The MAPK substrate MASS proteins regulate stomatal development in Arabidopsis.
Journal
PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
26
08
2019
accepted:
04
03
2020
revised:
14
04
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
entrez:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stomata are specialized pores in the epidermis of the aerial parts of a plant, where stomatal guard cells close and open to regulate gas exchange with the atmosphere and restrict excessive water vapor from the plant. The production and patterning of the stomatal lineage cells in higher plants are influenced by the activities of the widely-used mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling components. The phenotype caused by the loss-of-function mutations suggested pivotal roles of the canonical MAPK pathway in the suppression of stomatal formation and regulation of stomatal patterning in Arabidopsis, whilst the cell type-specific manipulation of individual MAPK components revealed the existence of a positive impact on stomatal production. Among a large number of putative MAPK substrates in plants, the nuclear transcription factors SPEECHLESS (SPCH) and SCREAM (SCRM) are targets of MAPK 3 and 6 (MPK3/6) in the inhibition of stomatal formation. The polarity protein BREAKING OF ASYMMETRY IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE (BASL) is phosphorylated by MPK3/6 for localization and function in driving divisional asymmetries. Here, by functionally characterizing three MAPK SUBSTRATES IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE (MASS) proteins, we establish that they are plasma membrane-associated, positive regulators of stomatal production. MPK6 can phosphorylate the MASS proteins in vitro and mutating the putative substrate sites interferes the subcellular partition and function of MASS in planta. Our fine-scale domain analyses identify critical subdomains of MASS2 required for specific subcellular localization and biological function, respectively. Furthermore, our data indicate that the MASS proteins may directly interact with the MAPKK Kinase YODA (YDA) at the plasma membrane. Thus, the deeply conserved MASS proteins are tightly connected with MAPK signaling in Arabidopsis to fine-tune stomatal production and patterning, providing a functional divergence of the YDA-MPK3/6 cascade in the regulation of plant developmental processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32240168
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008706
pii: PGENETICS-D-19-01431
pmc: PMC7156110
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
BASL protein, Arabidopsis
0
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
0
Cell Cycle Proteins
0
SPEECHLESS protein, Arabidopsis
0
MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases
EC 2.7.11.25
YODA protein, Arabidopsis
EC 2.7.11.25
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1008706Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM109080
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM131827
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7732):574-578
pubmed: 30429609
Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1697-700
pubmed: 12040198
Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):735-43
pubmed: 10069079
Plant Cell. 2008 Jul;20(7):1775-85
pubmed: 18641265
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:245-66
pubmed: 23663002
J Vis Exp. 2016 Mar 20;(109):
pubmed: 27022690
Plant Cell. 2009 Nov;21(11):3506-17
pubmed: 19897669
Dev Cell. 2015 Apr 20;33(2):136-49
pubmed: 25843888
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Feb;12(2):369-80
pubmed: 23172892
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Oct;6(10):1711-26
pubmed: 17586839
Nature. 2012 Feb 05;482(7385):419-22
pubmed: 22307275
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8732
pubmed: 28821747
Cell. 2009 Jun 26;137(7):1320-30
pubmed: 19523675
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005 Apr;17(2):190-6
pubmed: 15780596
Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1:e0066
pubmed: 22303215
Curr Genomics. 2009 Dec;10(8):550-7
pubmed: 20514217
Arabidopsis Book. 2013 Jun 06;11:e0162
pubmed: 23864836
Anal Biochem. 2017 Nov 1;536:16-31
pubmed: 28802648
J Exp Bot. 2013 Dec;64(17):5243-51
pubmed: 23997204
Science. 2004 Jun 4;304(5676):1494-7
pubmed: 15178800
Science. 2008 Nov 14;322(5904):1113-6
pubmed: 19008449
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Nov 27;9:1674
pubmed: 30538711
Curr Biol. 2007 Jul 3;17(13):1109-15
pubmed: 17600708
Plant Cell. 2014 Aug;26(8):3358-71
pubmed: 25172143
Genes Dev. 2007 Jul 15;21(14):1720-5
pubmed: 17639078
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):641-6
pubmed: 17406292
Plant Physiol. 2012 Sep;160(1):477-87
pubmed: 22786887
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jan;20(1):56-64
pubmed: 25457109
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 7;26(21):2957-2965
pubmed: 27746029
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
pubmed: 24132122
Nat Plants. 2019 Jul;5(7):742-754
pubmed: 31235876
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Aug;21(8):677-685
pubmed: 27143288
Genes Dev. 2012 Jan 15;26(2):126-36
pubmed: 22241782
Plant Cell. 2007 Jan;19(1):63-73
pubmed: 17259259
EMBO J. 2005 Jul 20;24(14):2579-89
pubmed: 15990873
Mol Plant. 2013 Nov;6(6):2008-11
pubmed: 23963532
Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):501-5
pubmed: 17183267
Plant Cell. 2011 Jun;23(6):2440-55
pubmed: 21693696
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Jul 08;12:103
pubmed: 22770370
Science. 2009 Mar 13;323(5920):1485-8
pubmed: 19286558
Dev Cell. 2017 Dec 4;43(5):630-642.e4
pubmed: 29056553
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011 Mar;75(1):50-83
pubmed: 21372320
Science. 2005 Jul 8;309(5732):290-3
pubmed: 16002616
Biochem J. 2012 Sep 1;446(2):271-8
pubmed: 22631074
Curr Biol. 2015 Sep 21;25(18):2361-72
pubmed: 26320950
Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):537-40
pubmed: 17183265
Plant J. 2014 Jan;77(2):222-34
pubmed: 24245741