Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.


Journal

Clinical linguistics & phonetics
ISSN: 1464-5076
Titre abrégé: Clin Linguist Phon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8802622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 01 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 4 4 2020
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 4 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The rhotic sound /r/ is one of the latest-emerging sounds in English, and many children receive treatment for residual errors affecting /r/ that persist past the age of 9. Auditory-perceptual abilities of children with residual speech errors are thought to be different from their typically developing peers. This study examined auditory-perceptual acuity in children with residual speech errors affecting /r/ and the relation of these skills to production accuracy, both before and after a period of treatment incorporating visual biofeedback. Identification of items along an /r/-/w/ continuum was assessed prior to treatment. Production accuracy for /r/ was acoustically measured from standard/r/stimulability probes elicited before and after treatment. Fifty-nine children aged 9-15 with residual speech errors (RSE) affecting /r/ completed treatment, and forty-eight age-matched controls who completed the same auditory-perceptual task served as a comparison group. It was hypothesized that children with RSE would show lower auditory-perceptual acuity than typically developing speakers and that higher auditory-perceptual acuity would be associated with more accurate production before treatment. It was also hypothesized that auditory-perceptual acuity would serve as a mediator of treatment response. Results indicated that typically developing children have more acute perception of the /r/-/w/ contrast than children with RSE. Contrary to hypothesis, baseline auditory-perceptual acuity for /r/ did not predict baseline production severity. For baseline auditory-perceptual acuity in relation to biofeedback efficacy, there was an interaction between auditory-perceptual acuity and gender, such that higher auditory-perceptual acuity was associated with greater treatment response in female, but not male, participants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32242467
doi: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1739749
pmc: PMC7541403
mid: NIHMS1579201
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19-42

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R03 DC013152
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC013668
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F31 DC018197
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC012152
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC017476
Pays : United States

Références

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 11;10:567
pubmed: 27891084
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 Feb;51(1):3-7
pubmed: 3945057
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 May;16(2):128-39
pubmed: 17456891
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):840-852
pubmed: 28715554
Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):217-23
pubmed: 26458197
J Commun Disord. 2016 Oct 14;64:62-77
pubmed: 27973322
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Oct;24(10):795-824
pubmed: 20831378
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003 Nov;12(4):463-71
pubmed: 14658998
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jan;232(1):13-20
pubmed: 24217976
Clin Linguist Phon. 2005 Sep-Nov;19(6-7):605-17
pubmed: 16206487
Lang Speech. 1978 Jul-Sep;21(3):205-220
pubmed: 732397
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):207-21
pubmed: 22442281
J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 Nov;55(4):779-98
pubmed: 2232757
Clin Linguist Phon. 2002 Sep;16(6):403-24
pubmed: 12469448
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jul;26(7):628-45
pubmed: 22690718
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Dec;26(4):516-24
pubmed: 6366368
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jul;108(1):343-56
pubmed: 10923897
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2102-15
pubmed: 25087938
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):EL360
pubmed: 31153348
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 May;15(2):165-76
pubmed: 16782688
J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Oct;37(5):1151-77
pubmed: 7823558
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Feb;139(2):713-27
pubmed: 26936555
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 May;54(2):193-208
pubmed: 2709838
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1175-1193
pubmed: 28389677
Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):257-70
pubmed: 26458201
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):444-455
pubmed: 32097058
J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Apr;37(2):347-57
pubmed: 8028316
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(4):295-315
pubmed: 29792525
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):561-78
pubmed: 22207698
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):461-72
pubmed: 21786912
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Feb;49(1):74-87
pubmed: 16533074
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 8;26(4):1066-1079
pubmed: 29114774
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Sep;54(5):705-728
pubmed: 31179581
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Aug 8;61(8):1875-1892
pubmed: 30073249
Hear Res. 2019 Sep 1;380:166-174
pubmed: 31306931
J Commun Disord. 1995 Dec;28(4):279-302
pubmed: 8576411
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Dec;20(4):694-703
pubmed: 604683
Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Jan 1;39(1):51-8
pubmed: 8719126
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172022
pubmed: 28207800
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):558-570
pubmed: 30506326
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 Feb;50(1):46-53
pubmed: 3974212
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1455-68
pubmed: 10089598
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):635-643
pubmed: 28795872
J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Dec;31(4):556-68
pubmed: 2976438
Eur J Disord Commun. 1992;27(4):289-311
pubmed: 1308694
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3079-87
pubmed: 21110603
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Apr;98:192-200
pubmed: 27720749
J Speech Hear Disord. 1975 Aug;40(3):327-38
pubmed: 1234946
J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Apr;71(4):1008-15
pubmed: 7085977
Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):283-94
pubmed: 26458203
J Commun Disord. 2018 Jan - Feb;71:61-71
pubmed: 29306068
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Aug;16(3):260-70
pubmed: 17666551
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1167-1183
pubmed: 31170355
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):941-50
pubmed: 9712139
J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 May;48(2):210-5
pubmed: 6621013
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug 1;25(3):335-54
pubmed: 26501214

Auteurs

Laine Cialdella (L)

Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.

Heather Kabakoff (H)

Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.

Jonathan Preston (J)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University , Syracuse, NY, USA.
Haskins Laboratories , New Haven, CT, USA.

Sarah Dugan (S)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Caroline Spencer (C)

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Suzanne Boyce (S)

Haskins Laboratories , New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Mark Tiede (M)

Haskins Laboratories , New Haven, CT, USA.

D Whalen (D)

Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York Graduate Center , New York, NY, USA.
Department of Linguistics, Yale University , New Haven, CT, USA.

Tara McAllister (T)

Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University , New York, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH