115 mg was associated with a higher age-sex adjusted odds of ≥2 valves with grade 2+ regurgitation (aOR 9.6, 95%CI:1.1-81.3, P = 0.04) compared to bromocriptine only.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Among community-based adults treated for hyperprolactinemia, cabergoline use and greater cumulative cabergoline exposure were associated with a higher prevalence of primarily mild valvular regurgitation compared with bromocriptine. Research is needed to clarify which patients treated with dopamine agonists may benefit from echocardiographic screening and surveillance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32075620
doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-0507-8
pii: 10.1186/s12902-020-0507-8
pmc: PMC7031983
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dopamine Agonists
0
Cabergoline
LL60K9J05T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Subventions
Organisme : Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit Fund
ID : N/A
Références
J Endocrinol Invest. 2008 Dec;31(12):1119-23
pubmed: 19246980
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Jul;77(1):99-105
pubmed: 22211510
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Nov;303(2):815-22
pubmed: 12388668
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 4;356(1):6-9
pubmed: 17202450
Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Jul;167(1):17-25
pubmed: 22511808
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 20;349(21):2035-41
pubmed: 14627789
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;93(9):3348-56
pubmed: 18559921
Endocr Pract. 2008 Sep;14(6):672-7
pubmed: 18996784
Perm J. 2016 Fall;20(4):15-225
pubmed: 27548806
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2014 Mar;14(2):121-7
pubmed: 24449623
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Aug;77(2):275-80
pubmed: 22288503
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Sep;73(3):369-74
pubmed: 20550538
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):154-159
pubmed: 28217516
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Jan;72(1):53-8
pubmed: 19508591
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jul;16(7):777-802
pubmed: 12835667
Endocrine. 2017 Jan;55(1):239-245
pubmed: 27709470
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Sep 11;:
pubmed: 30215804
Br Heart J. 1988 Oct;60(4):299-308
pubmed: 3190958
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 4;356(1):29-38
pubmed: 17202453
Pituitary. 2012 Mar;15(1):44-9
pubmed: 21847572
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Mar;21(3):276-80
pubmed: 22231899
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 4;356(1):39-46
pubmed: 17202454
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan;99(1):90-6
pubmed: 24187407
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):4189-4194
pubmed: 27571182
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Jan;70(1):104-8
pubmed: 19128367
Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):344-9
pubmed: 18989898
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Oct 13;129(3):318-24
pubmed: 18571250
Neurology. 2004 Jul 27;63(2):301-4
pubmed: 15277624
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar;95(3):1025-33
pubmed: 20130078