CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of TAS4 and MYBA7 loci in grapevine rootstock 101-14.


Journal

Transgenic research
ISSN: 1573-9368
Titre abrégé: Transgenic Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9209120

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 19 06 2019
accepted: 21 02 2020
pubmed: 25 4 2020
medline: 8 6 2021
entrez: 25 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pierce's disease (PD) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is caused by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa and is vectored by xylem sap-sucking insects, whereas Grapevine Red Blotch Virus (GRBV) causes Red Blotch Disease and is transmitted in the laboratory by alfalfa leafhopper Spissistilus festinus. The significance of anthocyanin accumulations in distinct tissues of grapevine by these pathogens is unknown, but vector feeding preferences and olfactory cues from host anthocyanins may be important for these disease etiologies. Phosphate, sugar, and UV light are known to regulate anthocyanin accumulation via miR828 and Trans-Acting Small-interfering locus4 (TAS4), specifically in grape by production of phased TAS4a/b/c small-interfering RNAs that are differentially expressed and target MYBA5/6/7 transcription factor transcripts for post-transcriptional slicing and antisense-mediated silencing. To generate materials that can critically test these genes' functions in PD and GRBV disease symptoms, we produced transgenic grape plants targeting TAS4b and MYBA7 using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. We obtained five MYBA7 lines all with bi-allelic editing events and no off-targets detected at genomic loci with homology to the guide sequence. We obtained two independent edited TAS4b lines; one bi-allelic, the other heterozygous while both had fortuitous evidences of bi-allelic TAS4a off-target editing events at the paralogous locus. No visible anthocyanin accumulation phenotypes were observed in regenerated plants, possibly due to the presence of genetically redundant TAS4c and MYBA5/6 loci or absence of inductive environmental stress conditions. The editing events encompass single base insertions and di/trinucleotide deletions of Vvi-TAS4a/b and Vvi-MYBA7 at expected positions 3 nt upstream from the guideRNA proximal adjacent motifs NGG. We also identified evidences of homologous recombinations of TAS4a with TAS4b at the TAS4a off-target in one of the TAS4b lines, resulting in a chimeric locus with a bi-allelic polymorphism, supporting independent recombination events in transgenic plants associated with apparent high Cas9 activities. The lack of obvious visible pigment phenotypes in edited plants precluded pathogen challenge tests of the role of anthocyanins in host PD and GRBV resistance/tolerance mechanisms. Nonetheless, we demonstrate successful genome-editing of non-coding RNA and MYB transcription factor loci which can serve future characterizations of the functions of TAS4a/b/c and MYBA7 in developmental, physiological, and environmental biotic/abiotic stress response pathways important for value-added nutraceutical synthesis and pathogen responses of winegrape.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32328868
doi: 10.1007/s11248-020-00196-w
pii: 10.1007/s11248-020-00196-w
pmc: PMC7283210
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anthocyanins 0
Plant Proteins 0
Transcription Factors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

355-367

Subventions

Organisme : California Department of Food and Agriculture
ID : 15-0214-SA
Pays : International
Organisme : California Department of Food and Agriculture
ID : 17-0514-SA
Pays : International

Références

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;37:69-75
pubmed: 26707469
Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Sep;80(1):117-29
pubmed: 21533841
Environ Entomol. 2018 Dec 7;47(6):1471-1478
pubmed: 30247531
Plant Dis. 2011 Feb;95(2):173-177
pubmed: 30743407
Plant Dis. 2011 Feb;95(2):166-172
pubmed: 30743408
Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 07;10:550
pubmed: 31134108
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Dec;96:65-76
pubmed: 31039395
BMC Biotechnol. 2015 Mar 12;15:16
pubmed: 25879861
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23
pubmed: 23287718
Phytopathology. 2016 Oct;106(10):1223-1230
pubmed: 27111804
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 20;7:1904
pubmed: 28066464
Curr Microbiol. 2010 Jan;60(1):53-8
pubmed: 19813054
Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 16;10:612
pubmed: 31156675
Phytopathology. 2012 Sep;102(9):816-26
pubmed: 22671027
Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
pubmed: 19261174
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 May;14(5):1291-301
pubmed: 27071672
J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Feb 24;58(4):2403-9
pubmed: 20108901
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1279-89
pubmed: 23321075
J Vis Exp. 2016 Apr 30;(110):
pubmed: 27167304
Sci Rep. 2014 Sep 19;4:6420
pubmed: 25236476
J Econ Entomol. 2012 Apr;105(2):540-8
pubmed: 22606825
Life Sci Alliance. 2019 Jun 13;2(3):
pubmed: 31196871
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Jun;55:77-84
pubmed: 22554830
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Dec 12;4:502
pubmed: 24376452
Phytopathology. 2015 Jul;105(7):1026-32
pubmed: 25738551
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 12;9:2141
pubmed: 30258423
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):1190
pubmed: 30867414
Genome Biol. 2015 Nov 30;16:258
pubmed: 26616834
Science. 2016 May 27;352(6289):1113-6
pubmed: 27230379
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e62945
pubmed: 23667547
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 25;20(1):405
pubmed: 31345161
Plant Dis. 2015 Nov;99(11):1457-1467
pubmed: 30695952
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Sep 25;50(20):5691-6
pubmed: 12236700
Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun;147(2):732-46
pubmed: 18390805
Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):2120-32
pubmed: 19854858
Phytochemistry. 2011 Sep;72(13):1551-65
pubmed: 21354580
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 Oct;17(10):1928-1937
pubmed: 30908830
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 31;6:32289
pubmed: 27576893
New Phytol. 2018 Mar;217(4):1712-1725
pubmed: 29214636
Phytopathology. 2005 Jan;95(1):44-52
pubmed: 18943835
Genes Dev. 2006 Dec 15;20(24):3407-25
pubmed: 17182867
Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):705-6
pubmed: 24972169
Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):816-21
pubmed: 22745249
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Nov;18(11):601-10
pubmed: 23993483
Nat Protoc. 2018 Dec;13(12):2844-2863
pubmed: 30390050
Phytopathology. 2018 Jul;108(7):902-909
pubmed: 29436986
J Comput Biol. 2013 Oct;20(10):714-37
pubmed: 24093227
Plant J. 2018 May;94(3):513-524
pubmed: 29446503
Nat Plants. 2015 Mar 23;1(4):15025
pubmed: 27247031
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3530-5
pubmed: 21245334
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 30;9(1):6729
pubmed: 31040331
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Mar 7;9(3):769-787
pubmed: 30647106
J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503-17
pubmed: 1195397
Mol Plant. 2017 Mar 6;10(3):530-532
pubmed: 28089950
Plant Methods. 2013 Oct 11;9(1):39
pubmed: 24112467
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177966
pubmed: 28542349
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Nov 19;6:1001
pubmed: 26635829
Plant Biotechnol J. 2018 Apr;16(4):844-855
pubmed: 28905515
Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Sep;28(6):1149-54
pubmed: 7548833
Nat Commun. 2017 May 26;8:15605
pubmed: 28548094

Auteurs

Sukumaran Sunitha (S)

Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA.

Christopher D Rock (CD)

Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA. chris.rock@ttu.edu.

Articles similaires

Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis

Classifications MeSH