Circulating tumor DNA analysis of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving osimertinib following previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.
Acrylamides
Aniline Compounds
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ genetics
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Circulating tumor DNA
EGFR
EGFR-TKI
Monitoring
NSCLC
Osimertinib
Journal
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-8332
Titre abrégé: Lung Cancer
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8800805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
11
02
2020
revised:
19
04
2020
accepted:
29
04
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis is rapidly gaining acceptance as a diagnostic tool to guide clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinically-actionable EGFR mutations can be detected in ctDNA before or after first-line EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) treatment, but data are limited for patients with a complex treatment history. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of ctDNA testing in a clinical setting of NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib as a second or third line EGFR-TKI. Twenty EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients, who had received osimertinib as a second or third line EGFR-TKI and had donated blood samples while attending routine follow-up consultations between April and November 2016, were retrospectively selected to test plasma cfDNA for tumor-guided EGFR mutations. We used EGFR mutations previously identified in tumor-tissue to retrospectively test plasma ctDNA from 20 patients who had received osimertinib as a second or third line EGFR-TKI. Both EGFR-TKI sensitising and T790 M resistance mutations were analysed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in plasma taken alongside routine consultations and ctDNA detection was correlated with response under osimertinib. Follow-up solid-tissue biopsies were obtained after disease progression. CtDNA was detected under osimertinib treatment in four out of the eight patients (50 %) who showed no response, two out of the seven (29 %) who showed an initial response and none of the five patients (0 %) who showed an ongoing response. The fraction of EGFR-mutant ctDNA in plasma tended to be higher in non-responders (0.1-68 %), compared to the initial responders (0.2-1.1 %). Blood samples were donated up to 34, 27 and 49 weeks after the start of osimertinib for the non-, initial and ongoing responders, respectively. These findings support a potential role for ctDNA analysis in response monitoring of NSCLC patients with a complex EGFR-TKI treatment history. The weak trend between ctDNA detection and disease progression warrants larger studies to further investigate potential clinical utility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32460198
pii: S0169-5002(20)30409-8
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.04.039
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylamides
0
Aniline Compounds
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
osimertinib
3C06JJ0Z2O
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173-180Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest DAMH has been on the speakers’ bureau of QIAGEN, serves occasionally on the scientific advisory boards of Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and is minority shareholder of Self-screen B.V., a spin-off company of VUmc. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.