Improving the genome editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and Medicago truncatula.
CRISPR/Cas9
Dicots
Genome editing
Mutation efficiency
Promoters
Journal
Planta
ISSN: 1432-2048
Titre abrégé: Planta
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1250576
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2020
08 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2020
accepted:
23
06
2020
entrez:
10
7
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An improved CRISPR/Cas9 system with the Arabidopsis UBQ10 promoter-driven Cas9 exhibits consistently high mutation efficiency in Arabidopsis and M. truncatula. CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome editing technology that has been applied in several crop species for trait improvement due to its simplicity, versatility, and specificity. However, the mutation efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and M. truncatula (Mt) is still challenging and inconsistent. To analyze the functionality of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in two model dicot species, four different promoter-driven Cas9 systems to target phytoene desaturase (PDS) genes were designed. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was used for the delivery of constructed vectors to host plants. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses revealed that the Arabidopsis UBQ10 promoter-driven Cas9 significantly improves the mutation efficiency to 95% in Arabidopsis and 70% in M. truncatula. Moreover, the UBQ10-Cas9 system yielded 11% homozygous mutants in the T1 generation in Arabidopsis. Sequencing analyses of mutation events indicated that single-nucleotide insertions are the most frequent events in Arabidopsis, whereas multi-nucleotide deletions are dominant in bi-allelic and mono-allelic homozygous mutants in M. truncatula. Taken together, the UBQ10 promoter facilitates the best improvement in the CRISPR/Cas9 efficiency in PDS gene editing, followed by the EC1.2 promoter. Consistently, the improved UBQ10-Cas9 vector highly enhanced the mutation efficiency by four-fold over the commonly used 35S promoter in both dicot species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32642859
doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03415-0
pii: 10.1007/s00425-020-03415-0
pmc: PMC7343739
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Références
Plant Methods. 2016 Apr 25;12:23
pubmed: 27118985
Planta. 2018 Apr;247(4):1043-1050
pubmed: 29492697
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Aug;31(8):684-6
pubmed: 23929337
Plant Biotechnol J. 2018 Jun;16(6):1125-1137
pubmed: 29087011
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0204778
pubmed: 30625150
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 21;6:24765
pubmed: 27097775
Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Mar;21(5):895-906
pubmed: 8385509
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1156-60
pubmed: 8577732
Plant Cell. 2017 Jun;29(6):1196-1217
pubmed: 28522548
Plant Cell Rep. 2017 Feb;36(2):371-374
pubmed: 27834007
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jun 10;12(6):e1001877
pubmed: 24915127
Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):816-21
pubmed: 22745249
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 23;12(1):e0170552
pubmed: 28114398
Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Jan;87(1-2):99-110
pubmed: 25344637
Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):735-43
pubmed: 10069079
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 03;9:916
pubmed: 30018630
Plant Cell Rep. 2017 Mar;36(3):399-406
pubmed: 27995308
Sci Rep. 2016 May 26;6:26685
pubmed: 27226176
Plant Cell Rep. 2015 Sep;34(9):1473-6
pubmed: 26082432
Genetics. 2010 Oct;186(2):757-61
pubmed: 20660643
Genome Biol. 2015 Jul 21;16:144
pubmed: 26193878
Plant Physiol. 2014 Nov;166(3):1292-7
pubmed: 25225186
Plant J. 2018 Jan;93(2):377-386
pubmed: 29161464
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 24;11:294
pubmed: 32265954
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;31(6):530-2
pubmed: 23666012
Planta. 2015 Jan;241(1):271-84
pubmed: 25269397
Mol Plant. 2015 Aug;8(8):1274-84
pubmed: 25917172
Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 May;57(5):1058-68
pubmed: 26936792
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Jul 31;8(8):2603-2615
pubmed: 29884615
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1555-8
pubmed: 27236699
Plant Cell Rep. 2018 Apr;37(4):575-586
pubmed: 29332168
BMC Biol. 2018 Mar 19;16(1):32
pubmed: 29554913
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Aug;39(14):6315-25
pubmed: 21459844
Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):921-931
pubmed: 28057894
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 07;19(12):
pubmed: 30544514
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):243-52
pubmed: 26479970
Plant J. 2010 Oct;64(2):355-65
pubmed: 20735773
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):823-6
pubmed: 23287722
Plant J. 2018 May;94(4):735-746
pubmed: 29573495
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov 29;14:327
pubmed: 25432517
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):819-23
pubmed: 23287718
Plant Mol Biol. 2018 Mar;96(4-5):445-456
pubmed: 29476306
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Feb;14(2):519-32
pubmed: 26360626
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3570-5
pubmed: 25733849
Plant Physiol. 2015 Oct;169(2):931-45
pubmed: 26269544
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):46-56
pubmed: 27856772
Plant J. 2014 Jul;79(2):348-59
pubmed: 24836556
Mol Plant. 2015 Dec 7;8(12):1820-3
pubmed: 26524930