Disability progression


Journal

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)
ISSN: 1477-0970
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9509185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 29 5 2020
medline: 25 9 2021
entrez: 29 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Disability progression independent of relapses (PIRA) has been described as a frequent phenomenon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To compare the occurrence of disability progression in relapse-free RRMS patients on interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) versus fingolimod. This study is based on data from the Swiss association for joint tasks of health insurers. Time to relapse and 12-month confirmed disability progression were compared between treatment groups using multivariable Cox regression analysis with confounder adjustment. Inverse-probability weighting was applied to correct for the bias that patients on fingolimod have a higher chance to remain relapse-free than patients on IFN/GA. We included 1640 patients (64% IFN/GA, 36% fingolimod, median total follow-up time = 4-5 years). Disease-modifying treatment (DMT) groups were well balanced with regard to potential confounders. Disability progression was observed in 155 patients (8.8%) on IFN/GA and 51 (7.6%) on fingolimod, of which 44 and 23 were relapse-free during the initial DMT, respectively. Adjusted standard regression analysis on all patients indicated that those on fingolimod experience less frequently disability progression compared with IFN/GA (hazard ratio = 0.53 (95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.76)). After bias correction, this was also true for patients without relapses (hazard ratio=0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.98). Our analysis indicates that fingolimod is superior to IFN/GA in preventing disability progression in both relapsing

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Disability progression independent of relapses (PIRA) has been described as a frequent phenomenon in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
OBJECTIVE
To compare the occurrence of disability progression in relapse-free RRMS patients on interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) versus fingolimod.
METHODS
This study is based on data from the Swiss association for joint tasks of health insurers. Time to relapse and 12-month confirmed disability progression were compared between treatment groups using multivariable Cox regression analysis with confounder adjustment. Inverse-probability weighting was applied to correct for the bias that patients on fingolimod have a higher chance to remain relapse-free than patients on IFN/GA.
RESULTS
We included 1640 patients (64% IFN/GA, 36% fingolimod, median total follow-up time = 4-5 years). Disease-modifying treatment (DMT) groups were well balanced with regard to potential confounders. Disability progression was observed in 155 patients (8.8%) on IFN/GA and 51 (7.6%) on fingolimod, of which 44 and 23 were relapse-free during the initial DMT, respectively. Adjusted standard regression analysis on all patients indicated that those on fingolimod experience less frequently disability progression compared with IFN/GA (hazard ratio = 0.53 (95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.76)). After bias correction, this was also true for patients without relapses (hazard ratio=0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.98).
CONCLUSION
Our analysis indicates that fingolimod is superior to IFN/GA in preventing disability progression in both relapsing

Identifiants

pubmed: 32463336
doi: 10.1177/1352458520918489
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Glatiramer Acetate 5M691HL4BO
Interferon-beta 77238-31-4
Fingolimod Hydrochloride G926EC510T

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

439-448

Auteurs

Viktor von Wyl (V)

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland/ Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Pascal Benkert (P)

Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

André Moser (A)

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Johannes Lorscheider (J)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Bernhard Décard (B)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Peter Hänni (P)

Swiss Association for Joint Tasks of Health Insurers, Solothurn, Switzerland.

Carmen Lienert (C)

Department of Neurology, Rheinburg-Klinik, Walzenhausen, Switzerland.

Jens Kuhle (J)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Tobias Derfuss (T)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Ludwig Kappos (L)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Özgür Yaldizli (Ö)

Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH