Disability progression
Multiple sclerosis
disability progression
disease-modifying therapies
relapsing/remitting
Journal
Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)
ISSN: 1477-0970
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9509185
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
25
9
2021
entrez:
29
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disability progression independent of relapses (PIRA) has been described as a frequent phenomenon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To compare the occurrence of disability progression in relapse-free RRMS patients on interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) versus fingolimod. This study is based on data from the Swiss association for joint tasks of health insurers. Time to relapse and 12-month confirmed disability progression were compared between treatment groups using multivariable Cox regression analysis with confounder adjustment. Inverse-probability weighting was applied to correct for the bias that patients on fingolimod have a higher chance to remain relapse-free than patients on IFN/GA. We included 1640 patients (64% IFN/GA, 36% fingolimod, median total follow-up time = 4-5 years). Disease-modifying treatment (DMT) groups were well balanced with regard to potential confounders. Disability progression was observed in 155 patients (8.8%) on IFN/GA and 51 (7.6%) on fingolimod, of which 44 and 23 were relapse-free during the initial DMT, respectively. Adjusted standard regression analysis on all patients indicated that those on fingolimod experience less frequently disability progression compared with IFN/GA (hazard ratio = 0.53 (95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.76)). After bias correction, this was also true for patients without relapses (hazard ratio=0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.98). Our analysis indicates that fingolimod is superior to IFN/GA in preventing disability progression in both relapsing
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Disability progression independent of relapses (PIRA) has been described as a frequent phenomenon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
OBJECTIVE
To compare the occurrence of disability progression in relapse-free RRMS patients on interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) versus fingolimod.
METHODS
This study is based on data from the Swiss association for joint tasks of health insurers. Time to relapse and 12-month confirmed disability progression were compared between treatment groups using multivariable Cox regression analysis with confounder adjustment. Inverse-probability weighting was applied to correct for the bias that patients on fingolimod have a higher chance to remain relapse-free than patients on IFN/GA.
RESULTS
We included 1640 patients (64% IFN/GA, 36% fingolimod, median total follow-up time = 4-5 years). Disease-modifying treatment (DMT) groups were well balanced with regard to potential confounders. Disability progression was observed in 155 patients (8.8%) on IFN/GA and 51 (7.6%) on fingolimod, of which 44 and 23 were relapse-free during the initial DMT, respectively. Adjusted standard regression analysis on all patients indicated that those on fingolimod experience less frequently disability progression compared with IFN/GA (hazard ratio = 0.53 (95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.76)). After bias correction, this was also true for patients without relapses (hazard ratio=0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.98).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis indicates that fingolimod is superior to IFN/GA in preventing disability progression in both relapsing
Identifiants
pubmed: 32463336
doi: 10.1177/1352458520918489
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Glatiramer Acetate
5M691HL4BO
Interferon-beta
77238-31-4
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
G926EC510T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM