Visiting Professorship in Academic Radiation Oncology.
Chi-Square Distribution
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Faculty, Medical
/ classification
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Prospective Studies
Radiation Oncology
/ education
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
/ economics
Sex Distribution
Sex Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
United States
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2020
01 11 2020
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
revised:
28
04
2020
accepted:
01
05
2020
pubmed:
18
5
2020
medline:
10
4
2021
entrez:
18
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Visiting professorship is an enjoyable activity that is also influential in academic promotional processes as evidence of the invitee's national reputation. Little is known, however, about the factors considered when selecting visiting professors (VPs) or whether this practice reflects objective criteria. We sought to characterize the process and diversity of participants in visiting professorships within academic radiation oncology (RO) to determine whether opportunities are equitably distributed. Surveys were distributed to program directors (PDs) of every 2018 RO residency program accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. PDs were asked to identify all VPs over the past 2 years and to describe their departments' decision-making processes. Publicly available demographic and academic characteristics were obtained for each VP, and results were compared by VP gender and hosting program (HP) 2019 Doximity rank using the χ The PD response rate was 60 of 93 (65%); 6 surveys were ≥50% incomplete and were excluded. Over a 2-year timeframe, 51 of 54 departments hosted 233 VPs, of whom 29% were women. The mean number of hosted VPs (5; range, 1-19) and gender distribution (35% women; range, 0-100%) did not significantly differ by HP rank (P = .17 and 0.65, respectively), nor did the selection criteria by which VPs were primarily chosen (subject matter expertise, teaching reputation, and resident interest). Women received significantly lower honoraria amounts than men (P = .035) despite no significant differences by gender in academic rank (P = .71), VP department rank (0.19), or M-index (0.83). Although sample size is limited, this study suggests that academic RO programs have a relatively equitable approach to selecting VPs that emphasizes trainee education and reflects the gender diversity of RO faculty more generally. Care should be taken to ensure that these similarly qualified women are offered the same monetary amount of honoraria as their male colleagues.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32417406
pii: S0360-3016(20)31128-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
824-829Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.