Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) and male infertility: characterization of five new cases, review of the literature, and perspectives.
Aneuploidy
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Infertility
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC)
Spermatogenesis
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
11
01
2020
accepted:
06
05
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
11
3
2021
entrez:
14
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in infertile males RESEARCH QUESTION: Are molecular cytogenetic methods still relevant for the identification and characterization of sSMC in the era of next-generation sequencing? In this paper, we report five males with oligoasthenozoospermia or azoospermia with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss in partnership in four cases. R-banding karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were performed and showed sSMC in all five cases. Microdissection and reverse-FISH were performed in one case. One sSMC, each, was derived from chromosome 15 and an X-chromosome; two sSMC were derivatives of chromosome 22. The fifth sSMC was a ring chromosome 4 complemented by a deletion of the same region 4p14 to 4p16.1 in one of the normal chromosomes 4. All markers were mosaics except one of sSMC(22). Through this study, we emphasize the necessity of a proper combination of high-throughput techniques with conventional cytogenetic and FISH methods. This could provide a personalized diagnostic and accurate results for the patients suffering from infertility or RPL. We also highlight FISH analyses, which are essential tools for detecting sSMC in infertile patients. In fact, despite its entire composition of heterochromatin, sSMC can have effects on spermatogenesis by producing mechanical perturbations during meiosis and increasing meiotic nondisjunction rate. This would contribute to understand the exact chromosomal mechanism disrupting the natural and the assisted reproduction leading to offer a personalized support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32399795
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01811-9
pii: 10.1007/s10815-020-01811-9
pmc: PMC7376793
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1729-1736Références
Clin Biochem. 2018 Dec;62:2-10
pubmed: 29555319
J Transl Med. 2019 Aug 14;17(1):267
pubmed: 31412890
Int J Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;8(1):35-42
pubmed: 24696767
Genet Med. 2006 Jul;8(7):459-62
pubmed: 16845280
Int J Mol Med. 2008 Jun;21(6):705-14
pubmed: 18506363
Mol Cytogenet. 2012 Mar 14;5:15
pubmed: 22413994
Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Feb 08;12:5
pubmed: 30774715
J Genet. 2019 Mar;98:
pubmed: 30945692
Clin Genet. 2000 Dec;58(6):488-92
pubmed: 11149620
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Dec;36(12):2533-2539
pubmed: 31720922
Cases J. 2009 Jan 08;2(1):28
pubmed: 19133129
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2014 Nov;60(11):583-6
pubmed: 25511948
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):484-9
pubmed: 25432924
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Jun;15(6):369-384
pubmed: 29622783
Med Sci Monit. 2005 Mar;11(3):CS9-15
pubmed: 15735571
Hum Genet. 1976 Aug 30;33(3):231-40
pubmed: 964985
Andrologia. 2018 Jan 15;:
pubmed: 29336050
Hum Mol Genet. 1999 Nov;8(12):2205-9
pubmed: 10545600
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):261-82
pubmed: 18252209
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jul;31(1):79-88
pubmed: 25985997
Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):188-96
pubmed: 24659916
J Androl. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):233-9
pubmed: 19059902
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):317-36
pubmed: 16192711
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015 Sep;169(3):216-23
pubmed: 26239400
Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1749-58
pubmed: 16497695
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;146(2):100-8
pubmed: 26398339
Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Oct;39(2):231-54
pubmed: 1052767
Mol Syndromol. 2016 Feb;6(5):210-21
pubmed: 26997941
Maedica (Bucur). 2012 Jan;7(1):25-9
pubmed: 23118816
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):292-301
pubmed: 11283701
Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1241-5
pubmed: 22884015
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;107(1-2):55-67
pubmed: 15305057
J Prenat Med. 2007 Jul;1(3):41-4
pubmed: 22470827
World J Mens Health. 2017 Dec;35(3):205-208
pubmed: 28879694
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(5):369-78
pubmed: 10515212
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 30;5:17408
pubmed: 26616419
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015 Jan;61(1):32-6
pubmed: 25374326
Adv Med Sci. 2006;51:31-5
pubmed: 17357273
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019 Jun;22(2):88-93
pubmed: 28715980
Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 23;16(1):132-139
pubmed: 29713544
Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1162-9.e7
pubmed: 25796321
Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):600-6
pubmed: 17517402
Sex Dev. 2018;12(6):281-287
pubmed: 30089300
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19375
pubmed: 32118782
Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2899-903
pubmed: 15958396
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jan;24(1):72-82
pubmed: 22116069
Int J Mol Med. 2007 May;19(5):719-31
pubmed: 17390076
Eur J Med Genet. 2012 Dec;55(12):743-6
pubmed: 23000562
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):398-410
pubmed: 18252220