Major cardiovascular events, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnosis
Cause of Death
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ diagnosis
Female
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
/ agonists
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ adverse effects
Incidence
Incretins
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ mortality
Protective Factors
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
All-cause mortality
Atrial fibrillation
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
Heart failure
Major amputations
Major cardiovascular events
Meta-analysis
Journal
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD
ISSN: 1590-3729
Titre abrégé: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9111474
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 06 2020
25 06 2020
Historique:
received:
21
01
2020
revised:
13
03
2020
accepted:
14
03
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
26
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RA) has been associated with a reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality on the basis of the results of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several meta-analyses on this issue have been recently published; however, they were all restricted to CVOT, with the exclusion of all studies designed for other endpoints; moreover, other cardiovascular endpoints, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure have not been fully explored. A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥52 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug. We included 43 trials, enrolling 63,134 patients. A significant reduction of MACE (MH-OR 0.87 [0.83, 0.92]), all-cause mortality (MH-OR 0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), and a nonstatistical trend toward reduction of heart failure (MH-OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.01]) was observed - GLP1-RA did not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (MH-OR 0.94 [0.84, 1.04]). The present meta-analysis confirms the favorable effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stroke, and possibly myocardial infarction. Conversely, the effects on heart failure remain uncertain. Available data on atrial fibrillation seems to exclude any major safety issues in this respect. CRD42018115577.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RA) has been associated with a reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality on the basis of the results of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several meta-analyses on this issue have been recently published; however, they were all restricted to CVOT, with the exclusion of all studies designed for other endpoints; moreover, other cardiovascular endpoints, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure have not been fully explored.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥52 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug. We included 43 trials, enrolling 63,134 patients. A significant reduction of MACE (MH-OR 0.87 [0.83, 0.92]), all-cause mortality (MH-OR 0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), and a nonstatistical trend toward reduction of heart failure (MH-OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.01]) was observed - GLP1-RA did not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (MH-OR 0.94 [0.84, 1.04]).
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis confirms the favorable effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stroke, and possibly myocardial infarction. Conversely, the effects on heart failure remain uncertain. Available data on atrial fibrillation seems to exclude any major safety issues in this respect.
REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO)
CRD42018115577.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32448716
pii: S0939-4753(20)30095-8
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.03.013
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
GLP1R protein, human
0
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Incretins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1106-1114Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest BN is presently employee of Novo Nordisk; ID has received speaking fees from Novonordisk; FT has no conflicts of interest to declare; EM has received consultancy fees from Merck and Novartis speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Novartis and research grants from Merck, Novartis, and Takeda. GS has received speaking fees from Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, L-Nutra, Theras, Sanofi, Mundipharma, Omikron, and Novartis, and consultancy fees from Servier, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Amgem and GlaxoSmithKline; MM has received speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Novartis and research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb. All the authors approved the final version of this manuscript. Dr. Matteo Monami is the person who takes full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, access to data, and the decision to submit and publish the manuscript.