Testing active membranes for bone regeneration: A review.

Bone regeneration Macrophages Membrane Osteoblasts Osteoimmunomodulation

Journal

Journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1879-176X
Titre abrégé: J Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0354422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 11 11 2020
revised: 30 12 2020
accepted: 31 12 2020
pubmed: 9 1 2021
medline: 24 4 2021
entrez: 8 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Maxillofacial bone defects are the main hindering conditions for traditional dental implant strategies. Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is used to handle this situation. The principle of GBR is to use a membrane to prevent the colonization of soft tissue cells of the bone defect and favors the migration of osteogenic linages. Current membranes do not completely fulfill the requirements that an optimal membrane should have, sometimes resulting in non-predictable results. Thus, the need to develop an ideal membrane to perform this duty is clear. Recent developments in bio-manufacturing are driving innovations in membranes technology permitting the active participation of the membrane in the healing and regenerative process trough native tissue mimicking, drug-delivery and cells interaction, away from being a passive barrier. New membranes features need specific evaluation techniques, beyond the International Standard for membrane materials (last reviewed in 2004), being this the rationale for the present review. Nanotechnology application has completely shifted the way of analyzing structural characterization. New progresses on osteoimmmunomodulation have also switched the understanding of cells-membranes interaction. To propose an updated protocol for GBR membranes evaluation, critical reading of the relevant published literature was carried out after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. The main findings are that a potential active membrane should be assessed in its nanostructure, physicochemical and nanomechanical properties, bioactivity and antibacterial, osteoblasts proliferation, differentiation and mineralization. Immunomodulation testing for macrophages recruitment and M2 phenotype promotion in osteoblasts co-culture has to be achieved to completely analyze membranes/tissue interactions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33417978
pii: S0300-5712(21)00001-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103580
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Membranes, Artificial 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103580

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Manuel Toledano-Osorio (M)

Biomaterials in Dentistry Research Group, Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain; Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública PhD Programme, Spain.

Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno (FJ)

Biomedical Group (BIO277), Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain; Instituto Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain.

Concepción Ruiz (C)

Instituto Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain; Biomedical Group (BIO277), Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience, University of Granada, Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CIBM), Parque Tecnológico de la Salud (PTS), Granada, Spain.

Manuel Toledano (M)

Biomaterials in Dentistry Research Group, Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain. Electronic address: toledano@ugr.es.

Raquel Osorio (R)

Biomaterials in Dentistry Research Group, Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain.

Articles similaires

Animals Osteogenesis Osteoporosis Mesenchymal Stem Cells Humans
Organoids Animals Kidney Mice Humans

Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.

Ana Beatriz G de Carvalho, Maedeh Rahimnejad, Rodrigo L M S Oliveira et al.
1.00
Humans Bone Regeneration Ceramics Printing, Three-Dimensional Tissue Scaffolds
Animals Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Calcium Phosphates Rats Retrospective Studies

Classifications MeSH