EUPRON: nurses' practice in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in Europe. A cross-sectional survey in 17 countries.
health services administration & management
international health services
quality in healthcare
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 06 2020
03 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
6
6
2020
pubmed:
6
6
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Safe pharmaceutical care (PC) requires an interprofessional team approach, involving physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Nurses' roles however, are not always explicit and clear, complicating interprofessional collaboration. The aim of this study is to describe nurses' practice and interprofessional collaboration in PC, from the viewpoint of nurses, physicians and pharmacists. A cross-sectional survey. The study was conducted in 17 European countries, each with their own health systems. Pharmacists, physicians and nurses with an active role in PC were surveyed. Nurses' involvement in PC, experiences of interprofessional collaboration and communication and views on nurses' competences. A total of 4888 nurses, 974 physicians and 857 pharmacists from 17 European countries responded. Providing patient education and information (PEI), monitoring medicines adherence (MMA), monitoring adverse/therapeutic effects (ME) and prescribing medicines were considered integral to nursing practice by 78%, 73%, 69% and 15% of nurses, respectively. Most respondents were convinced that quality of PC would be improved by increasing nurses' involvement in ME (95%), MMA (95%), PEI (91%) and prescribing (53%). Mean scores for the reported quality of collaboration between nurses and physicians, collaboration between nurses and pharmacists and interprofessional communication were respectively <7/10, ≤4/10, <6/10 for all four aspects of PC. ME, MMA, PEI and prescribing are part of nurses' activities, and most healthcare professionals felt their involvement should be extended. Collaboration between nurses and physicians on PC is limited and between nurses and pharmacists even more.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32499269
pii: bmjopen-2019-036269
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036269
pmc: PMC7282395
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e036269Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;64(5):451-6
pubmed: 18204835
J Interprof Care. 2005 Mar;19(2):164-70
pubmed: 15823891
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Sep 18;6(3):
pubmed: 30231573
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Oct;18(7):853-61
pubmed: 20946221
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jul;101(7):1175-1192
pubmed: 29628282
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):649-54
pubmed: 27351385
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD000072
pubmed: 28639262
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Adv Nurs. 1999 May;29(5):1068-81
pubmed: 10320489
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):179
pubmed: 30068328
BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):15-9
pubmed: 15231615
J Patient Saf. 2017 Dec 15;:
pubmed: 29252966
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):1198-1208
pubmed: 29148105
Oman Med J. 2014 Jul;29(4):271-5
pubmed: 25170408
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e022202
pubmed: 30139905
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):199-205
pubmed: 21658097
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Aug;21(8):614-36
pubmed: 26233535
Nurs Times. 2000 Apr 13-19;96(15):39-40
pubmed: 11309957
Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Feb;38(1):52-4
pubmed: 23495371
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Mar 1;61(5):483-7
pubmed: 15018225
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Sep;14(5):544-50
pubmed: 24999074
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):396-401
pubmed: 22371379
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Mar;47(3):533-43
pubmed: 2316538
J Adv Nurs. 2010 May;66(5):1072-9
pubmed: 20337787
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):927-934
pubmed: 27485719