Photodynamic inactivation mediated by methylene blue or chlorin e6 against Streptococcus mutans biofilm.


Journal

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy
ISSN: 1873-1597
Titre abrégé: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101226123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2019
revised: 21 03 2020
accepted: 04 05 2020
pubmed: 15 5 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 15 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An appropriate photosensitizer (PS) for photodynamic inactivation should have a pronounced antimicrobial efficacy but low dark toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the concentration-dependent antimicrobial efficacies of methylene blue (MB) and chlorin e6 (Ce6), against Streptococcus mutans biofilms and to compare the efficacies of these two PSs. The 48-h S. mutans UA159 biofilms, grown on glass coverslips, were subjected to MB or Ce6 at 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM with or without irradiation by 660 nM LED light (L). Control groups (-PS-L and -PS + L) were also included. Viability of the biofilm was analyzed by CFU/biofilm and biofilm lactic acid production was quantified by an enzymatic assay. With irradiation, MB under 25 μM resulted in 2-log reduction in biofilm viability and 30-fold reduction in biofilm lactic acid production. However, this biofilm killing efficacy did not change with increasing MB concentration. The biofilm killing efficacy of Ce6 increased with increasing Ce6 concentrations and resulted in 5-log reduction in biofilm viability. The lactic acid inhibitory effect of Ce6 was significantly lower than MB at 25 μM (p<0.01) but higher than MB at 200 μM (p=0.05), although the difference at 200 μM did not reach statistical significance. No dark toxicity could be observed for MB whereas low dark toxicity could be seen for Ce6 when the concentration is above 50 μM. Ce6 under 200 μM showed to be a more powerful PS for photodynamic inactivation than MB. Both Ce6- and MB-based photodynamic inactivation are useful methods for biofilm control in caries prevention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
An appropriate photosensitizer (PS) for photodynamic inactivation should have a pronounced antimicrobial efficacy but low dark toxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the concentration-dependent antimicrobial efficacies of methylene blue (MB) and chlorin e6 (Ce6), against Streptococcus mutans biofilms and to compare the efficacies of these two PSs.
METHODS METHODS
The 48-h S. mutans UA159 biofilms, grown on glass coverslips, were subjected to MB or Ce6 at 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM with or without irradiation by 660 nM LED light (L). Control groups (-PS-L and -PS + L) were also included. Viability of the biofilm was analyzed by CFU/biofilm and biofilm lactic acid production was quantified by an enzymatic assay.
RESULTS RESULTS
With irradiation, MB under 25 μM resulted in 2-log reduction in biofilm viability and 30-fold reduction in biofilm lactic acid production. However, this biofilm killing efficacy did not change with increasing MB concentration. The biofilm killing efficacy of Ce6 increased with increasing Ce6 concentrations and resulted in 5-log reduction in biofilm viability. The lactic acid inhibitory effect of Ce6 was significantly lower than MB at 25 μM (p<0.01) but higher than MB at 200 μM (p=0.05), although the difference at 200 μM did not reach statistical significance. No dark toxicity could be observed for MB whereas low dark toxicity could be seen for Ce6 when the concentration is above 50 μM.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Ce6 under 200 μM showed to be a more powerful PS for photodynamic inactivation than MB. Both Ce6- and MB-based photodynamic inactivation are useful methods for biofilm control in caries prevention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32407890
pii: S1572-1000(20)30171-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101817
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Chlorophyllides 0
Photosensitizing Agents 0
Porphyrins 0
phytochlorin 5S2CCF3T1Z
Methylene Blue T42P99266K

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101817

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Min Nie (M)

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Key Lab of Oral Diseases of Gansu Province, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, China.

Dong Mei Deng (DM)

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Yafei Wu (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Kleber Thiago de Oliveira (KT)

Federal University of São Carlos - UFSCar, Department of Chemistry, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato (VS)

University of São Paulo - USP, Physics Institute of São Carlos - IFSC, Optical Group, Campus São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Wim Crielaard (W)

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Alessandra Nara de Souza Rastelli (ANS)

University of São Paulo State - UNESP, Araraquara, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Campus Araraquara, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: alessandra.nara-souza-rastelli@unesp.br.

Articles similaires

Biofilms Candida albicans Quorum Sensing Candida glabrata Menthol
Female Biofilms Animals Lactobacillus Mice

Necroptosis as a consequence of photodynamic therapy in tumor cells.

Álvaro Carneiro de Souza, André Luiz Mencalha, Adenilson de Souza da Fonseca et al.
1.00
Photochemotherapy Humans Necroptosis Neoplasms Photosensitizing Agents
Neoplastic Stem Cells Animals Humans Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Tretinoin

Classifications MeSH