Ancient genomes reveal early Andean farmers selected common beans while preserving diversity.

Argentina Crops, Agricultural / genetics Domestication Farmers / psychology Genetic Variation Genome, Plant Genotype History, Ancient Phaseolus / genetics

Journal

Nature plants

ISSN: 2055-0278

Titre abrégé: Nat Plants

Pays: England

ID NLM: 101651677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021

Historique:

received: 19 10 2019

accepted: 04 01 2021

pubmed: 10 2 2021

medline: 28 4 2021

entrez: 9 2 2021

Statut: ppublish

Résumé

All crops are the product of a domestication process that started less than 12,000 years ago from one or more wild populations

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-00848-7 PMID: 33558754

pubmed: 33558754

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00848-7

pii: 10.1038/s41477-021-00848-7

doi:

Types de publication

Historical Article Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

123-128

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Diamond, J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418, 700–707 (2002).

pubmed: 12167878 doi: 10.1038/nature01019

Purugganan, M. D. Evolutionary insights into the nature of plant domestication. Curr. Biol. 29, 705–714 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.053

Meyer, R. S. & Purugganan, M. D. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 840–852 (2013).

pubmed: 24240513 doi: 10.1038/nrg3605

Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S. & Smith, B. D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127, 1309–1321 (2006).

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006 pubmed: 17190597

Van de Wouw, M., Kik, C., van Hintum, T., van Treuren, R. & Visser, B. Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges. Plant Genet. Resour. 8, 1–15 (2010).

doi: 10.1017/S1479262109990062

Babiker, E. M. et al. Mapping resistance to the Ug99 race group of the stem rust pathogen in a spring wheat landrace. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 605–612 (2015).

pubmed: 25599859 doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2456-6

Dale, J. et al. Transgenic Cavendish bananas with resistance to Fusarium wilt tropical race 4. Nat. Commun. 8, 1496 (2017).

pubmed: 29133817 pmcid: 5684404 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01670-6

Esquinas-Alcázar, J. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 946–953 (2005).

pubmed: 16341075 doi: 10.1038/nrg1729

Gepts, P. Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization. Crop Sci. 46, 2278–2292 (2006).

doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0169gas

Beissinger, T. M. et al. Recent demography drives changes in linked selection across the maize genome. Nat. Plants 2, 16084 (2016).

pubmed: 27294617 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.84

Hyten, D. L. et al. Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16666–16671 (2006).

pubmed: 17068128 pmcid: 1624862 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604379103

Fuller, D. Q. et al. Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6147–6152 (2014).

pubmed: 24753577 pmcid: 4035951 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308937110

Khush, G. S. Green revolution: the way forward. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 815–822 (2001).

pubmed: 11584298 doi: 10.1038/35093585

Fu, Y. B. Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 2131–2142 (2015).

pubmed: 26246331 pmcid: 4624815 doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2585-y

Bevan, M. W. et al. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature 543, 346–354 (2017).

pubmed: 28300107 doi: 10.1038/nature22011

Bitocchi, E. et al. Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E788–E796 (2012).

pubmed: 22393017 pmcid: 3325731 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108973109

Schmutz, J. et al. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat. Genet. 46, 707–713 (2014).

pubmed: 24908249 pmcid: 7048698 doi: 10.1038/ng.3008

Bitocchi, E. et al. Beans (Phaseolus ssp.) as a model for understanding crop evolution. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 722 (2017).

pubmed: 28533789 pmcid: 5420584 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00722

Winkel, T. et al. Discontinuities in quinoa biodiversity in the dry Andes: an 18-century perspective based on allelic genotyping. PLoS ONE 13, e0207519 (2018).

pubmed: 30517116 pmcid: 6281180 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207519

Fages, A. et al. Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series. Cell 177, 1419–1435 (2019).

pubmed: 31056281 pmcid: 6547883 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.049

Rendón-Anaya, M. et al. Genomic history of the origin and domestication of common bean unveils its closest sister species. Genome Biol. 18, 60 (2017).

pubmed: 28356141 pmcid: 5370463 doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1190-6

Allaby, R. G., Ware, R. L. & Kistler, L. A re-evaluation of the domestication bottleneck from archaeogenomic evidence. Evol. Appl. 12, 29–37 (2019).

pubmed: 30622633 doi: 10.1111/eva.12680

Castañeda-Álvarez, N. P. et al. Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Nat. Plants 2, 16022 (2016).

pubmed: 27249561 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.22

Pochettino, M. L. & Scattolin, M. C. Identificación y significado de frutos y semillas carbonizados de sitios arqueológicos de la ladera occidental del Aconquija, Prov. Catamarca, Rca. Argentina. Rev. Mus. La Plata, Antropol. 9, 169–181 (1991).

Singh, S. P., Gepts, P. & Debouck, D. G. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 45, 379–396 (1991).

doi: 10.1007/BF02887079

Williams, V. I. Formaciones sociales en el noroeste argentino: variabilidad prehispánica en el surandino durante el Periodo de Desarrollos Regionales y el estado Inca. Rev. Haucaypata 9, 62–76 (2015).

Núñez, L. & Nielsen, A. E. En Ruta: Arquelogía, Historia y Etnografía del Tráfico Surandino (Encuentro Grupo Editor, 2011).

Da Fonseca, R. R. et al. The origin and evolution of maize in the southwestern United States. Nat. Plants 1, 14003 (2015).

pubmed: 27246050 doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.3

Dubos, C. et al. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 573–581 (2010).

pubmed: 20674465 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005

Rau, D. et al. Genomic dissection of pod shattering in common bean: mutations at non‐orthologous loci at the basis of convergent phenotypic evolution under domestication of leguminous species. Plant J. 97, 693–714 (2019).

pubmed: 30422331 doi: 10.1111/tpj.14155

Saitoh, K., Onishi, K., Mikami, I., Thidar, K. & Sano, Y. Allelic diversification at the C (OsC1) locus of wild and cultivated rice: nucleotide changes associated with phenotypes. Genetics 168, 997–1007 (2004).

pubmed: 15514070 pmcid: 1448844 doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.018390

Estrada, O., Breen, J., Richards, S. M. & Cooper, A. Ancient plant DNA in the genomic era. Nat. Plants 4, 394–396 (2018).

pubmed: 29915330 doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0187-9

Brunson, K. & Reich, D. The promise of paleogenomics beyond our own species. Trends Genet. 35, 319–329 (2019).

pubmed: 30954285 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.02.006

Mascher, M. et al. Genomic analysis of 6,000-year-old cultivated grain illuminates the domestication history of barley. Nat. Genet. 48, 1089–1093 (2016).

pubmed: 27428749 doi: 10.1038/ng.3611

Ramos-Madrigal, J. et al. Genome sequence of a 5,310-year-old maize cob provides insights into the early stages of maize domestication. Curr. Biol. 26, 3195–3201 (2016).

pubmed: 27866890 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.036

Wagner, S. et al. High throughput DNA sequencing of ancient wood. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1138–1154 (2018).

pubmed: 29412519 pmcid: 5896730 doi: 10.1111/mec.14514

Kistler, L. et al. Multiproxy evidence highlights a complex evolutionary legacy of maize in South America. Science 362, 1309–1313 (2018).

pubmed: 30545889 doi: 10.1126/science.aav0207

Smith, O. et al. A domestication history of dynamic adaptation and genomic deterioration in sorghum. Nat. Plants 5, 369–379 (2019).

pubmed: 30962527 doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0397-9

Lema, V. Non-domesticated cultivation in the Andes: plant management and nurturing in the Argentine northwest. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 24, 143–150 (2015).

doi: 10.1007/s00334-014-0494-7

Oliszewski, N. & Babot, P. in Avances y Desafíos Metodológicos en Arqueobotánica: Miradas Consensuadas y Diálogos Compartidos desde Sudamérica (eds Belmar, C. & Lema, V.) 301–324 (Facultad de Patrimonio Cultural y Educaciòn Universidad SEK Chile, 2015).

Schubert, M. et al. Characterization of ancient and modern genomes by SNP detection and phylogenomic and metagenomic analysis using PALEOMIX. Nat. Prot. 9, 1056–1082 (2014).

doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.063

Jónsson, H., Ginolhac, A., Schubert, M., Johnson, P. L. & Orlando, L. mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics 29, 1682–1684 (2013).

pubmed: 23613487 pmcid: 3694634 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt193

Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 15, 356 (2014).

doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4

Vieira, F. G., Fumagalli, M., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. Estimating inbreeding coefficients from NGS data: impact on genotype calling and allele frequency estimation. Genome Res. 23, 1852–1861 (2013).

pubmed: 23950147 pmcid: 3814885 doi: 10.1101/gr.157388.113

Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).

pubmed: 19648217 pmcid: 2752134 doi: 10.1101/gr.094052.109

Lawson, D. J., Hellenthal, G., Myers, S. & Falush, D. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002453 (2012).

pubmed: 22291602 pmcid: 3266881 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002453

Slotte, T. The impact of linked selection on plant genomic variation. Brief. Funct. Genomics 13, 268–275 (2014).

pubmed: 24759704 pmcid: 4110415 doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elu009

Renaut, S. & Rieseberg, L. H. The accumulation of deleterious mutations as a consequence of domestication and improvement in sunflowers and other Compositae crops. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2273–2283 (2015).

pubmed: 25939650 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv106