In Silico, Ex Vivo and In Vivo Studies of Roflumilast as a Potential Antidiarrheal and Antispasmodic agent: Inhibition of the PDE-4 Enzyme and Voltage-gated Ca++ ion Channels.
Aminopyridines
/ chemistry
Animals
Antidiarrheals
/ chemistry
Benzamides
/ chemistry
Binding Sites
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ chemistry
Carbachol
/ pharmacology
Castor Oil
/ administration & dosage
Cyclic AMP
/ metabolism
Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4
/ chemistry
Cyclopropanes
/ chemistry
Diarrhea
/ chemically induced
Isoproterenol
/ pharmacology
Jejunum
/ drug effects
Mice
Molecular Docking Simulation
Papaverine
/ pharmacology
Parasympatholytics
/ chemistry
Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors
/ chemistry
Protein Binding
Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs
Protein Structure, Secondary
Rabbits
Verapamil
/ pharmacology
Ca++ channel blocker
PDE inhibitor
antispasmodic
autoDock vina
molecular docking
roflumilast
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Feb 2020
24 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
14
01
2020
revised:
21
02
2020
accepted:
24
02
2020
entrez:
28
2
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible gut inhibitory role of the phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor roflumilast. Increasing doses of roflumilast were tested against castor oil-induced diarrhea in mice, whereas the pharmacodynamics of the same effect was determined in isolated rabbit jejunum tissues. For in silico analysis, the identified PDE protein was docked with roflumilast and papaverine using the Autodock vina program from the PyRx virtual screening tool. Roflumilast protected against diarrhea significantly at 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg doses, with 40% and 80% protection. Ex vivo findings from jejunum tissues show that roflumilast possesses an antispasmodic effect by inhibiting spontaneous contractions in a concentration-dependent manner. Roflumilast reversed carbachol (CCh, 1 µM)-mediated and potassium (K+, 80 mM)-mediated contractile responses with comparable efficacies but different potencies. The observed potency against K+ was significantly higher in comparison to CCh, similar to verapamil. Experiments were extended to further confirm the inhibitory effect on Ca++ channels. Interestingly, roflumilast deflected Ca++ concentration-response curves (CRCs) to the right with suppression of the maximum peak at both tested doses (0.001-0.003 mg/mL), similar to verapamil. The PDE-inhibitory effect was authenticated when pre-incubation of jejunum tissues with roflumilast (0.03-0.1 mg/mL) produced a leftward deflection of isoprenaline-mediated inhibitory CRCs and increased the tissue level of cAMP, similar to papaverine. This idea was further strengthened by molecular docking studies, where roflumilast exhibited a better binding affinity (-9.4 kcal/mol) with the PDE protein than the standard papaverine (-8.3 kcal/mol). In conclusion, inhibition of Ca++ channels and the PDE-4 enzyme explains the pharmacodynamics of the gut inhibitory effect of roflumilast.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32102361
pii: molecules25041008
doi: 10.3390/molecules25041008
pmc: PMC7070291
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Antidiarrheals
0
Benzamides
0
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Parasympatholytics
0
Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors
0
Roflumilast
0P6C6ZOP5U
Castor Oil
8001-79-4
Carbachol
8Y164V895Y
Verapamil
CJ0O37KU29
Papaverine
DAA13NKG2Q
Cyclic AMP
E0399OZS9N
Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4
EC 3.1.4.17
Isoproterenol
L628TT009W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
ID : 2019/03/10464
Références
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2016 Nov;26(9):700-708
pubmed: 27785949
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1263:243-50
pubmed: 25618350
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:304960
pubmed: 21423691
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000 Feb;14(1):65-9
pubmed: 10717503
Indian J Pediatr. 2011 Feb;78(2):165-70
pubmed: 20924718
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2019 May;38(5):588-597
pubmed: 30744402
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Dec;20(11-12):1253-69
pubmed: 15606387
Life Sci. 1997;60(8):535-44
pubmed: 9042388
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;19(6):695-705
pubmed: 16313282
J Phys Chem B. 2017 Jul 20;121(28):6813-6821
pubmed: 28657759
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1977;17:149-66
pubmed: 326161
Br J Pharmacol. 1997 Jun;121(3):375-80
pubmed: 9179376
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):145-9
pubmed: 19169820
Med Res Rev. 2005 Mar;25(2):229-44
pubmed: 15514991
Eur J Pharmacol. 1978 Dec 1;52(3-4):313-22
pubmed: 729641
Br J Pharmacol. 1986 May;88(1):103-11
pubmed: 3708211
J Vet Med Sci. 2005 Jul;67(7):659-65
pubmed: 16082113
Phytother Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):1211-8
pubmed: 25975350
Res Vet Sci. 2007 Apr;82(2):181-6
pubmed: 17014875
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jan;132(1):76-86
pubmed: 17241861
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2007 Mar;6(1):17-26
pubmed: 17352685
Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;147 Suppl 1:S252-7
pubmed: 16402111
Phytother Res. 2013 Jul;27(7):1086-94
pubmed: 23007892
Pharmacol Rev. 1986 Dec;38(4):321-416
pubmed: 2432624
J Clin Invest. 2001 Jan;107(1):3-6
pubmed: 11134170
Future Microbiol. 2013 Oct;8(10):1289-300
pubmed: 24059919
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1977 Jun;201(3):662-8
pubmed: 864602
Clin Exp Immunol. 1995 Sep;101(3):387-9
pubmed: 7664483
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Jan;60(1):57-63
pubmed: 16409429
Saudi Pharm J. 2019 Jul;27(5):673-681
pubmed: 31297022
J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Nov 21;144(2):395-401
pubmed: 23026304
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jul 18;133(2):136-47
pubmed: 10896640
Gen Pharmacol. 1992 May;23(3):347-53
pubmed: 1511846
J Ethnopharmacol. 2006 May 24;105(3):409-14
pubmed: 16387459
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1203-6
pubmed: 15004076
Phytother Res. 2014 Sep;28(9):1349-58
pubmed: 24610729
J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jun 20;168:182-90
pubmed: 25861952