The administration of antisense oligonucleotide golodirsen reduces pathological regeneration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Biopsy
Child
Dystroglycans
/ metabolism
Dystrophin
/ genetics
Humans
Laminin
/ metabolism
Male
Muscle, Skeletal
/ metabolism
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
/ metabolism
Myosins
/ metabolism
Oligonucleotides
/ therapeutic use
Oligonucleotides, Antisense
/ therapeutic use
Regeneration
Sarcoglycans
/ metabolism
Sarcolemma
/ metabolism
Treatment Outcome
Clinical trial
Dystrophin
Genetic therapies
Golodirsen
Immunofluorescence
Muscular dystrophy
Journal
Acta neuropathologica communications
ISSN: 2051-5960
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 01 2021
06 01 2021
Historique:
received:
11
12
2020
accepted:
13
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the last decade, multiple clinical trials for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) have focused on the induction of dystrophin expression using different strategies. Many of these trials have reported a clear increase in dystrophin protein following treatment. However, the low levels of the induced dystrophin protein have raised questions on its functionality. In our present study, using an unbiased, high-throughput digital image analysis platform, we assessed markers of regeneration and levels of dystrophin associated protein via immunofluorescent analysis of whole muscle sections in 25 DMD boys who received 48-weeks treatment with exon 53 skipping morpholino antisense oligonucleotide (PMO) golodirsen. We demonstrate that the de novo dystrophin induced by exon skipping with PMO golodirsen is capable of conferring a histological benefit in treated patients with an increase in dystrophin associated proteins at the dystrophin positive regions of the sarcolemma in post-treatment biopsies. Although 48 weeks treatment with golodirsen did not result in a significant change in the levels of fetal/developmental myosins for the entire cohort, there was a significant negative correlation between the amount of dystrophin and levels of regeneration observed in different biopsy samples. Our results provide, for the first time, evidence of functionality of induced dystrophin following successful therapeutic intervention in the human.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407808
doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01106-1
pii: 10.1186/s40478-020-01106-1
pmc: PMC7789286
doi:
Substances chimiques
DAG1 protein, human
0
Dystrophin
0
Laminin
0
Oligonucleotides
0
Oligonucleotides, Antisense
0
Sarcoglycans
0
laminin alpha 2
0
golodirsen
033072U4MZ
Dystroglycans
146888-27-9
Myosins
EC 3.6.4.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : Cl 15121 A20256
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017 Dec 15;9:409-418
pubmed: 29246319
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Aug;51(8):759-64
pubmed: 25752877
Skelet Muscle. 2015 Jul 15;5:22
pubmed: 26180627
Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Oct;45(4):498-506
pubmed: 2491009
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:210797
pubmed: 22007139
Hum Mutat. 2009 Mar;30(3):293-9
pubmed: 19156838
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Jan;71(1):32-40
pubmed: 24217213
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018 Dec 7;13:442-449
pubmed: 30388618
Am J Pathol. 2008 May;172(5):1332-41
pubmed: 18385524
J Biol Chem. 2003 Apr 18;278(16):13591-4
pubmed: 12556452
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Jun 15;13(1):93
pubmed: 29907124
Molecules. 2017 Apr 05;22(4):
pubmed: 28379182
Brain. 2011 Dec;134(Pt 12):3547-59
pubmed: 22102647
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):982-991
pubmed: 32453377
Neurology. 2018 Jun 12;90(24):e2146-e2154
pubmed: 29752304
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19750
pubmed: 26813695
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):578-593
pubmed: 31849191
Mol Ther. 2004 Nov;10(5):821-8
pubmed: 15509500
FASEB J. 2013 Jun;27(6):2484-95
pubmed: 23460734
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):C651-8
pubmed: 18171725
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31937
pubmed: 22359642
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):595-605
pubmed: 21784508
Compr Physiol. 2015 Jul 1;5(3):1223-39
pubmed: 26140716
Mol Ther. 2011 Feb;19(2):345-54
pubmed: 21102560
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e81302
pubmed: 24349052
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 May;137(5):1334-46
pubmed: 27155029
Neurology. 2016 Jul 26;87(4):401-9
pubmed: 27343068
Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):919-28
pubmed: 3319190
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020 Apr 17;8(1):53
pubmed: 32303261
Mol Ther. 2011 Jan;19(1):165-71
pubmed: 20924363
Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):304-13
pubmed: 22451200
Neurol Clin. 2014 Aug;32(3):671-88, viii
pubmed: 25037084
Neural Regen Res. 2019 Aug;14(8):1317-1320
pubmed: 30964048
Ann Neurol. 2013 Nov;74(5):637-47
pubmed: 23907995
Mol Ther. 2018 Oct 3;26(10):2337-2356
pubmed: 30093306
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;87(2):149-55
pubmed: 25733532
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0150818
pubmed: 26974331
Neuromuscul Disord. 2007 Dec;17(11-12):913-8
pubmed: 17826093
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 25;14(6):e0218683
pubmed: 31237898
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13714-9
pubmed: 11095710
Stem Cell Res. 2018 Jul;30:43-52
pubmed: 29783100
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Feb;1838(2):635-42
pubmed: 24021238
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017 Oct;27(5):251-259
pubmed: 28796573
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Jan 15;28(2):307-319
pubmed: 30304405
Mol Ther. 2012 Feb;20(2):462-7
pubmed: 22086232
Neurology. 2020 May 26;94(21):e2270-e2282
pubmed: 32139505