Effect of phosphorus supply on root traits of two Brassica oleracea L. genotypes.
Broccoli
Gene expression
Kale
Phosphorus deficiency
Phosphorus use efficiency
RNAseq
Root exudates
Spatial distribution of phosphorus
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2020
05 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
14
08
2019
accepted:
19
07
2020
entrez:
8
8
2020
pubmed:
8
8
2020
medline:
10
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Phosphorus (P) deficiency limits crop production worldwide. Crops differ in their ability to acquire and utilise the P available. The aim of this study was to determine root traits (root exudates, root system architecture (RSA), tissue-specific allocation of P, and gene expression in roots) that (a) play a role in P-use efficiency and (b) contribute to large shoot zinc (Zn) concentration in Brassica oleracea. Two B. oleracea accessions (var. sabellica C6, a kale, and var. italica F103, a broccoli) were grown in a hydroponic system or in a high-throughput-root phenotyping (HTRP) system where they received Low P (0.025 mM) or High P (0.25 mM) supply for 2 weeks. In hydroponics, root and shoot P and Zn concentrations were measured, root exudates were profiled using both Fourier-Transform-Infrared spectroscopy and gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry and previously published RNAseq data from roots was re-examined. In HTRP experiments, RSA (main and lateral root number and lateral root length) was assessed and the tissue-specific distribution of P was determined using micro-particle-induced-X-ray emission. The C6 accession had greater root and shoot biomass than the F103 accession, but the latter had a larger shoot P concentration than the C6 accession, regardless of the P supply in the hydroponic system. The F103 accession had a larger shoot Zn concentration than the C6 accession in the High P treatment. Although the F103 accession had a larger number of lateral roots, which were also longer than in the C6 accession, the C6 accession released a larger quantity and number of polar compounds than the F103 accession. A larger number of P-responsive genes were found in the Low P treatment in roots of the F103 accession than in roots of the C6 accession. Expression of genes linked with "phosphate starvation" was up-regulated, while those linked with iron homeostasis were down-regulated in the Low P treatment. The results illustrate large within-species variability in root acclimatory responses to P supply in the composition of root exudates, RSA and gene expression, but not in P distribution in root cross sections, enabling P sufficiency in the two B. oleracea accessions studied.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Phosphorus (P) deficiency limits crop production worldwide. Crops differ in their ability to acquire and utilise the P available. The aim of this study was to determine root traits (root exudates, root system architecture (RSA), tissue-specific allocation of P, and gene expression in roots) that (a) play a role in P-use efficiency and (b) contribute to large shoot zinc (Zn) concentration in Brassica oleracea.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two B. oleracea accessions (var. sabellica C6, a kale, and var. italica F103, a broccoli) were grown in a hydroponic system or in a high-throughput-root phenotyping (HTRP) system where they received Low P (0.025 mM) or High P (0.25 mM) supply for 2 weeks. In hydroponics, root and shoot P and Zn concentrations were measured, root exudates were profiled using both Fourier-Transform-Infrared spectroscopy and gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry and previously published RNAseq data from roots was re-examined. In HTRP experiments, RSA (main and lateral root number and lateral root length) was assessed and the tissue-specific distribution of P was determined using micro-particle-induced-X-ray emission. The C6 accession had greater root and shoot biomass than the F103 accession, but the latter had a larger shoot P concentration than the C6 accession, regardless of the P supply in the hydroponic system. The F103 accession had a larger shoot Zn concentration than the C6 accession in the High P treatment. Although the F103 accession had a larger number of lateral roots, which were also longer than in the C6 accession, the C6 accession released a larger quantity and number of polar compounds than the F103 accession. A larger number of P-responsive genes were found in the Low P treatment in roots of the F103 accession than in roots of the C6 accession. Expression of genes linked with "phosphate starvation" was up-regulated, while those linked with iron homeostasis were down-regulated in the Low P treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results illustrate large within-species variability in root acclimatory responses to P supply in the composition of root exudates, RSA and gene expression, but not in P distribution in root cross sections, enabling P sufficiency in the two B. oleracea accessions studied.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32758143
