Identification and functional analysis of fourteen NR5A1 variants in patients with the 46 XY disorders of sex development.
46,XY DSD
Disorders of sex development
NR5A1
SF1
Journal
Gene
ISSN: 1879-0038
Titre abrégé: Gene
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7706761
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2020
15 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
17
02
2020
revised:
21
06
2020
accepted:
25
07
2020
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Human sex determination and differentiation is a complex process, during which NR5A1 plays a central role via the transcriptional regulation of key modulators involved in steroidogenesis. Approximately 8-15% of 46,XY DSD are caused by variants in the NR5A1 gene. Therefore, screening for variants in the NR5A1 gene was performed in a Chinese cohort of sixty-two 46,XY DSD patients with no AR or SRD5A2 variants via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Fourteen variants in the NR5A1 gene were identified in 16 patients from 14 unrelated families, including nine novel variants. These variants included eight heterozygote missense variants, two heterozygote frameshift variants, two heterozygote nonsense variants, one heterozygote nonframeshift deletion-insertion variant, and one homozygous missense variant. Functional assays showed that the transcriptional activity of the 11 variants was significantly reduced. In this study, 11 NR5A1 pathogenic variants were identified. These novel variants further expand the existing spectrum of the NR5A1 variants associated with 46,XY DSD, which will, in turn, assist in the molecular diagnosis of DSD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32738419
pii: S0378-1119(20)30673-9
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.145004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
NR5A1 protein, human
0
Steroidogenic Factor 1
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145004Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.