Development of disease-modifying drugs for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
/ drug therapy
Antibodies
/ therapeutic use
Aphasia, Primary Progressive
/ drug therapy
C9orf72 Protein
/ genetics
DNA-Binding Proteins
/ metabolism
Drug Development
Frontotemporal Dementia
/ drug therapy
Humans
Immunization, Passive
Immunotherapy, Active
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Progranulins
/ genetics
RNA-Binding Protein EWS
/ metabolism
RNA-Binding Protein FUS
/ metabolism
Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
/ drug therapy
TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors
/ metabolism
Tubulin Modulators
/ therapeutic use
tau Proteins
/ genetics
Journal
Nature reviews. Neurology
ISSN: 1759-4766
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101500072
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
accepted:
14
02
2020
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
29
4
2020
entrez:
24
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of clinical syndromes characterized by progressive executive, behavioural and language dysfunction. The various FTD spectrum disorders are associated with brain accumulation of different proteins: tau, the transactive response DNA binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP43), or fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein, Ewing sarcoma protein and TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 (TAF15) (collectively known as FET proteins). Approximately 60% of patients with FTD have autosomal dominant mutations in C9orf72, GRN or MAPT genes. Currently available treatments are symptomatic and provide limited benefit. However, the increased understanding of FTD pathogenesis is driving the development of potential disease-modifying therapies. Most of these drugs target pathological tau - this category includes tau phosphorylation inhibitors, tau aggregation inhibitors, active and passive anti-tau immunotherapies, and MAPT-targeted antisense oligonucleotides. Some of these therapeutic approaches are being tested in phase II clinical trials. Pharmacological approaches that target the effects of GRN and C9orf72 mutations are also in development. Key results of large clinical trials will be available in a few years. However, clinical trials in FTD pose several challenges, and the development of specific brain imaging and molecular biomarkers could facilitate the recruitment of clinically homogenous groups to improve the chances of positive clinical trial results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32203398
doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0330-x
pii: 10.1038/s41582-020-0330-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
C9orf72 Protein
0
C9orf72 protein, human
0
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
GRN protein, human
0
MAPT protein, human
0
Progranulins
0
RNA-Binding Protein EWS
0
RNA-Binding Protein FUS
0
TAF15 protein, human
0
TARDBP protein, human
0
TATA-Binding Protein Associated Factors
0
Tubulin Modulators
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
213-228Références
Bang, J., Spina, S. & Miller, B. L. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet 386, 1672–1682 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00461-4
pubmed: 26595641
pmcid: 5970949
Coyle-Gilchrist, I. T. et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Neurology 86, 1736–1743 (2016).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002638
pubmed: 27037234
pmcid: 4854589
Tsai, R. M. & Boxer, A. L. Therapy and clinical trials in frontotemporal dementia: past, present, and future. J. Neurochem. 138, 211–221 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/jnc.13640
pubmed: 27306957
pmcid: 5217534
Young, J. J. et al. Frontotemporal dementia: latest evidence and clinical implications. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 8, 33–48 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2045125317739818
pubmed: 29344342
Panza, F. et al. A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 73–88 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0116-6
pubmed: 30610216
Ihl, R. et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 12, 2–32 (2011).
doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.538083
pubmed: 21288069
Huey, E. D., Putnam, K. T. & Grafman, J. A systematic review of neurotransmitter deficits and treatments in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 66, 17–22 (2006).
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000191304.55196.4d
pubmed: 16401839
pmcid: 4499854
Li, Y. et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, CD009444 (2015).
Buoli, M. et al. Pharmacological management of psychiatric symptoms in frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 30, 162–169 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0891988717700506
pubmed: 28351199
O’Brien, J. T. et al. Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: a revised (third) consensus statement from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J. Psychopharmacol. 31, 147–166 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0269881116680924
pubmed: 28103749
Moretti, R. et al. Rivastigmine in frontotemporal dementia: an open-label study. Drugs Aging 21, 931–937 (2019).
doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421140-00003
Kertesz, A. et al. Galantamine in frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 25, 178–185 (2008).
doi: 10.1159/000113034
pubmed: 18196898
Litvan, I. et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 57, 467–473 (2001).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.3.467
pubmed: 11502915
Kishi, T., Matsunaga, S. & Iwata, N. Memantine for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 11, 2883–2885 (2015).
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S94430
pubmed: 26648724
pmcid: 4648602
Vercelletto, M. et al. Memantine in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: negative results. J. Alzheimer Dis. 23, 749–759 (2011).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101632
Boxer, A. L. et al. Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 12, 149–156 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70320-4
pubmed: 23290598
pmcid: 3756890
Mendez, M. F. et al. Preliminary findings: behavioral worsening on donepezil in patients with frontotemporal dementia. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 15, 84–87 (2007).
doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000231744.69631.33
Fabbrini, G. et al. Donepezil in the treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neurol. Scand. 103, 123–125 (2001).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.103002123.x
pubmed: 11227131
Liepelt, I. et al. Rivastigmine for the treatment of dementia in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy: clinical observations as a basis for power calculations and safety analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 6, 70–74 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.04.1231
pubmed: 20129321
Lozupone, M. et al. Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of depression in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a treatment-resistant depressive disorder. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 19, 823–842 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1471136
pubmed: 29726758
Swartz, J. R. et al. Frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors. J. Clin. Psychiatry 58, 212–216 (1997).
doi: 10.4088/JCP.v58n0506
pubmed: 9184615
Chow, T. W. & Mendez, M. F. Goals in symptomatic pharmacologic management of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 17, 267–272 (2002).
doi: 10.1177/153331750201700504
pubmed: 12392261
pmcid: 5841918
Moretti, R. et al. Frontotemporal dementia: paroxetine as a possible treatment of behavior symptoms. Eur. Neurol. 49, 13–19 (2003).
doi: 10.1159/000067021
pubmed: 12464713
Deakin, J. B. et al. Paroxetine does not improve symptoms and impairs cognition in frontotemporal dementia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Psychopharmacology 172, 400–408 (2004).
doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1686-5
pubmed: 14666399
Herrmann, N. et al. Serotonergic function and treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of frontotemporal dementia. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 20, 789–797 (2012).
doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31823033f3
pubmed: 21878805
Hughes, L. E. et al. Improving response inhibition systems in frontotemporal dementia with citalopram. Brain 138, 1961–1975 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awv133
pubmed: 26001387
pmcid: 5412666
Meyer, S. et al. Citalopram improves obsessive-compulsive crossword puzzling in frontotemporal dementia. Case Rep. Neurol. 11, 94–105 (2019).
doi: 10.1159/000495561
pubmed: 31011326
pmcid: 6465705
Lebert, F. et al. Frontotemporal dementia: a randomised, controlled trial with trazodone. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 17, 355–359 (2004).
doi: 10.1159/000077171
pubmed: 15178953
Mendez, M. F., Shapira, J. S. & Miller, B. L. Stereotypical movements and frontotemporal dementia. Mov. Disord. 20, 742–745 (2005).
doi: 10.1002/mds.20465
pubmed: 15786492
Prodan, C. I., Monnon, M. & Ross, E. D. Behavioral abnormalities associated with rapid deterioration of language functions in semantic dementia respond to sertraline. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 1416–1417 (2009).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.173260
pubmed: 19917830
Anneser, J. M., Jox, R. J. & Borasio, G. D. Inappropriate sexual behavior in a case of ALS and FTD: successful treatment with sertraline. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 8, 189–190 (2007).
doi: 10.1080/17482960601073543
pubmed: 17538783
Ikeda, M. et al. Efficacy of fluvoxamine as a treatment for behavioral symptoms in frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 17, 117–121 (2004).
doi: 10.1159/000076343
pubmed: 14739531
Anderson, I. M., Scott, K. & Harborne, G. Serotonine and depression in frontal lobe dementia. Am. J. Psychiatry 152, 645 (1995).
pubmed: 7694920
Panza, F. et al. Progresses in treating agitation: a major clinical challenge in Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 16, 2581–2588 (2015).
doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1092520
pubmed: 26389682
Pijnenburg, Y. A. et al. Vulnerability to neuroleptic side effects in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 18, 67–72 (2003).
doi: 10.1002/gps.774
Curtis, R. C. & Resch, D. S. Case of Pick´s central lobar atrophy with apparent stabilization of cognitive decline after treatment with risperidone. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20, 384–385 (2000).
doi: 10.1097/00004714-200006000-00018
pubmed: 10831030
Fellgiebel, A. et al. Clinical improvement in a case of frontotemporal dementia under aripiprazole treatment corresponds to partial recovery of disturbed frontal glucose metabolism. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 8, 123–126 (2007).
doi: 10.1080/15622970601016538
pubmed: 17455105
Moretti, R. et al. Olanzapine as a treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a 24-month follow-up of 68 patients. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 18, 205–214 (2003).
doi: 10.1177/153331750301800410
pubmed: 12955785
Jha, M. K. et al. A case of frontotemporal dementia presenting with treatment-refractory psychosis and extreme violence: Response to combination of clozapine, medroxyprogesterone, and sertraline. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 35, 732–733 (2015).
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000414
pubmed: 26479224
Riedl, L. et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 10, 297–310 (2014).
pubmed: 24600223
pmcid: 3928059
Hodges, J. R. et al. Clinicopathotogical correlates in frontotemporal dementia. Ann. Neurol. 56, 399–406 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/ana.20203
pubmed: 15349867
Goldman, L. S. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents, Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 279, 1100–1107 (1998).
doi: 10.1001/jama.279.14.1100
pubmed: 9546570
Huey, E. D. et al. Stimulant treatment of frontotemporal dementia in 8 patients. J. Clin. Psychiatry 69, 1981–1982 (2008).
doi: 10.4088/JCP.v69n1219a
pubmed: 19203481
pmcid: 4489562
Rahman, S. et al. Methylphenidate (‘Ritalin’) can ameliorate abnormal risk-taking behavior in the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 651–658 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300886
pubmed: 16160709
pmcid: 1852060
Reed, D. A. et al. A clinical trial of bromocriptine for treatment of primary progressive aphasia. Ann. Neurol. 56, 750 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/ana.20301
pubmed: 15505780
Adler, G., Teufel, M. & Drach, L. M. Pharmacological treatment of frontotemporal dementia: treatment response to the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 18, 653–655 (2003).
doi: 10.1002/gps.894
pubmed: 12833310
Moretti, R. et al. Effects of selegiline on fronto-temporal dementia: a neuropsychological evaluation. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 17, 391–392 (2002).
doi: 10.1002/gps.602
pubmed: 11994896
Jesso, S. et al. The effects of oxytocin on social cognition and behavior in frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134, 2493–2501 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr171
pubmed: 21859765
Finger, E. C. et al. Oxytocin for frontotemporal dementia: a randomized dose-finding study of safety and tolerability. Neurology 84, 174–181 (2015).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001133
pubmed: 25503617
pmcid: 4336088
Callegari, I. et al. Agomelatine improves apathy in frontotemporal dementia. Neurodegener. Dis. 16, 352–356 (2016).
doi: 10.1159/000445873
pubmed: 27229348
Solfrizzi, V. et al. Nutritional interventions and cognitive-related outcomes in patients with late-life cognitive disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 95, 480–498 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.022
pubmed: 30395922
Pardini, M. et al. Souvenaid reduces behavioral deficits and improves social cognition skills in frontotemporal dementia: a proof-of-concept study. Neurodegener. Dis. 15, 58–62 (2015).
doi: 10.1159/000369811
pubmed: 25592742
Augustin, K. et al. Mechanisms of action for the medium-chain triglyceride ketogenic diet in neurological and metabolic disorders. Lancet Neurol. 17, 84–93 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30408-8
pubmed: 29263011
Nygaard, H. B. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of a ketogenic intervention in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 13, p838 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.276
Rascovsky, K. et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134, 2456–2477 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr179
pubmed: 21810890
pmcid: 3170532
Capozzo, R. et al. Clinical and genetic analyses of familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia patients in Southern Italy. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 858–869 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.011
pubmed: 28264768
pmcid: 6232845
Gorno-Tempini, M. L. et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76, 1006–1014 (2011).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6
pubmed: 21325651
pmcid: 3059138
Höglinger, G. U. et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the movement disorder society criteria. Mov. Disord. 32, 853–864 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/mds.26987
pubmed: 28467028
pmcid: 5516529
Armstrong, M. J. et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 80, 496–503 (2013).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1
pubmed: 23359374
pmcid: 3590050
Strong, M. J. et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener. 18, 153–174 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/21678421.2016.1267768
pubmed: 28054827
Josephs, K. A. Frontotemporal dementia and related disorders: deciphering the enigma. Ann. Neurol. 64, 4–14 (2008).
doi: 10.1002/ana.21426
pubmed: 18668533
Josephs, K. A. et al. Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 122, 137–153 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0839-6
pubmed: 21614463
pmcid: 3232515
Hutton, M. et al. Association of missense and 5’-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 393, 702–705 (1998).
doi: 10.1038/31508
pubmed: 9641683
Neumann, M. et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 314, 130–133 (2006).
doi: 10.1126/science.1134108
pubmed: 17023659
Neumann, M. et al. A new subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with FUS pathology. Brain 132, 2922–2931 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awp214
pubmed: 19674978
pmcid: 2768659
Kwiatkowski, T. J. Jr. et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 323, 1205–1208 (2009).
doi: 10.1126/science.1166066
pubmed: 19251627
Vance, C. et al. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science 323, 1208–1211 (2009).
doi: 10.1126/science.1165942
pubmed: 19251628
pmcid: 4516382
Neumann, M. et al. FET proteins TAF15 and EWS are selective markers that distinguish FTLD with FUS pathology from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with FUS mutations. Brain 134, 2595–2609 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr201
pubmed: 21856723
pmcid: 3170539
Brelstaff, J. et al. Transportin1: a marker of FTLD-FUS. Acta Neuropathol. 122, 591–600 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0863-6
pubmed: 21847626
Elahi, F. M. & Miller, B. L. A clinicopathological approach to the diagnosis of dementia. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 457–476 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.96
pubmed: 28708131
pmcid: 5771416
Rohrer, J. D. et al. Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 134, 2565–2581 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr198
pubmed: 21908872
pmcid: 3170537
Spillantini, M. G. & Goedert, M. Tau pathology and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 12, 609–622 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70090-5
pubmed: 23684085
Perry, D. C. et al. Clinicopathological correlations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain 140, 3329–3345 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awx254
pubmed: 29053860
pmcid: 5841140
Mailliot, C. et al. Phosphorylation of specific sets of tau isoforms explains different neurodegeneration processes. FEBS Lett. 433, 201–204 (1998).
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00910-7
pubmed: 9744794
Sergeant, N., Wattez, A. & Delacourte, A. Neurofibrillary degeneration in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration: tau pathologies with exclusively “exon 10” isoforms. J. Neurochem. 72, 1243–1249 (1999).
doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0721243.x
pubmed: 10037497
Sergeant, N. et al. Different distribution of phosphorylated tau protein isoforms in Alzheimer’s and Pick’s diseases. FEBS Lett. 412, 578–582 (1997).
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00859-4
pubmed: 9276470
Togo, T. et al. Argyrophilic grain disease is a sporadic 4-repeat tauopathy. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 61, 547–556 (2002).
doi: 10.1093/jnen/61.6.547
pubmed: 12071638
Bigio, E. H. et al. Frontal lobe dementia with novel tauopathy: sporadic multiple system tauopathy with dementia. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 60, 328–341 (2001).
doi: 10.1093/jnen/60.4.328
pubmed: 11305868
Goedert, M. & Jakes, R. Mutations causing neurodegenerative tauopathies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1739, 240–250 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.08.007
pubmed: 15615642
Ahmed, Z. et al. Globular glial tauopathies (GGT) presenting with motor neuron disease or frontotemporal dementia: an emerging group of 4-repeat tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 122, 415–428 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0857-4
pubmed: 21773886
Irwin, D. J. et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: defining phenotypic diversity through personalized medicine. Acta Neuropathol. 129, 469–491 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1380-1
pubmed: 25549971
Neumann, M. & Mackenzie, I. R. Review: neuropathology of non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 45, 19–40 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/nan.12526
pubmed: 30357887
Arai, T. et al. TDP-43 is a component of ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 351, 602–611 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.093
pubmed: 17084815
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 122, 111–113 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0845-8
pubmed: 21644037
pmcid: 3285143
Mackenzie, I. R. & Neumann, M. Reappraisal of TDP-43 pathology in FTLD-U subtypes. Acta Neuropathol. 134, 79–96 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-017-1716-8
pubmed: 28466142
Dobson-Stone, C. et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansion in clinical and neuropathologic frontotemporal dementia cohorts. Neurology 79, 995–1001 (2012).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182684634
pubmed: 22875086
pmcid: 3430710
Tang, W. et al. The growth factor progranulin binds to TNF receptors and is therapeutic against inflammatory arthritis in mice. Science 332, 478–484 (2001).
doi: 10.1126/science.1199214
Van Damme, P. et al. Progranulin functions as a neurotrophic factor to regulate neurite outgrowth and enhance neuronal survival. J. Cell Biol. 181, 37–41 (2008).
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200712039
pubmed: 18378771
pmcid: 2287280
Neumann, M. et al. TDP-43 in the ubiquitin pathology of frontotemporal dementia with VCP gene mutations. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 66, 152–157 (2007).
doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e31803020b9
pubmed: 17279000
DeJesus-Hernandez, M. et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9orf72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 72, 245–256 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011
pubmed: 21944778
pmcid: 3202986
Ash, P. E. et al. Unconventional translation of C9ORF72 GGGGCC expansion generates insoluble polypeptides specific to c9FTD/ALS. Neuron 77, 639–646 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.004
pubmed: 23415312
pmcid: 3593233
Gendron, T. F. et al. Antisense transcripts of the expanded C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat form nuclear RNA foci and undergo repeat-associated non-ATG translation in c9FTD/ALS. Acta Neuropathol. 126, 829–844 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1192-8
pubmed: 24129584
pmcid: 3830741
Mori, K. et al. Bidirectional transcripts of the expanded C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat are translated into aggregating dipeptide repeat proteins. Acta Neuropathol. 126, 881–893 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1189-3
pubmed: 24132570
Mori, K. et al. The C9orf72 GGGGCC repeat is translated into aggregating dipeptide-repeat proteins in FTLD/ALS. Science 339, 1335–1338 (2013).
doi: 10.1126/science.1232927
pubmed: 23393093
Zu, T. et al. RAN proteins and RNA foci from antisense transcripts in C9ORF72 ALS and frontotemporal dementia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E4968–E4977 (2013).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315438110
pubmed: 24248382
Davidson, Y. S. et al. Brain distribution of dipeptide repeat proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9ORF72. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2, 70 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-70
pubmed: 24950788
pmcid: 4229740
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. Quantitative analysis and clinico-pathological correlations of different dipeptide repeat protein pathologies in C9ORF72 mutation carriers. Acta Neuropathol. 130, 845–861 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1476-2
pubmed: 26374446
Neumann, M. et al. Transportin 1 accumulates specifically with FET proteins but no other transportin cargos in FTLD-FUS and is absent in FUS inclusions in ALS with FUS mutations. Acta Neuropathol. 124, 705–716 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1020-6
pubmed: 22842875
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. Atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, TDP-43-negative neuronal inclusions. Brain 131, 1282–1293 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awn061
pubmed: 18362096
Cairns, N. J. et al. Clinical and neuropathologic variation in neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease. Neurology 63, 1376–1384 (2004).
doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000139809.16817.DD
pubmed: 15505152
pmcid: 3516854
Munoz, D. G. et al. FUS pathology in basophilic inclusion body disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 617–627 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0598-9
pubmed: 19830439
Kusaka, H., Matsumoto, S. & Imai, T. An adult-onset case of sporadic motor neuron disease with basophilic inclusions. Acta Neuropathol. 80, 660–665 (1990).
doi: 10.1007/BF00307636
pubmed: 1703386
Kawakami, I. et al. Chorea as a clinical feature of the basophilic inclusion body disease subtype of fused-in-sarcoma associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 4, 36 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0304-9
pubmed: 27044537
pmcid: 4820861
Urwin, H. et al. FUS pathology defines the majority of tau- and TDP-43-negative frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 33–41 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0698-6
pubmed: 20490813
pmcid: 2887939
Skibinski, G. et al. Mutations in the endosomal ESCRTIII-complex subunit CHMP2B in frontotemporal dementia. Nat. Genet. 37, 806–808 (2005).
doi: 10.1038/ng1609
pubmed: 16041373
van der Zee, J. et al. CHMP2B C-truncating mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration are associated with an aberrant endosomal phenotype in vitro. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, 313–322 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm309
pubmed: 17956895
Isaacs, A. M. et al. Frontotemporal dementia caused by CHMP2B mutations. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 8, 246–251 (2011).
doi: 10.2174/156720511795563764
pubmed: 21222599
pmcid: 3182073
Knopman, D. S. et al. Dementia lacking distinctive histologic features: a common non- Alzheimer degenerative dementia. Neurology 40, 251–256 (1990).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.40.2.251
pubmed: 2300243
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 1–4 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0612-2
pubmed: 19924424
Goldman, J. S. et al. Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies. Neurology 65, 1817–1819 (2005).
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187068.92184.63
pubmed: 16344531
Rohrer, J. D. et al. The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 73, 1451–1456 (2009).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bf997a
pubmed: 19884572
pmcid: 2779007
Wood, E. M. et al. Development and validation of pedigree classification criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration. JAMA Neurol. 70, 1411–1417 (2013).
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3956
pubmed: 24081456
pmcid: 3906581
Greaves, C. V. & Rohrer, J. D. An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. 266, 2075–2086 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09363-4
pubmed: 31119452
pmcid: 6647117
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. The neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by mutations in the progranulin gene. Brain 129, 3081–3090 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awl271
pubmed: 17071926
Masellis, M. et al. Novel splicing mutation in the progranulin gene causing familial corticobasal syndrome. Brain 129, 3115–3123 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awl276
pubmed: 17030534
Moreno, F. et al. “Frontotemporoparietal” dementia: clinical phenotype associated with the c.709–1G>A PGRN mutation. Neurology 73, 1367–1374 (2009).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bd82a7
pubmed: 19858458
Ghetti, B., Hutton, M. & Wszolek, Z. Neurodegeneration: the molecular pathology of dementia and movement disorders (ed. Dickson, D.) 86–102 (ISN Neuropath Press, 2003).
Pickering-Brown, S. M. et al. Inherited frontotemporal dementia in nine British families associated with intronic mutations in the tau gene. Brain 125, 732–751 (2002).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awf069
pubmed: 11912108
Watts, G. D. et al. Inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia is caused by mutant valosin-containing protein. Nat. Genet. 36, 377–381 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/ng1332
pubmed: 15034582
Benajiba, L. et al. TARDBP mutations in motoneuron disease with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Ann. Neurol. 65, 470–473 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/ana.21612
pubmed: 19350673
Yan, J. et al. Frameshift and novel mutations in FUS in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ALS/dementia. Neurology 75, 807–814 (2010).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f07e0c
pubmed: 20668259
pmcid: 2938970
Synofzik, M. et al. Screening in ALS and FTD patients reveals 3 novel UBQLN2 mutations outside the PXX domain and a pure FTD phenotype. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 2949.e13-7 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.07.002
pubmed: 22892309
Le Ber, I. et al. SQSTM1 mutations in French patients with frontotemporal dementia or frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 70, 1403–1410 (2013).
pubmed: 24042580
pmcid: 4199096
Bannwarth, S. et al. A mitochondrial origin for frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through CHCHD10 involvement. Brain 137, 2329–2345 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awu138
pubmed: 24934289
pmcid: 4107737
Pottier, C. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals important role for TBK1 and OPTN mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration without motor neuron disease. Acta Neuropathol. 130, 77–92 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1436-x
pubmed: 25943890
pmcid: 4470809
Williams, K. L. et al. CCNF mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Nat. Commun. 15, 11253 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms11253
Mackenzie, I. R. et al. TIA1 Mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia promote phase separation and alter stress granule dynamics. Neuron 95, 808–816 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.025
pubmed: 28817800
pmcid: 5576574
Lattante, S., Rouleau, G. A. & Kabashi, E. TARDBP and FUS mutations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: summary and update. Hum. Mutat. 34, 812–826 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/humu.22319
pubmed: 23559573
de Majo, M. et al. ALS-associated missense and nonsense TBK1 mutations can both cause loss of kinase function. Neurobiol. Aging 71, 266.e1–266.e10 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.015
Irwin, D. J. Tauopathies as clinicopathological entities. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 22, S29–S33 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.020
pubmed: 26382841
Oeckl, P., Steinacker, P., Feneberg, E. & Otto, M. Neurochemical biomarkers in the diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. J. Neurochem. 138 (Suppl. 1), 184–192 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/jnc.13669
pubmed: 27186717
Liu, M. N., Lau, C. I. & Lin, C. P. Precision Medicine for frontotemporal dementia. Front. Psychiatry 10, 75 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00075
pubmed: 30846947
pmcid: 6393374
Hedl, T. J. et al. Proteomics approaches for biomarker and drug target discovery in ALS and FTD. Front. Neurosci. 13, 548 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00548
pubmed: 31244593
pmcid: 6579929
Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 535–562 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
pubmed: 29653606
pmcid: 5958625
Boxer, A. L. et al. The advantages of frontotemporal degeneration drug development (part 2 of frontotemporal degeneration: the next therapeutic frontier). Alzheimers Dement. 9, 189–198 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.03.003
pubmed: 23062850
Tang, W. et al. Assessment of CSF Ab42 as an aid to discriminating Alzheimer’s disease from other dementias and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of 50 studies. J. Neurol. Sci. 345, 26–36 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.07.015
pubmed: 25086857
van Harten, A. C. et al. Tau and p-tau as CSF biomarkers in dementia: a meta-analysis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 49, 353–366 (2011).
pubmed: 21342021
Tang, W. et al. Does CSF p-tau181 help to discriminate Alzheimer’s disease from other dementias and mild cognitive impairment? A meta-analysis of the literature. J. Neural. Transm. 121, 1541–1553 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1226-y
pubmed: 24817210
Skillbäck, T. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau and amyloid-β1-42 in patients with dementia. Brain 138, 2716–2731 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awv181
pubmed: 26133663
Baldeiras, I. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid Ab40 is similarly reduced in patients with Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 358, 308–316 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.022
pubmed: 26388316
pmcid: 26388316
Struyfs, H. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid P-Tau
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00138
pubmed: 26136723
pmcid: 26136723
de Jong, D. et al. CSF neurofilament proteins in the differential diagnosis of dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78, 936–938 (2007).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.107326
pubmed: 17314187
pmcid: 2117885
Zerr, I. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light levels in neurodegenerative dementia: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of prion diseases. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 751–763 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.12.008
pubmed: 29391125
Herbert, M. K. CSF neurofilament light chain but not FLT3 ligand discriminates Parkinsonian disorders. Front. Neurol. 6, 91 (2015).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00091
pubmed: 25999911
pmcid: 4419719
Magdalinou, N. K. et al. A panel of nine cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may identify patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86, 1240–1247 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309562
pubmed: 25589779
pmcid: 4564944
Hu, W. T. et al. Reduced CSF p-Tau
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436625.63650.27
Kortvelyessy, P. et al. CSF biomarkers of neurodegeneration in progressive non-fluent aphasia and other forms of frontotemporal dementia: clues for pathomechanisms? Front. Neurol. 9, 504 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00504
pubmed: 30013506
pmcid: 6036143
Meeter, L. H. H. et al. Clinical value of neurofilament and phospho-tau/tau ratio in the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. Neurology 90, e1231–e1239 (2018).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005261
pubmed: 29514947
pmcid: 5890612
Foiani, M. S. et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 89, 804–807 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317260
pubmed: 29440230
pmcid: 6204947
Janssens, J. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Pathological mechanisms underlying TDP-43 driven neurodegeneration in FTLD-ALS spectrum disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, R77–R87 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt349
pubmed: 23900071
pmcid: 3782069
Borroni, B. et al. Csf p-tau
doi: 10.3109/21678421.2014.971812
pubmed: 25352065
Ghidoni, R. et al. Low plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 14, 1235–1239 (2008).
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325058.10218.fc
Finch, N. et al. Plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutation status in frontotemporal dementia patients and asymptomatic family members. Brain 132, 583–591 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awn352
pubmed: 2664450
pmcid: 2664450
Bruun, M. et al. Detecting frontotemporal dementia syndromes using MRI biomarkers. Neuroimage Clin. 22, 101711 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101711
pubmed: 6369219
pmcid: 6369219
D’Alton, S. & Lewis, J. Therapeutic and diagnostic challenges for frontotemporal dementia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6, 204 (2014).
pubmed: 4137452
pmcid: 4137452
De Conti, L., Borroni, B. & Baralle, M. New routes in frontotemporal dementia drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 12, 659–671 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/17460441.2017.1329294
Panza, F. et al. Disease-modifying therapies for tauopathies: agents in the pipeline. Expert Rev. Neurother. 19, 397–408 (2019).
doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1606715
Drechsel, D. N. et al. Modulation of the dynamic instability of tubulin assembly by the microtubule-associated protein tau. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1141–1154 (1992).
doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.10.1141
pubmed: 275678
pmcid: 275678
Goedert, M. et al. Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3, 519–526 (1989).
doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90210-9
Andreadis, A., Brown, W. M. & Kosik, K. S. Structure and novel exons of the human tau gene. Biochemistry 3, 10626–10633 (1992).
doi: 10.1021/bi00158a027
Uversky, V. N. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 2–12 (2002).
doi: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02649.x
Jeganathan, S. et al. The natively unfolded character of tau and its aggregation to Alzheimer-like paired helical filaments. Biochemistry 47, 10526–10539 (2008).
doi: 10.1021/bi800783d
pubmed: 18783251
pmcid: 18783251
Lindwall, G. & Cole, R. D. Phosphorylation affects the ability of tau protein to promote microtubule assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5301–5305 (1984).
pubmed: 6425287
Holmes, B. B. & Diamond, M. I. Prion-like properties of Tau protein: the importance of extracellular Tau as a therapeutic target. J. Biol. Chem. 18, 19855–19861 (2014).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.549295
Rohrer, J. D. & Warren, J. D. Phenotypic signatures of genetic frontotemporal dementia. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 24, 542–549 (2011).
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834cd442
pubmed: 21986680
pmcid: 21986680
Papazacharias, A. et al. Bipolar disorder and frontotemporal dementia: an intriguing association. J. Alzheimers Dis. 55, 973–979 (2017).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-160860
pubmed: 27802240
pmcid: 27802240
Hong, M. et al. Lithium reduces tau phosphorylation by inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25326–25332 (1997).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25326
pubmed: 9312151
pmcid: 9312151
Noble, W. et al. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by lithium correlates with reduced tauopathy and degeneration in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6990–6995 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500466102
Engel, T. et al. Chronic lithium administration to FTDP-17 tau and GSK-3β overexpressing mice prevents tau hyperphosphorylation and neurofibrillary tangle formation, but pre-formed neurofibrillary tangles do not revert. J. Neurochem. 99, 1445–1555 (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04139.x
pubmed: 17059563
pmcid: 17059563
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00703677 (2015).
Höglinger, G. U. et al. Tideglusib reduces progression of brain atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy in a randomized trial. Mov. Disord. 29, 479–487 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/mds.25815
Tolosa, E. et al. A phase 2 trial of the GSK-3 inhibitor tideglusib in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov. Disord. 29, 470–478 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/mds.25824
Wischik, C. M. et al. Selective inhibition of Alzheimer disease-like tau aggregation by phenothiazines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11213–11218 (1996).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.11213
Seripa, D. et al. Tau-directed approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: focus on leuco-methylthioninium. Expert Rev. Neurother. 16, 259–277 (2016).
doi: 10.1586/14737175.2016.1140039
Gauthier, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of tau-aggregation inhibitor therapy in patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase 3 trial. Lancet 388, 2873–2884 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31275-2
pubmed: 27863809
pmcid: 5164296
TauRx Pharmaceuticals, Press Release at the 10th International Conference on Frontotemporal Dementias, Munich, August 31–September 2 https://taurx.com/trx-237-007-phase-3-clinical-trial-update.pdf (2016).
Min, S. W. et al. Critical role of acetylation in tau-mediated neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits. Nat. Med. 21, 1154–1162 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nm.3951
pubmed: 26390242
pmcid: 4598295
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02422485 (2018).
Paholikova, K. et al. N-terminal truncation of microtubule associated protein tau dysregulates its cellular localization. J. Alzheimers Dis. 43, 915–926 (2015).
doi: 10.3233/JAD-140996
pubmed: 25147106
Kontsekova, E. et al. First-in-man tau vaccine targeting structural determinants essential for pathological tau-tau interaction reduces tau oligomerisation and neurofibrillary degeneration in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 6, 44 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/alzrt278
pubmed: 25478017
pmcid: 4255368
Novak, P. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the tau vaccine AADvac1 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet Neurol. 16, 123–134 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30331-3
pubmed: 27955995
Panza, F. & Logroscino, G. Anti-tau vaccine in Alzheimer’s disease: a tentative step. Lancet Neurol. 16, 99–100 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30340-4
pubmed: 27955996
Novak, P. et al. FUNDAMANT: an interventional 72-week phase 1 follow-up study of AADvac1, an active immunotherapy against tau protein pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 10, 108 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0436-1
pubmed: 30355322
pmcid: 6201586
AXON Neuroscience SE. Axon Announces Positive Results From Phase II ADAMANT Trial for AADvac1 in Alzheimer’s Disease. CISION PR Newswire https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/axon-announces-positive-results-from-phase-ii-adamant-trial-for-aadvac1-in-alzheimers-disease-300914509.html (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03174886 (2019).
Dai, C. L. et al. Passive immunization targeting the N-terminal projection domain of tau decreases tau pathology and improves cognition in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease and tauopathies. J. Neural. Transm. 122, 607–617 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1315-y
pubmed: 25233799
Panza, F. et al. Tau-based therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease: active and passive immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 8, 1119–1134 (2016).
doi: 10.2217/imt-2016-0019
pubmed: 27485083
Bright, J. et al. Human secreted tau increases amyloid-β production. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 693–709 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.007
pubmed: 25442111
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02294851 (2017).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02460094 (2018).
Boxer, A. L. et al. Safety of the tau-directed monoclonal antibody BIIB092 in progressive supranuclear palsy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose phase 1b trial. Lancet Neurol. 18, 549–558 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30139-5
pubmed: 31122495
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03068468 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03658135 (2019).
Gosuranemab, Biogen’s Anti-Tau Immunotherapy, Does not fly for PSP. ALZFORUM https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/gosuranemab-biogens-anti-tau-immunotherapy-does-not-fly-psp (2019).
Braak, H. & Del Tredici, K. Alzheimer’s pathogenesis: is there neuron-to-neuron propagation? Acta Neuropathol. 121, 589–595 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0825-z
pubmed: 21516512
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02494024 (2017).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03413319 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02985879 (2020).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03391765 (2019).
Carroll, J. AbbVie scraps an anti-tau study, and that may foretell more big trouble for a beleaguered Biogen. ENDPOINTS NEWS. https://endpts.com/abbvie-scraps-an-anti-tau-study-and-that-may-foretell-more-big-trouble-for-a-beleaguered-biogen/ (2019).
To Block Tau’s Proteopathic Spread, Antibody Must Attack its Mid-Region. ALZFORUM. https://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/block-taus-proteopathic-spread-antibody-must-attack-its-mid-region (2018).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03464227 (2018).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04185415 (2020).
Jarskog, L. F. et al. Effects of davunetide on N-acetylaspartate and choline in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 1245–1252 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.23
pubmed: 23325325
pmcid: 3656368
Javitt, D. C. et al. Effect of the neuroprotective peptide davunetide (AL-108) on cognition and functional capacity in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 136, 25–31 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.11.001
pubmed: 22169248
Vulih-Shultzman, I. et al. Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein snippet NAP reduces tau hyperphosphorylation and enhances learning in a novel transgenic mouse model. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 323, 438–449 (2007).
doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.129551
pubmed: 17720885
Matsuoka, Y. et al. A neuronal microtubule-interacting agent, NAPVSIPQ, reduces tau pathology and enhances cognitive function in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 325, 146–153 (2008).
doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.130526
pubmed: 18199809
Jouroukhin, Y. et al. NAP (davunetide) modifies disease progression in a mouse model of severe neurodegeneration: protection against impairments in axonal transport. Neurobiol. Dis. 56, 79–94 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.04.012
pubmed: 23631872
Morimoto, B. H. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose, randomized study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and effects on cognition of AL-108 after 12 weeks of intranasal administration in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 35, 325–326 (2013).
doi: 10.1159/000348347
pubmed: 23594991
Boxer, A. L. et al. Davunetide in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 13, 676–685 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70088-2
pubmed: 24873720
pmcid: 4129545
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01056965 (2019).
Tsai, R. M. et al. Reactions to multiple ascending doses of the microtubule stabilizer TPI-287 in patients with Alzheimer disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 77, 215–224 (2020).
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3812
Sud, R., Geller, E. T. & Schellenberg, G. D. Antisense-mediated exon skipping decreases tau protein expression: a potential therapy for tauopathies. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e180 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/mtna.2014.30
pubmed: 25072694
pmcid: 4121519
Kalbfuss, B., Mabon, S. A. & Misteli, T. Correction of alternative splicing of tau in frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42986–42993 (2001).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105113200
pubmed: 11560926
DeVos, S. L. et al. Tau reduction prevents neuronal loss and reverses pathological tau deposition and seeding in mice with tauopathy. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaag0481 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag0481
pubmed: 28123067
pmcid: 5792300
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03186989 (2020).
Wang, Y. & Mandelkow, E. Degradation of tau protein by autophagy and proteasomal pathways. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 644–652 (2012).
doi: 10.1042/BST20120071
pubmed: 22817709
Khanna, M. R. et al. Therapeutic strategies for the treatment of tauopathies: hopes and challenges. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 1051–1065 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.006
pubmed: 27751442
pmcid: 5116305
Luo, W. et al. Roles of heat-shock protein 90 in maintaining and facilitating the neurodegenerative phenotype in tauopathies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9511–9516 (2007).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701055104
pubmed: 17517623
Karagoz, G. E. et al. Hsp90-Tau complex reveals molecular basis for specificity in chaperone action. Cell 156, 963–974 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.037
pubmed: 24581495
pmcid: 4263503
Soga, S., Akinaga, S. & Shiotsu, Y. Hsp90 inhibitors as anti-cancer agents, from basic discoveries to clinical development. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 366–376 (2013).
doi: 10.2174/138161213804143617
pubmed: 22920907
Dickey, C. A. et al. HSP induction mediates selective clearance of tau phosphorylated at proline-directed Ser/Thr sites but not KXGS (MARK) sites. FASEB J. 20, 753–755 (2006).
doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5343fje
pubmed: 16464956
Kamal, A., Boehm, M. F. & Burrows, F. J. Therapeutic and diagnostic implications of Hsp90 activation. Trends Mol. Med. 10, 283–290 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.04.006
pubmed: 15177193
Bence, N. F., Sampat, R. M. & Kopito, R. R. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science 292, 1552–1555 (2001).
doi: 10.1126/science.292.5521.1552
pubmed: 11375494
Ozcelik, S. et al. Rapamycin attenuates the progression of tau pathology in P301S tau transgenic mice. PLoS One 8, e62459 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062459
pubmed: 23667480
pmcid: 3646815
Siman, R., Cocca, R. & Dong, Y. The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin mitigates perforant pathway neurodegeneration and synapse loss in a mouse model of early-stage Alzheimer-type tauopathy. PLoS One 10, e0142340 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142340
pubmed: 26540269
pmcid: 4634963
Orr, M. E., Sullivan, A. C. & Frost, B. A brief overview of tauopathy: causes, consequences, and therapeutic strategies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 38, 637–648 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.03.011
pubmed: 28455089
pmcid: 5476494
Liu, F. et al. O-GlcNAcylation regulates phosphorylation of tau: A mechanism involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10804–10809 (2004).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400348101
pubmed: 15249677
Liu, F. et al. Reduced O-GlcNAcylation links lower brain glucose metabolism and tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 132, 1820–1832 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awp099
pubmed: 19451179
pmcid: 2702834
Borghgraef, P. et al. Increasing brain protein O-GlcNAc-ylation mitigates breathing defects and mortality of Tau.P301L mice. PLoS One 8, e84442 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084442
pubmed: 24376810
pmcid: 3871570
Hastings, N. B. et al. Inhibition of O-GlcNAcase leads to elevation of OGlcNAc tau and reduction of tauopathy and cerebrospinal fluid tau in rTg4510 mice. Mol. Neurodegener. 12, 39 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0181-0
pubmed: 28521765
pmcid: 5437664
Pooler, A. M. et al. Propagation of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: identification of novel therapeutic targets. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 5, 1–8 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/alzrt214
Borroni, B. et al. Anti-AMPA GluA3 antibodies in frontotemporal dementia: a new molecular target. Sci. Rep. 7, 6723 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06117-y
pubmed: 28751743
pmcid: 5532270
Alberici, A. et al. Autoimmunity and frontotemporal dementia. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 15, 602–609 (2018).
doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180119104825
pubmed: 29357796
Benussi, A. et al. Toward a glutamate hypothesis of frontotemporal dementia. Front. Neurosci. 13, 304 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00304
pubmed: 30983965
pmcid: 6449454
Zheng, Y. et al. C-terminus of progranulin interacts with the beta-propeller region of sortilin to regulate progranulin trafficking. PLoS One 6, e21023 (2011).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021023
pubmed: 21698296
pmcid: 3115958
Nonaka, T. et al. Prion-like properties of pathological TDP-43 aggregates from diseased brains. Cell Rep. 4, 124–134 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.007
pubmed: 23831027
Kraemer, B. C. et al. Loss of murine TDP-43 disrupts motor function and plays an essential role in embryogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 409–419 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0659-0
pubmed: 20198480
pmcid: 2880609
Yamashita, M. et al. Methylene blue and dimebon inhibit aggregation of TDP-43 in cellular models. FEBS Lett. 583, 2419–2424 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.06.042
pubmed: 19560462
Boyd, J. D. et al. A high-content screen identifies novel compounds that inhibit stress-induced TDP-43 cellular aggregation and associated cytotoxicity. J. Biomol. Screen. 19, 44–56 (2014).
doi: 10.1177/1087057113501553
pubmed: 24019256
Capell, A. et al. Rescue of progranulin deficiency associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration by alkalizing reagents and inhibition of vacuolar ATPase. J. Neurosci. 31, 1885–1894 (2011).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5757-10.2011
pubmed: 21289198
pmcid: 6623716
Alberici, A. et al. Results from a pilot study on amiodarone administration in monogenic frontotemporal dementia with granulin mutation. Neurol. Sci. 35, 1215–1219 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1683-y
pubmed: 24569924
Cenik, B. et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat) up-regulates progranulin transcription: rational therapeutic approach to frontotemporal dementia. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 16101–16108 (2011).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.193433
pubmed: 21454553
pmcid: 3091219
Patzke, H. et al. Development of the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor EVP-0334 for CNS indications [Poster 831.21/I12]. 38th Annual Meeting for the Society of Neuroscience https://www.abstractsonline.com/plan/ViewAbstract.aspx?mID=1981&sKey=7608b1d6-24c8-4a0d-85e8-68357f77ef82&cKey=b58f0420-5bde-407b-afe3-948d274e708b&mKey=afea068d-d012-4520-8e42-10e4d1af7944 (2008).
Leventhal, L. et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor EVP-0334 is pro-cognitive in mice [Poster 831.20/I11]. 38th Annual Meeting for the Society of Neuroscience https://www.abstractsonline.com/plan/ViewAbstract.aspx?mID=1981&sKey=7608b1d6-24c8-4a0d-85e8-68357f77ef82&cKey=4256d6f9-3c58-4903-83ed-8d46d22972dd&mKey=afea068d-d012-4520-8e42-10e4d1af7944 (2008).
Patzke, H. et al. The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor EVP-0334 is pro-cognitive in rats [Poster 886.4/FF106]. 39th Annual Meeting for the Society of Neuroscience https://www.abstractsonline.com/Plan/ViewAbstract.aspx?sKey=74e6ee34-69bf-41db-a73b-fdf5d47df43e&cKey=cfc48c84-c049-4c83-930b-2343b96acb62&mKey=081f7976-e4cd-4f3d-a0af-e8387992a658 (2009).
De Muynck, L. & Van Damme, P. In Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research – Alzheimer Disorders (ed. Atta-ur-Rahman) 231–291 (Bentham Books, 2015).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02149160 (2016).
Sha, S. J. et al. An 8-week, open-label, dose-finding study of nimodipine for the treatment of progranulin insufficiency from GRN gene mutations. Alzheimers Dement. 3, 507–512 (2017).
Galimberti, D., Fenoglio, C. & Scarpini, E. Progranulin as a therapeutic target for dementia. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 22, 579–585 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/14728222.2018.1487951
pubmed: 29889573
Hu, F. et al. Sortilin-mediated endocytosis determines levels of the frontotemporal dementia protein, progranulin. Neuron 68, 654–667 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.034
pubmed: 21092856
pmcid: 2990962
Lee, W. C. et al. Targeted manipulation of the sortilin-progranulin axis rescues progranulin haploinsufficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 1467–1478 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt534
pubmed: 24163244
Alector Announces Data from On-going Phase 1b Trial Demonstrating that AL001 Reverses Progranulin Deficiency in Frontotemporal Dementia Patients. BioSpace https://www.biospace.com/article/-alector-announces-data-from-on-going-phase-1b-trial-demonstrating-that-al001-reverses-progranulin-deficiency-in-frontotemporal-dementia-patients/ (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03987295 (2019).
Bright, F. et al. Neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 540–555 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0231-z
pubmed: 31324897
Tang, W. et al. The growth factor progranulin binds to TNF receptors and is therapeutic against inflammatory arthritis in mice. Science 332, 478–484 (2011).
doi: 10.1126/science.1199214
pubmed: 21393509
pmcid: 3104397
Holler, C. J. et al. Trehalose upregulates progranulin expression in human and mouse models of GRN haploinsufficiency: a novel therapeutic lead to treat frontotemporal dementia. Mol. Neurodegener. 11, 46 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s13024-016-0114-3
pubmed: 27341800
pmcid: 4919863
Minami, S. S. et al. Reducing inflammation and rescuing FTD-related behavioral deficits in progranulin-deficient mice with α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists. Biochem. Pharmacol. 97, 454–462 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.016
pubmed: 26206194
pmcid: 4859338
Prevail Therapeutics Announces FDA Orphan Drug Designation Granted to PR006 for the Treatment of Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia with a GRN Mutation. BioSpace https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/prevail-therapeutics-announces-fda-orphan-drug-designation-granted-to-pr006-for-the-treatment-of-patients-with-frontotemporal-dementia-with-a-grn-mutation/ (2019).
Van Der Zee, J. et al. A pan-European study of the C9orf72 repeat associated with FTLD: geographic prevalence, genomic instability, and intermediate repeats. Hum. Mutat. 34, 363–373 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/humu.22244
pubmed: 23111906
Kramer, N. J. et al. Spt4 selectively regulates the expression of C9orf72 sense and antisense mutant transcripts. Science 353, 708–712 (2016).
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7791
pubmed: 27516603
pmcid: 27516603
Donnelly, C. J. et al. RNA toxicity from the ALS/FTD C9ORF72 expansion is mitigated by antisense intervention. Neuron 80, 415–428 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.015
pubmed: 24139042
pmcid: 4098943
Sareen, D. et al. Targeting RNA foci in iPSC derived motor neurons from ALS patients with a C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Sci. Transl Med. 5, 208ra149 (2013).
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007529
pubmed: 24154603
pmcid: 4090945
Lagier-Tourenne, C. et al. Targeted degradation of sense and antisense C9orf72 RNA foci as therapy for ALS and frontotemporal degeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 19, E4530–E4539 (2013).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318835110
Hu, J. et al. Engineering duplex RNAs for challenging targets: recognition of GGGGCC/CCCCGG repeats at the ALS/FTD C9orf72 locus. Chem. Biol. 22, 1505–1511 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.09.016
pubmed: 26584779
pmcid: 4659491
Martier, R. et al. Targeting RNA-mediated toxicity in C9orf72 ALS and/or FTD by RNAi-based gene therapy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 16, 26–37 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.02.001
pubmed: 30825670
pmcid: 6393708
Kapeli, K. et al. Distinct and shared functions of ALS-associated proteins TDP-43, FUS and TAF15 revealed by multisystem analyses. Nat. Commun. 7, 12143 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12143
pubmed: 27378374
pmcid: 4935974
Fujii, S. et al. Treatment with a global methyltransferase inhibitor induces the intranuclear aggregation of ALS-linked FUS mutant in vitro. Neurochem. Res. 41, 826–835 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11064-015-1758-z
pubmed: 26603295
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02372773 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02365922 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02590276 (2016).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02327845 (2019).
Desmarais, P. et al. Therapeutic trial design for frontotemporal dementia and related disorders. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 90, 412–442 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318603
pubmed: 30361298
Semler, E. et al. A language-based sum score for the course and therapeutic intervention in primary progressive aphasia. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 10, 41 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0345-3
pubmed: 5922300
pmcid: 5922300
Staffaroni, A. M. et al. Longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical endpoints for frontotemporal dementia clinical trials. Brain 142, 443–459 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awy319
pubmed: 6351779
pmcid: 6351779
Ljubenkov, P. A. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers predict frontotemporal dementia trajectory. Ann. Clin. Transl Neurol. 5, 1250–1263 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/acn3.643
pubmed: 6186942
pmcid: 6186942
Modrego, P. & Lobo, A. A good marker does not mean a good target for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid hypothesis questioned. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 9, 119–121 (2019).
doi: 10.2217/nmt-2019-0006