Kinome capture sequencing of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma reveals novel mutations in the JAK3 gene.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
19
01
2020
accepted:
22
06
2020
entrez:
9
7
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
12
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) remains the deadliest form of epithelial ovarian cancer and despite major efforts little improvement in overall survival has been achieved. Identification of recurring "driver" genetic lesions has the potential to enable design of novel therapies for cancer. Here, we report on a study to find such new therapeutic targets for HGSOC using exome-capture sequencing approach targeting all kinase genes in 127 patient samples. Consistent with previous reports, the most frequently mutated gene was TP53 (97% mutation frequency) followed by BRCA1 (10% mutation frequency). The average mutation frequency of the kinase genes mutated from our panel was 1.5%. Intriguingly, after BRCA1, JAK3 was the most frequently mutated gene (4% mutation frequency). We tested the transforming properties of JAK3 mutants using the Ba/F3 cell-based in vitro functional assay and identified a novel gain-of-function mutation in the kinase domain of JAK3 (p.T1022I). Importantly, p.T1022I JAK3 mutants displayed higher sensitivity to the JAK3-selective inhibitor Tofacitinib compared to controls. For independent validation, we re-sequenced the entire JAK3 coding sequence using tagged amplicon sequencing (TAm-Seq) in 463 HGSOCs resulting in an overall somatic mutation frequency of 1%. TAm-Seq screening of CDK12 in the same population revealed a 7% mutation frequency. Our data confirms that the frequency of mutations in kinase genes in HGSOC is low and provides accurate estimates for the frequency of JAK3 and CDK12 mutations in a large well characterized cohort. Although p.T1022I JAK3 mutations are rare, our functional validation shows that if detected they should be considered as potentially actionable for therapy. The observation of CDK12 mutations in 7% of HGSOC cases provides a strong rationale for routine somatic testing, although more functional and clinical characterization is required to understand which nonsynonymous mutations alterations are associated with homologous recombination deficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32639993
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235766
pii: PONE-D-20-01710
pmc: PMC7343160
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
TP53 protein, human
0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Protein Kinases
EC 2.7.-
JAK3 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.2
Janus Kinase 3
EC 2.7.10.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0235766Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 15601
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Protoc. 2016 Jan;11(1):1-9
pubmed: 26633127
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Nature. 2012 Aug 30;488(7413):660-4
pubmed: 22895193
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24433
pubmed: 21931712
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2403-2415
pubmed: 31562800
J Med Genet. 2014 Feb;51(2):108-13
pubmed: 24277755
J Pathol. 2010 May;221(1):49-56
pubmed: 20229506
Cell. 2016 Jul 28;166(3):755-765
pubmed: 27372738
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1262-1270
pubmed: 30104763
Mol Immunol. 2004 Jul;41(6-7):727-37
pubmed: 15220007
Cancer Cell. 2018 Apr 9;33(4):690-705.e9
pubmed: 29622464
J Biol Chem. 2014 Mar 28;289(13):9247-53
pubmed: 24554720
Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1
pubmed: 23550210
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Sci Transl Med. 2012 May 30;4(136):136ra68
pubmed: 22649089
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2391-2402
pubmed: 31562799
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):489-94
pubmed: 26017449
PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 24;12(2):e1001789
pubmed: 25710373
PLoS Genet. 2007 Mar 16;3(3):e42
pubmed: 17367212
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Mar 11;43(5):2575-89
pubmed: 25712099
Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):917-21
pubmed: 15829967
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):554-9
pubmed: 23791828
Br J Haematol. 2007 May;137(4):337-41
pubmed: 17456055
Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;76(7):1882-91
pubmed: 26787835
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jul;126(1):103-8
pubmed: 22484402
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Nov;15(11):668-79
pubmed: 26493647
Leukemia. 2003 Dec;17(12):2257-317
pubmed: 14671650
Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;75(4):628-34
pubmed: 25634215
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):913-7
pubmed: 15829966
Int J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;17(5):430-40
pubmed: 22926640
Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 May;123(5):289-97
pubmed: 25655233
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014 Dec 24;2:167
pubmed: 25589003
Int J Cancer. 2012 Apr 15;130(8):1861-9
pubmed: 21796628
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2416-2428
pubmed: 31851799
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Jun;9(6):415-28
pubmed: 19461667
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2484-96
pubmed: 22204725
Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 1;74(1):287-97
pubmed: 24240700
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
Nat Cell Biol. 2006 Aug;8(8):877-84
pubmed: 16862142
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 15;18(20):5806-15
pubmed: 22912389
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30
pubmed: 26742998
Bioinformatics. 2010 Aug 15;26(16):2069-70
pubmed: 20562413
Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Apr;26(7):2736-45
pubmed: 16537916
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Sep 1;39(17):e118
pubmed: 21727090
Nat Methods. 2010 Apr;7(4):248-9
pubmed: 20354512
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):532-9
pubmed: 26681675
Nat Protoc. 2013 Mar;8(3):602-26
pubmed: 23449254
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 05;6:18517
pubmed: 26729235
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Mar;14(2):178-92
pubmed: 22517427