Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.


Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 18 11 2020
accepted: 14 12 2020
entrez: 3 2 2021
pubmed: 4 2 2021
medline: 16 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of remote online delivery of summative assessments has been underexplored in medical education. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all end of year applied knowledge multiple choice question (MCQ) tests at one UK medical school were switched from on campus to remote assessments. We conducted an online survey of student experience with remote exam delivery and compared test performance in remote versus invigilated campus-based forms of similar assessments for Year 4 and 5 students across two academic years. Very few students experienced technical or practical problems in completing their exam remotely. Test anxiety was reduced for some students but increased for others. The majority of students preferred the traditional setting of invigilated exams in a computer lab, feeling this ensured an even playing field for all candidates. Mean score was higher for Year 4 students in the remotely-delivered versus campus-based form of the same exam (76.53% [SD 6.57] vs. 72.81% [6.64]; t Remote online MCQ exam delivery is an effective and generally acceptable approach to summative assessment, and could be used again in future without detriment to students if onsite delivery is not possible.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of remote online delivery of summative assessments has been underexplored in medical education. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all end of year applied knowledge multiple choice question (MCQ) tests at one UK medical school were switched from on campus to remote assessments.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted an online survey of student experience with remote exam delivery and compared test performance in remote versus invigilated campus-based forms of similar assessments for Year 4 and 5 students across two academic years.
RESULTS RESULTS
Very few students experienced technical or practical problems in completing their exam remotely. Test anxiety was reduced for some students but increased for others. The majority of students preferred the traditional setting of invigilated exams in a computer lab, feeling this ensured an even playing field for all candidates. Mean score was higher for Year 4 students in the remotely-delivered versus campus-based form of the same exam (76.53% [SD 6.57] vs. 72.81% [6.64]; t
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Remote online MCQ exam delivery is an effective and generally acceptable approach to summative assessment, and could be used again in future without detriment to students if onsite delivery is not possible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33530962
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02521-1
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02521-1
pmc: PMC7851803
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

86

Références

Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):781-786
pubmed: 32552191
Med Educ. 2020 Aug;54(8):767-768
pubmed: 32421858
Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):830-831
pubmed: 32432953
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):583-99
pubmed: 26535862
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683

Auteurs

Alan Jaap (A)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. alan.jaap@ed.ac.uk.

Avril Dewar (A)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Colin Duncan (C)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Karen Fairhurst (K)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

David Hope (D)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

David Kluth (D)

Medical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH