Longitudinal Study of the Variation in Patient Turnover and Patient-to-Nurse Ratio: Descriptive Analysis of a Swiss University Hospital.
electronic health records
nurse staffing
patient safety
routine data
workload
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 04 2020
02 04 2020
Historique:
received:
22
07
2019
accepted:
03
02
2020
revised:
28
10
2019
entrez:
3
4
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Variations in patient demand increase the challenge of balancing high-quality nursing skill mixes against budgetary constraints. Developing staffing guidelines that allow high-quality care at minimal cost requires first exploring the dynamic changes in nursing workload over the course of a day. Accordingly, this longitudinal study analyzed nursing care supply and demand in 30-minute increments over a period of 3 years. We assessed 5 care factors: patient count (care demand), nurse count (care supply), the patient-to-nurse ratio for each nurse group, extreme supply-demand mismatches, and patient turnover (ie, number of admissions, discharges, and transfers). Our retrospective analysis of data from the Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Switzerland included all inpatients and nurses working in their units from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. Two data sources were used. The nurse staffing system (tacs) provided information about nurses and all the care they provided to patients, their working time, and admission, discharge, and transfer dates and times. The medical discharge data included patient demographics, further admission and discharge details, and diagnoses. Based on several identifiers, these two data sources were linked. Our final dataset included more than 58 million data points for 128,484 patients and 4633 nurses across 70 units. Compared with patient turnover, fluctuations in the number of nurses were less pronounced. The differences mainly coincided with shifts (night, morning, evening). While the percentage of shifts with extreme staffing fluctuations ranged from fewer than 3% (mornings) to 30% (evenings and nights), the percentage within "normal" ranges ranged from fewer than 50% to more than 80%. Patient turnover occurred throughout the measurement period but was lowest at night. Based on measurements of patient-to-nurse ratio and patient turnover at 30-minute intervals, our findings indicate that the patient count, which varies considerably throughout the day, is the key driver of changes in the patient-to-nurse ratio. This demand-side variability challenges the supply-side mandate to provide safe and reliable care. Detecting and describing patterns in variability such as these are key to appropriate staffing planning. This descriptive analysis was a first step towards identifying time-related variables to be considered for a predictive nurse staffing model.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Variations in patient demand increase the challenge of balancing high-quality nursing skill mixes against budgetary constraints. Developing staffing guidelines that allow high-quality care at minimal cost requires first exploring the dynamic changes in nursing workload over the course of a day.
OBJECTIVE
Accordingly, this longitudinal study analyzed nursing care supply and demand in 30-minute increments over a period of 3 years. We assessed 5 care factors: patient count (care demand), nurse count (care supply), the patient-to-nurse ratio for each nurse group, extreme supply-demand mismatches, and patient turnover (ie, number of admissions, discharges, and transfers).
METHODS
Our retrospective analysis of data from the Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Switzerland included all inpatients and nurses working in their units from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. Two data sources were used. The nurse staffing system (tacs) provided information about nurses and all the care they provided to patients, their working time, and admission, discharge, and transfer dates and times. The medical discharge data included patient demographics, further admission and discharge details, and diagnoses. Based on several identifiers, these two data sources were linked.
RESULTS
Our final dataset included more than 58 million data points for 128,484 patients and 4633 nurses across 70 units. Compared with patient turnover, fluctuations in the number of nurses were less pronounced. The differences mainly coincided with shifts (night, morning, evening). While the percentage of shifts with extreme staffing fluctuations ranged from fewer than 3% (mornings) to 30% (evenings and nights), the percentage within "normal" ranges ranged from fewer than 50% to more than 80%. Patient turnover occurred throughout the measurement period but was lowest at night.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on measurements of patient-to-nurse ratio and patient turnover at 30-minute intervals, our findings indicate that the patient count, which varies considerably throughout the day, is the key driver of changes in the patient-to-nurse ratio. This demand-side variability challenges the supply-side mandate to provide safe and reliable care. Detecting and describing patterns in variability such as these are key to appropriate staffing planning. This descriptive analysis was a first step towards identifying time-related variables to be considered for a predictive nurse staffing model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32238331
pii: v22i4e15554
doi: 10.2196/15554
pmc: PMC7163415
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15554Informations de copyright
©Sarah N N. Musy, Olga Endrich, Alexander B Leichtle, Peter Griffiths, Christos T Nakas, Michael Simon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.04.2020.
Références
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Apr;49(4):427-36
pubmed: 22030021
J Safety Res. 2007;38(4):431-46
pubmed: 17884430
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):143-53
pubmed: 23254247
Aust Crit Care. 2012 Feb;25(1):13-22
pubmed: 21937236
J Nurs Manag. 2016 May;24(4):449-57
pubmed: 26749124
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan;17(1):6-22
pubmed: 28718658
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Jun;73(6):1491-1501
pubmed: 27878843
Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;28(4):229-34
pubmed: 20571375
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4822-4829
pubmed: 28382638
BMC Nurs. 2011 Apr 18;10:6
pubmed: 21501487
Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1587-94
pubmed: 25867907
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jun;82:99-105
pubmed: 29626703
Nurs Res. 2006 Jul-Aug;55(4):231-42
pubmed: 16849975
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9):938-45
pubmed: 18725848
Br J Nurs. 2006 Jun 22-Jul 12;15(12):656-60
pubmed: 16835541
Appl Nurs Res. 2011 Nov;24(4):244-55
pubmed: 20974086
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1037-45
pubmed: 21410372
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:213-225
pubmed: 27130150
JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93
pubmed: 12387650
J Hosp Med. 2011 Feb;6(2):81-7
pubmed: 21290580
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:192-206
pubmed: 27742350
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10):864-9
pubmed: 25215646
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Sep;23(17-18):2599-608
pubmed: 24354422
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(4):315-21
pubmed: 9866290
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):609-617
pubmed: 30514780
J Nurs Adm. 2010 Sep;40(9):366-73
pubmed: 20798619
Clin Nurse Spec. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):31-42
pubmed: 17213738
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):46
pubmed: 28466462
J Nurs Manag. 2012 Apr;20(3):302-10
pubmed: 22519607
J Nurs Adm. 2013 Sep;43(9):461-7
pubmed: 23979036
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Aug;55(4):435-48
pubmed: 16866839
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Feb;44(2):175-82
pubmed: 17064706
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Jul 15;75(14):1039-1047
pubmed: 29789318
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Dec;36(6):554-66
pubmed: 24242196
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:A1-A2
pubmed: 27599693
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):206-220
pubmed: 31014168
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Jul;73(7):1735-1746
pubmed: 28251690
Nurs Econ. 2005 Mar-Apr;23(2):85-90, 55
pubmed: 15881494
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017 Jul/Sep;40(3):298-310
pubmed: 28266962
Nurs Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;60(4):214-20
pubmed: 21691239
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017 Jun;48(2):207-216
pubmed: 31047370
Clin Nurse Spec. 2005 Sep-Oct;19(5):241-51; quiz 252-4
pubmed: 16179855
J Nurs Adm. 2011 Feb;41(2):64-70
pubmed: 21266884
J Adv Nurs. 2012 May;68(5):1073-81
pubmed: 21883408
BMC Nurs. 2016 Oct 14;15:60
pubmed: 27757068
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001 Mar;103(3):196-202
pubmed: 11240576
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 1;159(7):447-55
pubmed: 24081285
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 May;81:98-106
pubmed: 29554590
Nurs Outlook. 2016 May-Jun;64(3):244-54
pubmed: 26944266
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 30;346(22):1715-22
pubmed: 12037152
Nurs Econ. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):185-91
pubmed: 19558079
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):448-55
pubmed: 17446831
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Mar;22(2):205-16
pubmed: 24878573
Nurs Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;47(1):43-50
pubmed: 9478183
Nurs Outlook. 1998 Sep-Oct;46(5):199-200
pubmed: 9805336
J Nurs Adm. 2017 Oct;47(10):471
pubmed: 28957863
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Aug;20(4):227-37
pubmed: 18436556
Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 1;122(9):681-8
pubmed: 7702231
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2010;28:295-316
pubmed: 21639031
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2482-91
pubmed: 15964672