Ex vivo modelling of drug efficacy in a rare metastatic urachal carcinoma.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 06 05 2019
accepted: 19 06 2020
entrez: 25 6 2020
pubmed: 25 6 2020
medline: 30 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ex vivo drug screening refers to the out-of-body assessment of drug efficacy in patient derived vital tumor cells. The purpose of these methods is to enable functional testing of patient specific efficacy of anti-cancer therapeutics and personalized treatment strategies. Such approaches could prove powerful especially in context of rare cancers for which demonstration of novel therapies is difficult due to the low numbers of patients. Here, we report comparison of different ex vivo drug screening methods in a metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive non-urothelial bladder malignancy that arises from the remnant embryologic urachus in adults. To compare the feasibility and results obtained with alternative ex vivo drug screening techniques, we used three different approaches; enzymatic cell viability assay of 2D cell cultures and image-based cytometry of 2D and 3D cell cultures in parallel. Vital tumor cells isolated from a biopsy obtained in context of a surgical debulking procedure were used for screening of 1160 drugs with the aim to evaluate patterns of efficacy in the urachal cancer cells. Dose response data from the enzymatic cell viability assay and the image-based assay of 2D cell cultures showed the best consistency. With 3D cell culture conditions, the proliferation rate of the tumor cells was slower and potency of several drugs was reduced even following growth rate normalization of the responses. MEK, mTOR, and MET inhibitors were identified as the most cytotoxic targeted drugs. Secondary validation analyses confirmed the efficacy of these drugs also with the new human urachal adenocarcinoma cell line (MISB18) established from the patient's tumor. All the tested ex vivo drug screening methods captured the patient's tumor cells' sensitivity to drugs that could be associated with the oncogenic KRAS

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ex vivo drug screening refers to the out-of-body assessment of drug efficacy in patient derived vital tumor cells. The purpose of these methods is to enable functional testing of patient specific efficacy of anti-cancer therapeutics and personalized treatment strategies. Such approaches could prove powerful especially in context of rare cancers for which demonstration of novel therapies is difficult due to the low numbers of patients. Here, we report comparison of different ex vivo drug screening methods in a metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive non-urothelial bladder malignancy that arises from the remnant embryologic urachus in adults.
METHODS METHODS
To compare the feasibility and results obtained with alternative ex vivo drug screening techniques, we used three different approaches; enzymatic cell viability assay of 2D cell cultures and image-based cytometry of 2D and 3D cell cultures in parallel. Vital tumor cells isolated from a biopsy obtained in context of a surgical debulking procedure were used for screening of 1160 drugs with the aim to evaluate patterns of efficacy in the urachal cancer cells.
RESULTS RESULTS
Dose response data from the enzymatic cell viability assay and the image-based assay of 2D cell cultures showed the best consistency. With 3D cell culture conditions, the proliferation rate of the tumor cells was slower and potency of several drugs was reduced even following growth rate normalization of the responses. MEK, mTOR, and MET inhibitors were identified as the most cytotoxic targeted drugs. Secondary validation analyses confirmed the efficacy of these drugs also with the new human urachal adenocarcinoma cell line (MISB18) established from the patient's tumor.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
All the tested ex vivo drug screening methods captured the patient's tumor cells' sensitivity to drugs that could be associated with the oncogenic KRAS

Identifiants

pubmed: 32576176
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07092-w
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07092-w
pmc: PMC7313172
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
KRAS protein, human 0
MTOR protein, human EC 2.7.1.1
MET protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met EC 2.7.10.1
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases EC 2.7.11.1
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases EC 2.7.12.2
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

590

Subventions

Organisme : AstraZeneca
ID : 18122013

Références

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183074
pubmed: 28877221
Int J Urol. 2007 Oct;14(10):963-5
pubmed: 17880303
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):e70-e80
pubmed: 26868356
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):771-775
pubmed: 27178450
Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 28;7(26):39293-39301
pubmed: 27283768
Cell Syst. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):35-48.e5
pubmed: 31302153
Eur Urol. 2019 Oct;76(4):430-434
pubmed: 31256944
Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):440-6
pubmed: 20068163
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1981 Oct;34(10):1248-52
pubmed: 7309620
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jul;145:27-32
pubmed: 32388277
Mol Cancer Ther. 2010 Dec;9(12):3175-85
pubmed: 21159605
Hum Pathol. 2014 Feb;45(2):327-30
pubmed: 24355196
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Aug;14(8):513-5
pubmed: 26228747
Anticancer Res. 2019 Nov;39(11):5867-5877
pubmed: 31704811
J Vis Exp. 2013 Jan 03;(71):
pubmed: 23328888
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Aug 26;12(8):
pubmed: 31451464
Int J Urol. 2020 Feb;27(2):157-162
pubmed: 31793080
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):e449-52
pubmed: 27102403
Chemotherapy. 2013;59(6):402-6
pubmed: 24969043
Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;110(11):2434-40
pubmed: 17932892
Br J Cancer. 2020 Mar;122(6):735-744
pubmed: 31894140
Cells. 2020 Jan 13;9(1):
pubmed: 31941155
Sci Rep. 2017 May 4;7(1):1502
pubmed: 28473715
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 May;33(5):659-68
pubmed: 19252435
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 19;9(1):2404
pubmed: 29921838
Mol Oncol. 2018 Aug;12(8):1296-1307
pubmed: 29901861
Can J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(2):5120-3
pubmed: 20398453
Urol Int. 2012;88(2):209-14
pubmed: 22143067
Urol Case Rep. 2014 Dec 23;3(2):9-11
pubmed: 26793485
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1740-1744
pubmed: 31003721
Cancer Discov. 2017 May;7(5):462-477
pubmed: 28331002
Cancer. 2006 Aug 15;107(4):712-20
pubmed: 16826585
Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;143(7):1764-1773
pubmed: 29672836
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e595-e606
pubmed: 29153976
Adv Anat Pathol. 2016 Mar;23(2):71-83
pubmed: 26849813
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):302-321
pubmed: 28108460
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1295-8
pubmed: 12629346
Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):388-98
pubmed: 27267737
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1062-D1067
pubmed: 29165669
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Mar;14(3):E57-E64
pubmed: 31348743
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):33.e11-33.e19
pubmed: 27592530

Auteurs

Rami Mäkelä (R)

Misvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.

Antti Arjonen (A)

Misvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Brinter Ltd, Turku, Finland.

Ville Härmä (V)

Misvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Nina Rintanen (N)

Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Lauri Paasonen (L)

UPM-Kymmene Corporation, Helsinki, Finland.

Tobias Paprotka (T)

Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH, Constance, Germany.

Kerstin Rönsch (K)

Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH, Constance, Germany.

Teijo Kuopio (T)

Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Juha Kononen (J)

Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Docrates Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Juha K Rantala (JK)

Misvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. rantala@misvik.com.
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. rantala@misvik.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH