Feasibility of Ultra-Rapid Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions in the Australian Public Health Care System.
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 06 2020
23 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
6
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Widespread adoption of rapid genomic testing in pediatric critical care requires robust clinical and laboratory pathways that provide equitable and consistent service across health care systems. To prospectively evaluate the performance of a multicenter network for ultra-rapid genomic diagnosis in a public health care system. Descriptive feasibility study of critically ill pediatric patients with suspected monogenic conditions treated at 12 Australian hospitals between March 2018 and February 2019, with data collected to May 2019. A formal implementation strategy emphasizing communication and feedback, standardized processes, coordination, distributed leadership, and collective learning was used to facilitate adoption. Ultra-rapid exome sequencing. The primary outcome was time from sample receipt to ultra-rapid exome sequencing report. The secondary outcomes were the molecular diagnostic yield, the change in clinical management after the ultra-rapid exome sequencing report, the time from hospital admission to the laboratory report, and the proportion of laboratory reports returned prior to death or hospital discharge. The study population included 108 patients with a median age of 28 days (range, 0 days to 17 years); 34% were female; and 57% were from neonatal intensive care units, 33% were from pediatric intensive care units, and 9% were from other hospital wards. The mean time from sample receipt to ultra-rapid exome sequencing report was 3.3 days (95% CI, 3.2-3.5 days) and the median time was 3 days (range, 2-7 days). The mean time from hospital admission to ultra-rapid exome sequencing report was 17.5 days (95% CI, 14.6-21.1 days) and 93 reports (86%) were issued prior to death or hospital discharge. A molecular diagnosis was established in 55 patients (51%). Eleven diagnoses (20%) resulted from using the following approaches to augment standard exome sequencing analysis: mitochondrial genome sequencing analysis, exome sequencing-based copy number analysis, use of international databases to identify novel gene-disease associations, and additional phenotyping and RNA analysis. In 42 of 55 patients (76%) with a molecular diagnosis and 6 of 53 patients (11%) without a molecular diagnosis, the ultra-rapid exome sequencing result was considered as having influenced clinical management. Targeted treatments were initiated in 12 patients (11%), treatment was redirected toward palliative care in 14 patients (13%), and surveillance for specific complications was initiated in 19 patients (18%). This study suggests feasibility of ultra-rapid genomic testing in critically ill pediatric patients with suspected monogenic conditions in the Australian public health care system. However, further research is needed to understand the clinical value of such testing, and the generalizability of the findings to other health care settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32573669
pii: 2767327
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7671
pmc: PMC7312414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2503-2511Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):7-14
pubmed: 31271757
Hum Mutat. 2019 Mar;40(3):267-280
pubmed: 30520571
Genet Med. 2020 Apr;22(4):736-744
pubmed: 31780822
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Apr 24;11(489):
pubmed: 31019026
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63
pubmed: 29706132
NPJ Genom Med. 2018 Apr 4;3:10
pubmed: 29644095
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;20(11):1007-1020
pubmed: 31246743
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):269-271
pubmed: 30100610
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):498-504
pubmed: 29895853
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 4;171(12):e173438
pubmed: 28973083
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Brain. 2019 Aug 1;142(8):e40
pubmed: 31243445
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec;27(12):1821-1826
pubmed: 31358953
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct;27(10):1493-1501
pubmed: 31148592
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct 3;105(4):719-733
pubmed: 31564432
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26
pubmed: 22310560
J Med Genet. 2018 Nov;55(11):721-728
pubmed: 30049826
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068
pubmed: 31076440
Genet Med. 2018 Dec;20(12):1554-1563
pubmed: 29543227
Brain. 2019 May 1;142(5):1195-1202
pubmed: 30915432
Mol Syndromol. 2020 Feb;11(1):50-55
pubmed: 32256302
Hum Mutat. 2015 Oct;36(10):928-30
pubmed: 26220891
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):627-636
pubmed: 30847515
NPJ Genom Med. 2018 Feb 9;3:6
pubmed: 29449963