Investigating the presence of compensatory evolution in dicamba resistant IAA16 mutated kochia (Bassia scoparia)

compensatory evolution dicamba resistance kochia (Bassia scoparia) reproductive allocation seed dispersal stigma-anther distance

Journal

Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised: 02 11 2020
received: 05 05 2020
accepted: 24 11 2020
pubmed: 26 11 2020
medline: 18 3 2021
entrez: 25 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lack of fitness costs has been reported for multiple herbicide resistance traits, but the underlying evolutionary mechanisms are not well understood. Compensatory evolution that ameliorates resistance costs, has been documented in bacteria and insects but rarely studied in weeds. Dicamba resistant IAA16 (G73N) mutated kochia was previously found to have high fecundity in the absence of competition, regardless of significant vegetative growth defects. To understand if costs of dicamba resistance can be compensated through traits promoting reproductive success in kochia, we thoroughly characterized the reproductive growth and development of different G73N kochia biotypes. Flowering phenology, seed production and reproductive allocation were quantified through greenhouse studies, floral (stigma-anthers distance) and seed morphology, as well as resulting mating and seed dispersal systems were studied through time-course microcopy images. G73N covaried with multiple phenological, morphological and ecological traits that improve reproductive fitness: (i) 16-60% higher reproductive allocation; (ii) longer reproduction phase through early flowering (2-7 days); (iii) smaller stigma-anthers separation (up to 60% reduction of herkogamy and dichogamy) that can potentially promote selfing and reproductive assurance; (iv) 'winged' seeds with 30-70% longer sepals that facilitate long-distance seed dispersal. The current study demonstrates that costs of herbicide resistance can be ameliorated through coevolution of other fitness penalty alleviating traits. As illustrated in a hypothetical model, the evolution of herbicide resistance is an ongoing fitness maximization process, which poses challenges to contain the spread of resistance. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lack of fitness costs has been reported for multiple herbicide resistance traits, but the underlying evolutionary mechanisms are not well understood. Compensatory evolution that ameliorates resistance costs, has been documented in bacteria and insects but rarely studied in weeds. Dicamba resistant IAA16 (G73N) mutated kochia was previously found to have high fecundity in the absence of competition, regardless of significant vegetative growth defects. To understand if costs of dicamba resistance can be compensated through traits promoting reproductive success in kochia, we thoroughly characterized the reproductive growth and development of different G73N kochia biotypes. Flowering phenology, seed production and reproductive allocation were quantified through greenhouse studies, floral (stigma-anthers distance) and seed morphology, as well as resulting mating and seed dispersal systems were studied through time-course microcopy images.
RESULTS RESULTS
G73N covaried with multiple phenological, morphological and ecological traits that improve reproductive fitness: (i) 16-60% higher reproductive allocation; (ii) longer reproduction phase through early flowering (2-7 days); (iii) smaller stigma-anthers separation (up to 60% reduction of herkogamy and dichogamy) that can potentially promote selfing and reproductive assurance; (iv) 'winged' seeds with 30-70% longer sepals that facilitate long-distance seed dispersal.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The current study demonstrates that costs of herbicide resistance can be ameliorated through coevolution of other fitness penalty alleviating traits. As illustrated in a hypothetical model, the evolution of herbicide resistance is an ongoing fitness maximization process, which poses challenges to contain the spread of resistance. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33236492
doi: 10.1002/ps.6198
pmc: PMC7986355
doi:

Substances chimiques

Herbicides 0
Dicamba SJG3M6RY6H

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1775-1785

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Références

Evolution. 1998 Apr;52(2):443-453
pubmed: 28568346
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Jun;21:39-46
pubmed: 28822487
Ann Bot. 2013 Apr;111(4):651-61
pubmed: 23408833
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8757-62
pubmed: 16723400
Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov 07;5(23):5521-38
pubmed: 27069603
J Exp Bot. 2016 May;67(11):3223-35
pubmed: 26994475
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2306-2315
pubmed: 29083527
Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):54-70
pubmed: 28568860
Genetics. 2000 Feb;154(2):923-9
pubmed: 10655241
Plant Cell. 2007 Aug;19(8):2430-9
pubmed: 17704214
Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Nov;65(11):1164-73
pubmed: 19743401
Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):213-20
pubmed: 17246476
Genetics. 2008 Oct;180(2):845-56
pubmed: 18780736
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Apr;8(4):260-71
pubmed: 20208551
Plant Mol Biol. 2013 May;82(1-2):71-83
pubmed: 23483289
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 03;8:94
pubmed: 28217132
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 2;116(27):13299-13304
pubmed: 31209034
Evolution. 2002 Apr;56(4):768-75
pubmed: 12038534
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Sep;15(9):378-383
pubmed: 10931680
BMC Biotechnol. 2015 Apr 26;15:27
pubmed: 25928331
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Aug;57(8):3752-62
pubmed: 23716056
New Phytol. 2009 Dec;184(4):783-93
pubmed: 19780985
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Dec;101(6):499-506
pubmed: 18766202
Genes Dev. 2006 Jul 1;20(13):1790-9
pubmed: 16818609
J Integr Plant Biol. 2011 Jun;53(6):480-92
pubmed: 21564544
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(2):532-547
pubmed: 30737790
Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Jun-Jul;49(3-4):387-400
pubmed: 12036262
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec;31(12):940-952
pubmed: 27743611
Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Sep;6(9):420-5
pubmed: 11544131
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 May;74(5):1134-1142
pubmed: 27766747
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Feb;74(2):293-301
pubmed: 28834134
Oecologia. 1993 Mar;93(3):336-342
pubmed: 28313432
Evolution. 2015 Jan;69(1):271-8
pubmed: 25255698
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018 Apr 29;69:611-635
pubmed: 29140727
New Phytol. 2009 Dec;184(4):751-67
pubmed: 19825013
Mol Plant. 2014 Aug;7(8):1267-1287
pubmed: 24777989
New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(2):679-88
pubmed: 23905647
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Feb;77(2):795-804
pubmed: 32909332
Evolution. 1990 Aug;44(5):1129-1139
pubmed: 28563899
Science. 2009 Jun 12;324(5933):1438-40
pubmed: 19520959
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161533
pubmed: 27537419
Plant Cell. 2017 Apr;29(4):666-680
pubmed: 28320784
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jan;20(1):41-49
pubmed: 27905176
Res Microbiol. 2004 Jun;155(5):360-9
pubmed: 15207868
New Phytol. 2006;169(2):251-64
pubmed: 16411929
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009 Dec;1(6):a001628
pubmed: 20457563
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 27;115(13):E2911-E2920
pubmed: 29531066
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(2):653-658
pubmed: 31403702
Phys Rev E. 2019 Jul;100(1-1):013108
pubmed: 31499848
Science. 2007 May 25;316(5828):1185-8
pubmed: 17525337
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 16;19(1):
pubmed: 29337875
Plant Cell. 2005 Dec;17(12):3282-300
pubmed: 16284307
Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Feb;66(2):113-20
pubmed: 19823992
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 13;9(1):16695
pubmed: 31723191
Evolution. 2005 May;59(5):1143-8
pubmed: 16136811
Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Jan;51(1):164-75
pubmed: 20007966
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13386-90
pubmed: 15326309
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57902
pubmed: 23469099
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):68-82
pubmed: 30710343
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):991-1004
pubmed: 12831464
Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Jul;79(4-5):359-73
pubmed: 22580954
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jul 22;19(7):
pubmed: 30037141
Evolution. 1988 May;42(3):433-440
pubmed: 28564011
Ann Bot. 2012 Feb;109(3):571-82
pubmed: 21980191

Auteurs

Chenxi Wu (C)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Bayer CropScience, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Marta Paciorek (M)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Bayer CropScience, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Kang Liu (K)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Bayer CropScience, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Sherry LeClere (S)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Bayer CropScience, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Alejandro Perez-Jones (A)

Department of Plant Biotechnology, Bayer CropScience, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Phil Westra (P)

Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

R Douglas Sammons (RD)

Sammons BFC LLC, Wentzville, MO, USA.

Articles similaires

Glycine max Photoperiod Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Flowers Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
1.00
Humans 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Male Prostatic Neoplasms Middle Aged
Siderophores Herbicides Plant Weeds Lolium Actinobacteria

Classifications MeSH