Experiential Learning in Project-Based Quality Improvement Education: Questioning Assumptions and Identifying Future Directions.
Journal
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
ISSN: 1938-808X
Titre abrégé: Acad Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
22
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Project-based experiential learning is a defining element of quality improvement (QI) education despite ongoing challenges and uncertainties. The authors examined stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of QI project-based learning to increase understanding of factors that influence learning and project experiences. The authors used a case study approach to examine QI project-based learning in 3 advanced longitudinal QI programs, 2 at the University of Toronto and 1 at an academic tertiary-care hospital. From March 2016 to June 2017, they undertook 135 hours of education program observation and 58 interviews with learners, program directors, project coaches, and institutional leaders and reviewed relevant documents. They analyzed data using a conventional and directed data analysis approach. The findings provide insight into 5 key factors that influenced participants' project-based learning experiences and outcomes: (1) variable emphasis on learning versus project objectives and resulting benefits, tensions, and consequences; (2) challenges integrating the QI project into the curriculum timeline; (3) project coaching factors (e.g., ability, capacity, role clarity); (4) participants' differing access to resources and ability to direct a QI project given their professional roles; and (5) workplace environment influence on project success. The findings contribute to an empirical basis toward more effective experiential learning in QI by identifying factors to target and optimize. Expanding conceptualizations of project-based learning for QI education beyond learner-initiated, time-bound projects, which are at the core of many QI educational initiatives, may be necessary to improve learning and project outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32079957
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003203
pii: 00001888-202011000-00059
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1745-1754Références
Headrick LA, Richardson A, Priebe GP. Continuous improvement learning for residents. Pediatrics. 1998;1014, pt 2768–773
Varkey P, Reller MK, Smith A, Ponto J, Osborn M. An experiential interdisciplinary quality improvement education initiative. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:317–322
Kool B, Wise MR, Peiris-John R, Sadler L, Mahony F, Wells S. Is the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame? BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:91
Wong BM, Etchells EE, Kuper A, Levinson W, Shojania KG. Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: A systematic review. Acad Med. 2010;85:1425–1439
Runnacles J, Moult B, Lachman P. Developing future clinical leaders for quality improvement: Experience from a London children’s hospital. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:956–963
Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: Transforming theory into practice. Med Teach. 2012;34:161–164
Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE guide no. 63. Med Teach. 2012;34:e102–e115
McNamara DA, Rafferty P, Fitzpatrick F. An improvement model to optimise hospital interdisciplinary learning. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29:550–558
Stille CJ, Savageau JA, McBride J, Alper EJ. Quality improvement “201”: Context-relevant quality improvement leadership training for the busy clinician-educator. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27:98–105
O’Leary KJ, Fant AL, Thurk J, et al. Immediate and long-term effects of a team-based quality improvement training programme. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:366–373.
Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ. 2004;26:247–273
Dixon-Woods M, Martin GP. Does quality improvement improve quality? Future Hosp J. 2016;3:191–194
Zafar MA, Diers T, Schauer DP, Warm EJ. Connecting resident education to patient outcomes: The evolution of a quality improvement curriculum in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med. 2014;89:1341–1347
Wong BM, Levinson W, Shojania KG. Quality improvement in medical education: Current state and future directions. Med Educ. 2012;46:107–119
Butler JM, Anderson KA, Supiano MA, Weir CR. “It feels like a lot of extra work”: Resident attitudes about quality improvement and implications for an effective learning health care system. Acad Med. 2017;92:984–990
Hall Barber K, Schultz K, Scott A, Pollock E, Kotecha J, Martin D. Teaching quality improvement in graduate medical education: An experiential and team-based approach to the acquisition of quality improvement competencies. Acad Med. 2015;90:1363–1367
Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, Hogden E, Braithwaite J, Groene O. High performing hospitals: A qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:244
Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2010;88:500–559
Brandrud AS, Nyen B, Hjortdahl P, et al. Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare—A nationwide case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:648
Mery G, Dobrow MJ, Baker GR, Im J, Brown A. Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e012431
The Health Foundation. Evidence scan: Quality improvement training for healthcare professionals.https://www.health.org.uk/publications/quality-improvement-training-for-healthcare-professionals. Published 2012 Accessed June 16, 2019
Sargeant J, Wong BM, Campbell CM. CPD of the future: A partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education. Med Educ. 2018;52:125–135
Davis DA, Rayburn WF. Integrating continuing professional development with health system reform: Building pillars of support. Acad Med. 2016;91:26–29
Boblin SL, Ireland S, Kirkpatrick H, Robertson K. Using stake’s qualitative case study approach to explore implementation of evidence-based practice. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:1267–1275
Simons HCase Study Research in Practice. 2009.London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd;
Caronna CA. Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R, eds. Why use qualitative methods to study health care organizations? Insights from multi-level case studies. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. 2010.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd;
Stake R. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Case studies. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2000.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd;
Patton MQQualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 2002.3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd;
Green J, Thorogood NQualitative Methods for Health Research. 2004.London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd;
Ayres L, Kavanaugh K, Knafl KA. Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qual Health Res. 2003;13:871–883
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Laimputtong P, ed. Thematic analysis. In: Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. 2019.Singapore: Springer;
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288
Flick U. Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? J Theory Soc Behav. 1992;22:175–197
Sholl S, Ajjawi R, Allbutt H, et al. Balancing health care education and patient care in the UK workplace: A realist synthesis. Med Educ. 2017;51:787–801
Balmer DF, Darden A, Chandran L, D’Alessandro D, Gusic ME. How mentor identity evolves: Findings from a 10-year follow-up study of a national professional development program. Acad Med. 2018;93:1085–1090
Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:284–299
Lucey CR, Thibault GE, Ten Cate O. Competency-based, time-variable education in the health professions: Crossroads. Acad Med. 2018;933 supplS1–S5
Kennedy TJ, Lingard L, Baker GR, Kitchen L, Regehr G. Clinical oversight: Conceptualizing the relationship between supervision and safety. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1080–1085
Yardley S, Westerman M, Bartlett M, Walton JM, Smith J, Peile E. The do’s, don’t and don’t knows of supporting transition to more independent practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:8–22
Goldman J, Kuper A, Wong BM. How theory can inform our understanding of experiential learning in quality improvement education. Acad Med. 2018;93:1784–1790
Morris C, Blaney D. Swanwick T, ed. Work-based learning. In: Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice. 2014.2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: The Association for the Study of Medical Education;
McGaghie WC, Harris IB. Learning theory foundations of simulation-based mastery learning. Simul Healthc. 2018;133 suppl 1S15–S20
Cleland J, Walker KG, Gale M, Nicol LG. Simulation-based education: Understanding the socio-cultural complexity of a surgical training ‘boot camp’. Med Educ. 2016;50:829–841
Bergh AM, Bac M, Hugo J, Sandars J. “Making a difference”—Medical students’ opportunities for transformational change in health care and learning through quality improvement projects. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:171
Lave J, Wenger ESituated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. 1991.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press;
Wenger ECommunities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. 1998.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press;
Nelson EC, Godfrey MM, Batalden PB, et al. Clinical microsystems, part 1. The building blocks of health systems. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:367–378
Headrick LA, Ogrinc G, Hoffman KG, et al. Exemplary care and learning sites: A model for achieving continual improvement in care and learning in the clinical setting. Acad Med. 2016;91:354–359
Weiss KB, Co JPT, Bagian JP; CLER Evaluation Committee. Challenges and Opportunities in the 6 focus areas: CLER National Report of Findings 2018. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10suppl 425–48