MGMT promoter methylation in triple negative breast cancer of the GeparSixto trial.
Biopsy
Clinical Trials as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Cohort Studies
CpG Islands
/ genetics
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
Humans
Promoter Regions, Genetic
/ genetics
Retrospective Studies
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Survival Analysis
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ genetics
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
05
2020
accepted:
06
08
2020
entrez:
26
8
2020
pubmed:
26
8
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is typically treated with chemotherapeutic agents, including carboplatin (Cb), an DNA platinating agent. The O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase gene (MGMT) encodes for the protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (MGMT protein). MGMT protein is involved in DNA repair mechanisms to remove mutagenic and cytotoxic adducts from O6-guanine in DNA. In glioblastoma multiforme, MGMT methylation status is a predictive biomarker for increased response to temozolomide therapy. It has been suggested, that MGMT protein may have relevance for cellular adaptation and could have an influence on resistance to carboplatin therapy. We investigated the influence of MGMT promoter methylation on pathologic complete response and survival of patients with TNBC treated in the neoadjuvant GeparSixto trial. In 174 of 210 available TNBC tumors a valid MGMT promoter methylation status was determined by pyrosequencing of 5 CpG islands. In 21.8%, we detected a mean MGMT promoter methylation >10%. Overall, MGMT promoter methylation was not significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) rate. After stratification for the two therapy arms with and without Cb no statistically significant differences in therapy response rates between the two MGMT promoter methylation groups could be observed. Our results show that different MGMT promoter methylation status is not related to different chemotherapy response rates in the TNBC setting in GeparSixto.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32841306
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238021
pii: PONE-D-20-14209
pmc: PMC7446962
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0238021Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Schneeweiss reports grants from Celgene, grants from Roche, grants from AbbVie, grants from Molecular Partner, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Tesaro, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Pfizer, other from Roche, outside the submitted work. Dr. v. Mackelenbergh reports travel grants and honoria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gebomic Health, Novartis, Lilly. Dr. Denkert reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from MSD Oncology, from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Myriad Genetics, other from Sividon Diagnostics / Myriad, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Denkert has a patent EP18209672 pending, a patent EP20150702464 pending, and a patent Software (VMscope digital pathology) pending. All other authors declare no conflict of interest. We confirm that the patents do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. We would like to point out, that the patents had been added as general COI information but are not related to MGMT methylation.
Références
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12 Suppl 2:S3
pubmed: 21050424
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(6):2430-2440
pubmed: 28848211
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1444-1453
pubmed: 31488360
Gene. 2018 Feb 20;644:66-73
pubmed: 29080834
Int J Cancer. 1995 May 4;61(3):321-6
pubmed: 7729942
Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Apr;4(4):296-307
pubmed: 15057289
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jul;134(1):131-7
pubmed: 22228432
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019 Jun 5;7(1):89
pubmed: 31167648
Cell. 2007 Feb 23;128(4):683-92
pubmed: 17320506
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;6(8):1100-15
pubmed: 17485252
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;6(8):1155-60
pubmed: 17482895
Am J Pathol. 2002 Sep;161(3):1015-22
pubmed: 12213730
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 14;17:125
pubmed: 26370119
Oncol Rev. 2017 Mar 17;11(1):324
pubmed: 28382189
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Feb;73(2):112-115
pubmed: 31422371
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):68662-68673
pubmed: 27626685
Mol Carcinog. 1999 Feb;24(2):90-8
pubmed: 10078936
Plant Cell. 2002 Jan;14(1):263-73
pubmed: 11826311
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 26;11:35
pubmed: 21269507
Hum Genet. 2014 Jun;133(6):713-25
pubmed: 24104525
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Aug;14(4):285-90
pubmed: 24709436
Oncotarget. 2018 Jul 3;9(51):29727-29742
pubmed: 30038716
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006 Aug;6(4):355-63
pubmed: 16777483
Anal Biochem. 2008 Dec 1;383(1):44-51
pubmed: 18783719
J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 25;255(22):10569-71
pubmed: 7000780
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 13;358(11):1148-59
pubmed: 18337604
Lab Invest. 2008 Dec;88(12):1367-75
pubmed: 18936738
Oncol Lett. 2014 Jun;7(6):1778-1784
pubmed: 24932232
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39(6):2186-2202
pubmed: 27802440
Tumour Biol. 2015 Aug;36(8):6485-96
pubmed: 25820821
Biochemistry. 1996 Jan 30;35(4):1328-34
pubmed: 8573590
Oncol Rep. 2012 May;27(5):1630-8
pubmed: 22159596