Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
aerosols
cloth masks
face masks
personal protection
respiratory protection
Journal
ACS nano
ISSN: 1936-086X
Titre abrégé: ACS Nano
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101313589
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 May 2020
26 May 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
12
6
2020
entrez:
25
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The emergence of a pandemic affecting the respiratory system can result in a significant demand for face masks. This includes the use of cloth masks by large sections of the public, as can be seen during the current global spread of COVID-19. However, there is limited knowledge available on the performance of various commonly available fabrics used in cloth masks. Importantly, there is a need to evaluate filtration efficiencies as a function of aerosol particulate sizes in the 10 nm to 10 μm range, which is particularly relevant for respiratory virus transmission. We have carried out these studies for several common fabrics including cotton, silk, chiffon, flannel, various synthetics, and their combinations. Although the filtration efficiencies for various fabrics when a single layer was used ranged from 5 to 80% and 5 to 95% for particle sizes of <300 nm and >300 nm, respectively, the efficiencies improved when multiple layers were used and when using a specific combination of different fabrics. Filtration efficiencies of the hybrids (such as cotton-silk, cotton-chiffon, cotton-flannel) was >80% (for particles <300 nm) and >90% (for particles >300 nm). We speculate that the enhanced performance of the hybrids is likely due to the combined effect of mechanical and electrostatic-based filtration. Cotton, the most widely used material for cloth masks performs better at higher weave densities (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32329337
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6339-6347Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn