Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O'Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015.
Identification
Multilocus sequence analysis
Proteus
Taxonomy
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 06 2020
10 06 2020
Historique:
received:
05
03
2020
accepted:
04
06
2020
entrez:
12
6
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
27
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Members of the genus Proteus are mostly opportunistic pathogens that cause a variety of infections in humans. The molecular evolutionary characteristics and genetic relationships among Proteus species have not been elucidated to date. In this study, we developed a multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach based on five housekeeping genes (HKGs) to delineate phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus Proteus. Of all 223 Proteus strains collected in the current study, the phylogenetic tree of five concatenated HKGs (dnaJ, mdh, pyrC, recA and rpoD) divided 223 strains into eleven clusters, which were representative of 11 species of Proteus. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic trees of the five individual HKGs also corresponded to that of the concatenated tree, except for recA, which clustered four strains at an independent cluster. The evaluation of inter- and intraspecies distances of HKG concatenation indicated that all interspecies distances were significantly different from intraspecies distances, which revealed that these HKG concatenations can be used as gene markers to distinguish different Proteus species. Further web-based DNA-DNA hybridization estimated by genome of type strains confirmed the validity of the MLSA, and each of eleven clusters was congruent with the most abundant Proteus species. In addition, we used the established MLSA method to identify the randomly collected Proteus and found that P. mirabilis is the most abundant species. However, the second most abundant species is P. terrae but not P. vulgaris. Combined with the genetic, genomic and phenotypic characteristics, these findings indicate that three species, P. terrae, P. cibarius and Proteus genospecies 5, should be regarded as heterotypic synonyms, and the species should be renamed P. terrae, while Proteus genospecies 5 has not been named to date. This study suggested that MLSA is a powerful method for the discrimination and classification of Proteus at the species level. The MLSA scheme provides a rapid and inexpensive means of identifying Proteus strains. The identification of Proteus species determined by the MLSA approach plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Proteus infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Members of the genus Proteus are mostly opportunistic pathogens that cause a variety of infections in humans. The molecular evolutionary characteristics and genetic relationships among Proteus species have not been elucidated to date. In this study, we developed a multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach based on five housekeeping genes (HKGs) to delineate phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus Proteus.
RESULTS
Of all 223 Proteus strains collected in the current study, the phylogenetic tree of five concatenated HKGs (dnaJ, mdh, pyrC, recA and rpoD) divided 223 strains into eleven clusters, which were representative of 11 species of Proteus. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic trees of the five individual HKGs also corresponded to that of the concatenated tree, except for recA, which clustered four strains at an independent cluster. The evaluation of inter- and intraspecies distances of HKG concatenation indicated that all interspecies distances were significantly different from intraspecies distances, which revealed that these HKG concatenations can be used as gene markers to distinguish different Proteus species. Further web-based DNA-DNA hybridization estimated by genome of type strains confirmed the validity of the MLSA, and each of eleven clusters was congruent with the most abundant Proteus species. In addition, we used the established MLSA method to identify the randomly collected Proteus and found that P. mirabilis is the most abundant species. However, the second most abundant species is P. terrae but not P. vulgaris. Combined with the genetic, genomic and phenotypic characteristics, these findings indicate that three species, P. terrae, P. cibarius and Proteus genospecies 5, should be regarded as heterotypic synonyms, and the species should be renamed P. terrae, while Proteus genospecies 5 has not been named to date.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggested that MLSA is a powerful method for the discrimination and classification of Proteus at the species level. The MLSA scheme provides a rapid and inexpensive means of identifying Proteus strains. The identification of Proteus species determined by the MLSA approach plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Proteus infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32522175
doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1
pii: 10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1
pmc: PMC7288399
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152Subventions
Organisme : the National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31570134
Pays : International
Organisme : the National Sci-Tech Key Project from the Ministry of Health, China
ID : 2018ZX10734404, 2018ZX10102001
Pays : International
Références
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jan;53(1):35-42
pubmed: 25339391
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016 Feb;66(2):1100-1103
pubmed: 26585518
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Sep;71(9):5107-15
pubmed: 16151093
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000 Sep;50 Pt 5:1869-1875
pubmed: 11034498
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018 Apr;68(4):1390-1395
pubmed: 29509133
mBio. 2014 Nov 18;5(6):e02136
pubmed: 25406383
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Oct;13(4):534-46
pubmed: 11023955
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Mar;61(1):65-89
pubmed: 9106365
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Dec;108(6):1457-1468
pubmed: 26437638
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018 Feb;68(2):552-557
pubmed: 29297845
BMC Genomics. 2011 May 12;12:237
pubmed: 21569439
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1097-102
pubmed: 7050147
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015 Jul;38(5):305-14
pubmed: 26007614
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2017 Apr;40(3):179-189
pubmed: 28214058
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019 Mar;69(3):852-858
pubmed: 30663957
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Feb 21;14:60
pubmed: 23432962
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jul;36(5):309-19
pubmed: 23632228
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Oct;45(4):870-1
pubmed: 7547312
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):404-5
pubmed: 3517057
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016 Jun;66(6):2158-2164
pubmed: 26944634
Infect Immun. 2002 Jan;70(1):389-94
pubmed: 11748205
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 08;8(10):e75797
pubmed: 24116076
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011 May;34(3):189-99
pubmed: 21353754
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015 Jun;38(4):237-45
pubmed: 25959541
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2016 Sep;39(6):361-9
pubmed: 27238556
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Jun 13;31(3):
pubmed: 29899011
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Sep 08;6:359
pubmed: 24010733
Clin Genet. 2014 Feb;85(2):111-9
pubmed: 23992099