Tapping into the maize root microbiome to identify bacteria that promote growth under chilling conditions.
Chilling temperatures
Maize
Microbiome
PGPR
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Root endosphere
Journal
Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 04 2020
18 04 2020
Historique:
received:
06
12
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
entrez:
20
4
2020
pubmed:
20
4
2020
medline:
5
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When maize (Zea mays L.) is grown in the Northern hemisphere, its development is heavily arrested by chilling temperatures, especially at the juvenile phase. As some endophytes are beneficial for plants under stress conditions, we analyzed the impact of chilling temperatures on the root microbiome and examined whether microbiome-based analysis might help to identify bacterial strains that could promote growth under these temperatures. We investigated how the maize root microbiome composition changed by means of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing when maize was grown at chilling temperatures in comparison to ambient temperatures by repeatedly cultivating maize in field soil. We identified 12 abundant and enriched bacterial families that colonize maize roots, consisting of bacteria recruited from the soil, whereas seed-derived endophytes were lowly represented. Chilling temperatures modified the root microbiome composition only slightly, but significantly. An enrichment of several chilling-responsive families was detected, of which the Comamonadaceae and the Pseudomonadaceae were the most abundant in the root endosphere of maize grown under chilling conditions, whereas only three were strongly depleted, among which the Streptomycetaceae. Additionally, a collection of bacterial strains isolated from maize roots was established and a selection was screened for growth-promoting effects on juvenile maize grown under chilling temperatures. Two promising strains that promoted maize growth under chilling conditions were identified that belonged to the root endophytic bacterial families, from which the relative abundance remained unchanged by variations in the growth temperature. Our analyses indicate that chilling temperatures affect the bacterial community composition within the maize root endosphere. We further identified two bacterial strains that boost maize growth under chilling conditions. Their identity revealed that analyzing the chilling-responsive families did not help for their identification. As both strains belong to root endosphere enriched families, visualizing and comparing the bacterial diversity in these communities might still help to identify new PGPR strains. Additionally, a strain does not necessarely need to belong to a high abundant family in the root endosphere to provoke a growth-promoting effect in chilling conditions. Video abstract.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
When maize (Zea mays L.) is grown in the Northern hemisphere, its development is heavily arrested by chilling temperatures, especially at the juvenile phase. As some endophytes are beneficial for plants under stress conditions, we analyzed the impact of chilling temperatures on the root microbiome and examined whether microbiome-based analysis might help to identify bacterial strains that could promote growth under these temperatures.
RESULTS
We investigated how the maize root microbiome composition changed by means of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing when maize was grown at chilling temperatures in comparison to ambient temperatures by repeatedly cultivating maize in field soil. We identified 12 abundant and enriched bacterial families that colonize maize roots, consisting of bacteria recruited from the soil, whereas seed-derived endophytes were lowly represented. Chilling temperatures modified the root microbiome composition only slightly, but significantly. An enrichment of several chilling-responsive families was detected, of which the Comamonadaceae and the Pseudomonadaceae were the most abundant in the root endosphere of maize grown under chilling conditions, whereas only three were strongly depleted, among which the Streptomycetaceae. Additionally, a collection of bacterial strains isolated from maize roots was established and a selection was screened for growth-promoting effects on juvenile maize grown under chilling temperatures. Two promising strains that promoted maize growth under chilling conditions were identified that belonged to the root endophytic bacterial families, from which the relative abundance remained unchanged by variations in the growth temperature.
CONCLUSIONS
Our analyses indicate that chilling temperatures affect the bacterial community composition within the maize root endosphere. We further identified two bacterial strains that boost maize growth under chilling conditions. Their identity revealed that analyzing the chilling-responsive families did not help for their identification. As both strains belong to root endosphere enriched families, visualizing and comparing the bacterial diversity in these communities might still help to identify new PGPR strains. Additionally, a strain does not necessarely need to belong to a high abundant family in the root endosphere to provoke a growth-promoting effect in chilling conditions. Video abstract.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32305066
doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00833-w
pii: 10.1186/s40168-020-00833-w
pmc: PMC7166315
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54Références
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018 Jul;41(4):386-398
pubmed: 29567394
Science. 2015 Aug 21;349(6250):860-4
pubmed: 26184915
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012 Feb;25(2):241-9
pubmed: 21942451
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Sep 12;14:233
pubmed: 25227492
Planta. 2000 May;210(6):964-9
pubmed: 10872229
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1873
pubmed: 29018432
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
ISME J. 2018 May;12(5):1167-1170
pubmed: 29335636
Microbiome. 2019 Apr 11;7(1):59
pubmed: 30975184
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 23;9:1473
pubmed: 30405652
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 30;6:32467
pubmed: 27572178
New Phytol. 2016 Jan;209(2):798-811
pubmed: 26467257
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jan 04;8:2191
pubmed: 29354144
ISME J. 2017 Dec;11(12):2691-2704
pubmed: 28753209
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Feb;81(4):1257-66
pubmed: 25501471
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161592
pubmed: 27580055
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jan 09;8:2223
pubmed: 29375600
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2016 May;18(3):471-83
pubmed: 26681628
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 17;9:1205
pubmed: 30174681
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 06;115(6):E1157-E1165
pubmed: 29358405
Front Microbiol. 2014 Jun 04;5:148
pubmed: 24926286
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 29;8:1510
pubmed: 28900441
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019 Jun;49:1-6
pubmed: 31454709
Arch Microbiol. 2011 Jul;193(7):497-513
pubmed: 21442319
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20396
pubmed: 21673982
Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):91-5
pubmed: 22859207
ISME J. 2015 Mar 17;9(4):980-9
pubmed: 25350154
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 20;17:125
pubmed: 26897027
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 08;:
pubmed: 30295674
Science. 2019 Nov 1;366(6465):606-612
pubmed: 31672892
J Appl Microbiol. 1997 Apr;82(4):477-84
pubmed: 9134721
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Jul;141:216-225
pubmed: 28349873
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 29;18(7):
pubmed: 28661431
ISME J. 2009 Mar;3(3):326-39
pubmed: 18971963
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;37:8-14
pubmed: 28433932
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jan 23;9:24
pubmed: 29410675
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 16;7(1):15709
pubmed: 29146930
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):E911-20
pubmed: 25605935
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 02;6:810
pubmed: 26483823
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018 May;111(5):679-690
pubmed: 29335919
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7368-7373
pubmed: 29941552
Microb Biotechnol. 2018 Sep;11(5):801-805
pubmed: 29926519
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012 Oct;62(Pt 10):2505-2510
pubmed: 22155761
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6548-53
pubmed: 23576752
Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):86-90
pubmed: 22859206