Best Practices in Letters of Recommendation for General Surgery Residency: Results of Expert Stakeholder Focus Groups.

Coded language General surgery Letter of recommendation Performance inflation Residency Standardized letter of recommendation

Journal

Journal of surgical education
ISSN: 1878-7452
Titre abrégé: J Surg Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101303204

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 07 04 2020
revised: 03 06 2020
accepted: 28 06 2020
pubmed: 12 7 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 12 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Performance inflation is rampant in applications to general surgery residency. The medical student performance evaluation, transcript, and letters of recommendation (LOR) have all been shown significantly biased in the applicants' favor. This study sought to determine best practices for LOR to improve transparency and alignment of applicant and program characteristics. Two 1-hour focus groups were conducted using semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to discuss the value and role of LOR characteristics, including standardized LOR, and provide recommendations for best practices. The transcribed discussions were coded by two educators using grounded theory and an inductive approach utilizing NVivo 12. Codes were then reviewed and revised to achieve consensus and recommendations. Focus groups were held during the annual Surgical Education Week meeting in April 2019. General Surgery Program Directors from 10 institutions and Surgery Clerkship Directors from 11 other medical schools participated, with each group meeting independently from the other. Individually, 18 codes were identified by the authors, with consensus agreed on ten. These were grouped into 4 themes: author factors, letter content, bias, and standardized letters. Overall, a checkbox and short-answer standardized LOR was not recommended, favoring a template of items to include and exclude. Ideal letter writers were felt to be surgeons who best know the applicant, and the Chair's letter, when they have no working knowledge of the applicant, was perceived to add little value. Use of specific examples to demonstrate applicant characteristics were favored, and descriptors for coded language should be included to aid in interpretation. The focus groups identified best practices to guide writing LOR in support of applicants to general surgery residency. A template of content is provided to improve the efficiency, transparency, and accuracy of these letters for the benefit of students, medical schools, and residency programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32651119
pii: S1931-7204(20)30229-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.036
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e121-e131

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest All authors declare they have no competing interests.

Auteurs

Robert Naples (R)

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: naplesr2@ccf.org.

Judith C French (JC)

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Jeremy M Lipman (JM)

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH