Bleaching correction for DNA measurements in highly diluted solutions using confocal microscopy.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 02 04 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
entrez: 24 7 2020
pubmed: 24 7 2020
medline: 9 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Determining the concentration of nucleic acids in biological samples precisely and reliably still is a challenge. In particular when only very small sample quantities are available for analysis, the established fluorescence-based methods give insufficient results. Photobleaching is seen as the main reason for this. In this paper we present a method to correct for the photobleaching effect. Using confocal microscopy with single molecule sensitivity, we derived calibration curves from DNA solutions with defined fragment length. We analyzed dilution series over a wide range of concentrations (1 pg/μl-1000 pg/μl) and measured their specific diffusion coefficients employing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Using this information, we corrected the measured fluorescence intensity of the calibration solutions for photobleaching effects. We evaluated our method by analyzing a series of DNA mixtures of varying composition. For fragments smaller than 1000 bp, our method allows to determine sample concentrations with high precision in very small sample quantities (< 2 μl with concentrations < 20 pg/μl). Once the technical parameters are determined and remain stable in an established process, our improved calibration method will make measuring molecular biological samples of unknown sequence composition more efficient, accurate and sample-saving than previous methods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32702012
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231918
pii: PONE-D-20-09438
pmc: PMC7377397
doi:

Substances chimiques

Solutions 0
DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0231918

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Opt Express. 2015 Dec 14;23(25):32387-400
pubmed: 26699028
Electrophoresis. 2001 Aug;22(12):2424-32
pubmed: 11519946
J Fluoresc. 2012 Jul;22(4):1189-99
pubmed: 22534954
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
Biophys J. 2010 Nov 3;99(9):3010-9
pubmed: 21044599
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 06;6:24067
pubmed: 27048884
J Biol Eng. 2015 Jan 19;9:2
pubmed: 25745516
J Histochem Cytochem. 2002 Aug;50(8):1005-11
pubmed: 12133903
J Biotechnol. 2006 May 29;123(3):273-80
pubmed: 16388869
J Mol Diagn. 2008 May;10(3):203-11
pubmed: 18403610
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 9;103(19):7310-4
pubmed: 16648255
Biophys J. 2008 Feb 15;94(4):1437-48
pubmed: 17933881
Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2588-600
pubmed: 7647262

Auteurs

Lorenz Tim Sparrenberg (LT)

Institute of Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Information Technology FIT, Sankt Augustin, Germany.

Benjamin Greiner (B)

Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Information Technology FIT, Sankt Augustin, Germany.

Harald Peter Mathis (HP)

Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Information Technology FIT, Sankt Augustin, Germany.

Articles similaires

DNA Methylation Humans DNA Animals Machine Learning
DNA Glycosylases Nucleosomes Humans 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine DNA Repair
Perylene Dopamine Electrochemical Techniques Imides Luminescent Measurements
Alleles Benchmarking Transcription Factors Humans Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

Classifications MeSH