Physical modeling of multivalent interactions in the nuclear pore complex.
Journal
Biophysical journal
ISSN: 1542-0086
Titre abrégé: Biophys J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 05 2021
04 05 2021
Historique:
received:
06
10
2020
revised:
25
01
2021
accepted:
27
01
2021
pubmed:
23
2
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
entrez:
22
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the nuclear pore complex, intrinsically disordered proteins (FG Nups), along with their interactions with more globular proteins called nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), are vital to the selectivity of transport into and out of the cell nucleus. Although such interactions can be modeled at different levels of coarse graining, in vitro experimental data have been quantitatively described by minimal models that describe FG Nups as cohesive homogeneous polymers and NTRs as uniformly cohesive spheres, in which the heterogeneous effects have been smeared out. By definition, these minimal models do not account for the explicit heterogeneities in FG Nup sequences, essentially a string of cohesive and noncohesive polymer units, and at the NTR surface. Here, we develop computational and analytical models that do take into account such heterogeneity in a minimal fashion and compare them with experimental data on single-molecule interactions between FG Nups and NTRs. Overall, we find that the heterogeneous nature of FG Nups and NTRs does play a role in determining equilibrium binding properties but is of much greater significance when it comes to unbinding and binding kinetics. Using our models, we predict how binding equilibria and kinetics depend on the distribution of cohesive blocks in the FG Nup sequences and of the binding pockets at the NTR surface, with multivalency playing a key role. Finally, we observe that single-molecule binding kinetics has a rather minor influence on the diffusion of NTRs in polymer melts consisting of FG-Nup-like sequences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33617830
pii: S0006-3495(21)00156-9
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.039
pmc: PMC8204217
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
0
Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1565-1577Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Structure. 2018 Mar 6;26(3):477-484.e4
pubmed: 29429880
Biophys J. 2019 Apr 2;116(7):1204-1215
pubmed: 30902367
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Jun;85(6 Pt 1):061917
pubmed: 23005137
Phys Rev E. 2020 Feb;101(2-1):022420
pubmed: 32168597
Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):815-7
pubmed: 17082456
FEBS J. 2015 Feb;282(3):445-62
pubmed: 25429850
EMBO J. 2002 Jun 17;21(12):2843-53
pubmed: 12065398
Biophys J. 2005 Mar;88(3):1875-86
pubmed: 15613633
J Cell Biol. 2020 Jan 6;219(1):
pubmed: 31723007
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Aug;68:42-51
pubmed: 28506890
Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1374-7
pubmed: 10827939
J Chem Phys. 2012 Oct 14;137(14):144105
pubmed: 23061837
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 May;11(5):31-46
pubmed: 22357553
J Cell Biol. 2017 Nov 6;216(11):3609-3624
pubmed: 28864541
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 20;103(25):9512-7
pubmed: 16769882
Biophys J. 2007 Jul 1;93(1):316-23
pubmed: 17416631
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):2960-71
pubmed: 16113107
Structure. 2005 Dec;13(12):1869-79
pubmed: 16338415
Soft Matter. 2020 Dec 16;16(47):10628-10639
pubmed: 33084724
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):E2489-97
pubmed: 27091992
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Oct;9(10):2205-24
pubmed: 20368288
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 2;9(1):902
pubmed: 29500415
Biophys J. 2009 May 6;96(9):3840-9
pubmed: 19413990
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Apr;85(4 Pt 1):041924
pubmed: 22680515
Cell. 2015 Oct 22;163(3):734-45
pubmed: 26456112
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):E6342-E6351
pubmed: 28716919
Structure. 2007 Aug;15(8):977-91
pubmed: 17698002
EMBO J. 2001 Mar 15;20(6):1320-30
pubmed: 11250898
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0148876
pubmed: 26894898
Biophys J. 2020 Jan 21;118(2):376-385
pubmed: 31858976
Biophys J. 2017 Jul 11;113(1):6-14
pubmed: 28700925
Elife. 2016 May 20;5:
pubmed: 27198189
Biophys J. 2013 Dec 17;105(12):2781-9
pubmed: 24359750
EMBO Rep. 2010 May;11(5):366-72
pubmed: 20379223
Phys Rev E. 2018 Jul;98(1-1):012403
pubmed: 30110828
J Cell Biol. 2006 Sep 25;174(7):951-61
pubmed: 16982803
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16155-60
pubmed: 22984159
J Phys Chem B. 2020 Aug 6;124(31):6709-6720
pubmed: 32639157
J Comput Chem. 2011 Jul 15;32(9):1919-28
pubmed: 21469160
J Biol Chem. 2018 Mar 23;293(12):4555-4563
pubmed: 29374059
J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 27;277(52):50597-606
pubmed: 12372823
Biophys J. 1997 Aug;73(2):1073-80
pubmed: 9251823
ACS Nano. 2018 Feb 27;12(2):1508-1518
pubmed: 29350911
Elife. 2016 Apr 08;5:
pubmed: 27058170
Cell. 2018 Jun 28;174(1):202-217.e9
pubmed: 29958108
J Phys Chem B. 2020 Jun 11;124(23):4673-4685
pubmed: 32379446
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 31;12(1):2010
pubmed: 33790297
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 19;9(1):4348
pubmed: 30341303
Biophys J. 2019 Sep 3;117(5):892-902
pubmed: 31400918
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Oct;58:43-52
pubmed: 31226513
Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1023-7
pubmed: 19098896
Biophys J. 2004 Nov;87(5):3518-24
pubmed: 15339818
Biophys J. 2014 Sep 16;107(6):1393-402
pubmed: 25229147
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 19;108(16):6438-43
pubmed: 21464280
Biophys J. 2018 Feb 6;114(3):534-538
pubmed: 29395045
J Chem Phys. 2015 Aug 28;143(8):085101
pubmed: 26328871