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02558-2
pii: 10.1186/s12870-020-02558-2
pmc: PMC7404929
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
368Subventions
Organisme : Slovenian Research Agency
ID : P1-0212
Organisme : Slovenian Research Agency
ID : P1-0112
Organisme : Slovenian Research Agency
ID : N7-0077
Organisme : Slovenian Research Agency
ID : J7-9398
Organisme : Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship
ID : 623305
Organisme : Mexican National Council for Science and Technology
ID : 177448
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e102444
pubmed: 25058345
Plant Physiol. 2012 Jul;159(3):1149-58
pubmed: 22635118
New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(2):306-20
pubmed: 22691045
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(2):882-895
pubmed: 30932187
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):7652-7662
pubmed: 29722538
Physiol Plant. 2018 Feb 7;:
pubmed: 29412473
New Phytol. 2009;182(1):49-84
pubmed: 19192191
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;44(21):8108-13
pubmed: 20936818
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 28;6:290
pubmed: 25972885
Prog Lipid Res. 2013 Jan;52(1):43-50
pubmed: 22954597
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11934-9
pubmed: 16085708
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2018 Oct 5;203:48-55
pubmed: 29859492
New Phytol. 2018 Mar;217(4):1420-1427
pubmed: 29292829
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Feb 11;5:27
pubmed: 24575103
Ann Bot. 2016 Oct 1;118(4):655-665
pubmed: 27052342
Ann Bot. 2010 Jun;105(7):1081-102
pubmed: 20410048
Biochimie. 2006 Nov;88(11):1767-71
pubmed: 16757083
J Integr Plant Biol. 2009 Nov;51(11):1008-23
pubmed: 19903223
Nature. 2017 Mar 23;543(7646):513-518
pubmed: 28297714
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):207-22
pubmed: 23821619
J Exp Bot. 2015 Oct;66(20):6483-95
pubmed: 26188206
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Nov 23;9:1662
pubmed: 30559748
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jun;66(12):3523-40
pubmed: 25944926
Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Feb;19(2):90-8
pubmed: 24332225
Metallomics. 2017 Jul 19;9(7):813-823
pubmed: 28686269
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 09;10:1645
pubmed: 31998335
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Jun;12(3):381-6
pubmed: 19481970
Plant Physiol. 2006 Oct;142(2):750-61
pubmed: 16891548
Physiol Plant. 2019 Aug;166(4):996-1007
pubmed: 30515843
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jan;23(1):25-41
pubmed: 29050989
New Phytol. 2006;172(2):305-18
pubmed: 16995918
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Nov 12;56(21):10280-91
pubmed: 18937493
Planta. 2009 Mar;229(4):945-54
pubmed: 19148675
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 01;6:29033
pubmed: 27363486
Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Aug;16(8):442-50
pubmed: 21684794
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 12;9(1):1409
pubmed: 29651114
Metallomics. 2012 Apr;4(4):333-41
pubmed: 22370692
Ann Bot. 2010 Jun;105(7):1073-80
pubmed: 20430785
New Phytol. 2007;173(1):181-90
pubmed: 17176404
Plant Cell Rep. 2014 Jun;33(6):919-28
pubmed: 24493254
Glob Food Sec. 2017 Mar;12:49-58
pubmed: 28580239
Plant Physiol. 2007 Dec;145(4):1460-70
pubmed: 17932308
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):391-408
pubmed: 23267006
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):691-703
pubmed: 29118249
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 07;7:1664
pubmed: 27872635
New Phytol. 2012 Oct;196(1):101-9
pubmed: 22803633
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(2):548-564
pubmed: 30746704
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Aug 08;13:114
pubmed: 23924433
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):331-45
pubmed: 23071218
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jul;156(3):1041-9
pubmed: 21610180
Chemosphere. 2017 May;175:356-364
pubmed: 28235745
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(7):1953-68
pubmed: 19346243
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 16;9(1):2738
pubmed: 30013066
Database (Oxford). 2011 Jul 23;2011:bar030
pubmed: 21785142
Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):1181-91
pubmed: 18467463
Ann Bot. 2016 Aug;118(2):173-84
pubmed: 27279575
Plant Methods. 2019 Mar 23;15:29
pubmed: 30949230