Bacteriuria in Pregnancy in a Danish Contemporary Cohort of Women.
Adult
Age Factors
Bacteriuria
/ epidemiology
Cohort Studies
Denmark
/ epidemiology
Enterococcus
/ isolation & purification
Escherichia coli
/ isolation & purification
Escherichia coli Infections
/ epidemiology
Ethnicity
Female
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
/ epidemiology
Hospitals, University
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
/ epidemiology
Risk Factors
Streptococcal Infections
/ epidemiology
Streptococcus agalactiae
/ isolation & purification
Young Adult
Journal
Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1098-0997
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 9318481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
05
2019
revised:
02
09
2019
accepted:
03
10
2019
entrez:
13
5
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
16
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to describe bacteriuria with regard to the uropathogens found in relation to the frequency of urine culture tests in a contemporary cohort of pregnant Danish women. A historical cohort study of 24,817 pregnant women registered in the Danish Fetal Medicine Database at Aarhus University Hospital, from 2010 to 2014. Social security numbers were linked to the microbiological database with the registration of 17,233 urine cultures in 8,807 women. Bacteriuria was defined as 1 × 10 42% had a urine sample culture test at the hospital-the majority only once during pregnancy. 96% of all urine culture tests were negative. The bacteriuria incidence was 5.6%. The most frequent uropathogenic bacteria isolated were 96% of urine culture tests in pregnant women are negative. Optimized urine sampling may change this
Identifiants
pubmed: 32395068
doi: 10.1155/2020/8398537
pmc: PMC7199619
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8398537Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Vinnie H. Greve et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;11(3):593-608
pubmed: 9378925
Arch Intern Med. 1960 Feb;105:194-8
pubmed: 14404662
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Apr;73(4):576-82
pubmed: 2927852
Urol J. 2007 Winter;4(1):24-7
pubmed: 17514607
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;15(11):1324-33
pubmed: 26255208
J Urol. 1981 Mar;125(3):271-6
pubmed: 7009891
Urol Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;34(1):35-42
pubmed: 17145359
Ugeskr Laeger. 1978 Jul 10;140(28):1673-5
pubmed: 695027
Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;42(4):547-60
pubmed: 26475951
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 08;(9):CD007855
pubmed: 20824868
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36
pubmed: 21088663
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD002256
pubmed: 21249652
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;28(3):581-91
pubmed: 11512502
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;26(3):219-30
pubmed: 23612500
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD000490
pubmed: 17443502
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Mar;11(1):13-26
pubmed: 9067782
Ugeskr Laeger. 1988 Aug 22;150(34):2032-4
pubmed: 3046088